Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the patient on hemodialysis resilience scale

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1111/1744-9987.14138
Çiğdem Özdemir Eler, Sultan Kav
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the patient on hemodialysis resilience scale","authors":"Çiğdem Özdemir Eler, Sultan Kav","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the hemodialysis resilience scale (PHRS) in the Turkish population.MethodsA cross‐sectional methodologic study involved 136 hemodialysis patients at two dialysis centers affiliated with a foundation university in Turkey. The updated guidelines for the Intercultural Scale Adaptation Stages, Language, and Culture Adaptation were followed.ResultsCronbach's α of the PHRS‐Tr was 0.94. A three‐factor structure was extracted, namely “the pursuit of positive meaning in the present,” “building the will to live through close human relationships,” and “acceptance of hemodialysis as a part of daily life” explaining 66.82% of the total variance. Test–retest reliability was conducted with 50 patients within the sample 2 weeks after the first application. The correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability was <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.680.ConclusionThe study results indicate that the PHRS‐Tr is a valid and reliable tool for assessing resilience status in Turkish hemodialysis patients.","PeriodicalId":23021,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the hemodialysis resilience scale (PHRS) in the Turkish population.MethodsA cross‐sectional methodologic study involved 136 hemodialysis patients at two dialysis centers affiliated with a foundation university in Turkey. The updated guidelines for the Intercultural Scale Adaptation Stages, Language, and Culture Adaptation were followed.ResultsCronbach's α of the PHRS‐Tr was 0.94. A three‐factor structure was extracted, namely “the pursuit of positive meaning in the present,” “building the will to live through close human relationships,” and “acceptance of hemodialysis as a part of daily life” explaining 66.82% of the total variance. Test–retest reliability was conducted with 50 patients within the sample 2 weeks after the first application. The correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability was r = 0.680.ConclusionThe study results indicate that the PHRS‐Tr is a valid and reliable tool for assessing resilience status in Turkish hemodialysis patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其版血液透析患者复原力量表的有效性和可靠性
导言:本研究旨在评估血液透析适应性量表(PHRS)在土耳其人群中的有效性和可靠性。方法:本研究采用横断面方法,涉及土耳其一所基础大学下属两个透析中心的 136 名血液透析患者。结果PHRS-Tr的克朗巴赫α为0.94。提取出了一个三因素结构,即 "追求当下的积极意义"、"通过亲密的人际关系建立生存意志 "和 "接受血液透析作为日常生活的一部分",解释了总方差的 66.82%。在首次应用 2 周后,对样本中的 50 名患者进行了重测可靠性测试。研究结果表明,PHRS-Tr 是评估土耳其血液透析患者复原力状况的有效而可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis is the official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. The Journal publishes original articles, editorial comments, review articles, case reports, meeting abstracts and Communications information on apheresis and dialysis technologies and treatments.
期刊最新文献
Fear of falling and associated influencing factors in patients on maintenance hemodialysis Enhancing hepatitis C management in ESRD: Evaluating efficacy and safety of alternative antiviral regimens Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis Forthcoming Events October 2024 Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis Forthcoming Events August 2024 Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the patient on hemodialysis resilience scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1