Age Deficits in Associative Memory are not Alleviated by Multisensory Paradigms

Stephen P Badham, Christopher Atkin, Jemaine E Stacey, Helen Henshaw, Harriet A Allen, Katherine L Roberts
{"title":"Age Deficits in Associative Memory are not Alleviated by Multisensory Paradigms","authors":"Stephen P Badham, Christopher Atkin, Jemaine E Stacey, Helen Henshaw, Harriet A Allen, Katherine L Roberts","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Age deficits in memory are widespread, this impacts individuals at a personal level, and investigating memory has been a key focus in cognitive ageing research. Age deficits occur in memory for an episode, where information from the environment is integrated through the senses into an episodic event via associative memory. Associating items in memory has been shown to be particularly difficult for older adults but can often be alleviated by providing support from the external environment. The current investigation explored the potential for increased sensory input (multimodal stimuli) to alleviate age deficits in associative memory. Here, we present compelling evidence, supported by Bayesian analysis, for a null age-by-modality interaction. Methods Across three pre-registered studies, young and older adults (n = 860) completed associative memory tasks either in single modalities or in multimodal formats. Study 1 used either visual text (unimodal) or video introductions (multimodal) to test memory for name-face associations. Studies 2 and 3 tested memory for paired associates. Study 2 used unimodal visual presentation or cross modal visual-auditory word pairs in a cued recall paradigm. Study 3 presented word pairs as visual only, auditory only or audiovisual and tested memory separately for items (individual words) or associations (word pairings). Results Typical age deficits in associative memory emerged, but these were not alleviated by multimodal presentation. Discussion The lack of multimodal support for associative memory indicates that perceptual manipulations are less effective than other forms of environmental support at alleviating age deficits in associative memory.","PeriodicalId":501650,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Age deficits in memory are widespread, this impacts individuals at a personal level, and investigating memory has been a key focus in cognitive ageing research. Age deficits occur in memory for an episode, where information from the environment is integrated through the senses into an episodic event via associative memory. Associating items in memory has been shown to be particularly difficult for older adults but can often be alleviated by providing support from the external environment. The current investigation explored the potential for increased sensory input (multimodal stimuli) to alleviate age deficits in associative memory. Here, we present compelling evidence, supported by Bayesian analysis, for a null age-by-modality interaction. Methods Across three pre-registered studies, young and older adults (n = 860) completed associative memory tasks either in single modalities or in multimodal formats. Study 1 used either visual text (unimodal) or video introductions (multimodal) to test memory for name-face associations. Studies 2 and 3 tested memory for paired associates. Study 2 used unimodal visual presentation or cross modal visual-auditory word pairs in a cued recall paradigm. Study 3 presented word pairs as visual only, auditory only or audiovisual and tested memory separately for items (individual words) or associations (word pairings). Results Typical age deficits in associative memory emerged, but these were not alleviated by multimodal presentation. Discussion The lack of multimodal support for associative memory indicates that perceptual manipulations are less effective than other forms of environmental support at alleviating age deficits in associative memory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多感官范式无法缓解联想记忆中的年龄缺陷
目标 记忆力普遍存在年龄缺陷,这对个人的影响很大,而调查记忆力一直是认知老龄化研究的一个重点。年龄缺陷发生在对事件的记忆上,即通过联想记忆将来自环境的信息通过感官整合到事件中。对老年人来说,联想记忆中的项目尤其困难,但通过外部环境的支持往往可以缓解这一问题。目前的研究探索了增加感官输入(多模态刺激)以缓解联想记忆中的年龄缺陷的可能性。在此,我们提出了令人信服的证据,并通过贝叶斯分析证明了年龄与多模态的负交互作用。方法 在三项预先登记的研究中,年轻人和老年人(n = 860)完成了单一模式或多模式联想记忆任务。研究 1 使用视觉文本(单模态)或视频介绍(多模态)来测试姓名-面孔联想记忆。研究 2 和研究 3 测试了配对联想记忆。研究 2 采用单模态视觉呈现或跨模态视觉-听觉单词配对的提示回忆范式。研究 3 采用仅视觉、仅听觉或视听模式呈现词对,并分别测试项目(单个单词)或联想(词对)记忆。结果 在联想记忆方面出现了典型的年龄缺陷,但多模态呈现并没有减轻这些缺陷。讨论 联想记忆缺乏多模态支持表明,在缓解联想记忆的年龄缺陷方面,感知操作不如其他形式的环境支持有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporary Setback or Lasting Challenge? The Impact of Transient and Persistent Functional disability on later life well-being Context Matters: Internet Usage and Loneliness Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic Worrying Across the Generations: The Impact of Adult Grandchildren’s Problems on Grandparents’ Well-Being The Relationship Between 10-Year Changes in Cognitive Control Beliefs and Cognitive Performance in Middle and Later Adulthood Improving Memory through Better Sleep in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Tai Chi Intervention Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1