Impact of Patient Body Posture on RF-Induced Energy Absorption by Orthopedic Plates

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1155/2024/7418643
Xiaolin Yang, Jianfeng Zheng, Wolfgang Kainz, Xuemin Chen, Ji Chen
{"title":"Impact of Patient Body Posture on RF-Induced Energy Absorption by Orthopedic Plates","authors":"Xiaolin Yang,&nbsp;Jianfeng Zheng,&nbsp;Wolfgang Kainz,&nbsp;Xuemin Chen,&nbsp;Ji Chen","doi":"10.1155/2024/7418643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates variations in radiofrequency- (RF-) induced energy absorption by orthopedic plates within the human body during 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, considering diverse postures. Using the poseable Duke model, we developed typical postures (O-posture, X-posture, Y-posture, and Z-posture) and placed anatomically correct representations of various orthopedic plates within these postures. Numerical simulations were conducted to evaluate electromagnetic fields and RF-induced energy absorption in these postures near orthopedic plates during MRI scans. Comparing RF-induced energy absorption (peak spatial averaged SAR over 1 g, pSAR<sub>1g</sub>) in postured models to the original posture reveals substantial variations. The pSAR<sub>1g</sub> differences for X-posture, Y-posture, and Z-posture reach 48%, 134%, and 32% at 1.5T, and 36%, 83%, and 101% at 3T, respectively. Changing posture can lead to higher or lower pSAR<sub>1g</sub>. These findings underscore the impact of patient posture on RF-induced energy absorption in orthopedic plates on the ulna bone. The study recommends considering representative body postures in future evaluations for MR conditional labeling of passive implants. Until then, maintaining a neutral posture during MR scans is advised to mitigate unforeseen RF-induced heating risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50623,"journal":{"name":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/7418643","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7418643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates variations in radiofrequency- (RF-) induced energy absorption by orthopedic plates within the human body during 1.5T and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, considering diverse postures. Using the poseable Duke model, we developed typical postures (O-posture, X-posture, Y-posture, and Z-posture) and placed anatomically correct representations of various orthopedic plates within these postures. Numerical simulations were conducted to evaluate electromagnetic fields and RF-induced energy absorption in these postures near orthopedic plates during MRI scans. Comparing RF-induced energy absorption (peak spatial averaged SAR over 1 g, pSAR1g) in postured models to the original posture reveals substantial variations. The pSAR1g differences for X-posture, Y-posture, and Z-posture reach 48%, 134%, and 32% at 1.5T, and 36%, 83%, and 101% at 3T, respectively. Changing posture can lead to higher or lower pSAR1g. These findings underscore the impact of patient posture on RF-induced energy absorption in orthopedic plates on the ulna bone. The study recommends considering representative body postures in future evaluations for MR conditional labeling of passive implants. Until then, maintaining a neutral posture during MR scans is advised to mitigate unforeseen RF-induced heating risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者身体姿势对骨科钢板射频能量吸收的影响
本研究调查了在 1.5T 和 3T 磁共振成像(MRI)扫描过程中,考虑到各种姿势,人体内矫形板的射频(RF)诱导能量吸收的变化。我们使用可摆姿势杜克模型开发了典型姿势(O-姿势、X-姿势、Y-姿势和 Z-姿势),并在这些姿势中放置了解剖学上正确的各种矫形板。我们进行了数值模拟,以评估磁共振成像扫描时这些姿势中矫形板附近的电磁场和射频诱导的能量吸收。比较姿势模型与原始姿势的射频诱导能量吸收(1 g 的峰值空间平均 SAR,pSAR1g),发现两者之间存在很大差异。在 1.5T 下,X-姿势、Y-姿势和 Z-姿势的 pSAR1g 分别达到 48%、134% 和 32%,在 3T 下分别达到 36%、83% 和 101%。改变姿势会导致 pSAR1g 值升高或降低。这些发现强调了患者姿势对尺骨矫形板射频诱导能量吸收的影响。研究建议,在未来对被动植入物进行磁共振条件标记评估时,应考虑具有代表性的身体姿势。在此之前,建议在磁共振扫描过程中保持中立姿势,以降低不可预见的射频诱导加热风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B brings together engineers and physicists involved in the design and development of hardware and software employed in magnetic resonance techniques. The journal welcomes contributions predominantly from the fields of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), but also encourages submissions relating to less common magnetic resonance imaging and analytical methods. Contributors come from both academia and industry, to report the latest advancements in the development of instrumentation and computer programming to underpin medical, non-medical, and analytical magnetic resonance techniques.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Patient Body Posture on RF-Induced Energy Absorption by Orthopedic Plates Odd-Leg Birdcages for Geometric Decoupling in Multinuclear Imaging and Spectroscopy A General Framework for Automated Accurate Calculation of b-Matrix (Auto-b) in Diffusion MRI Pulse Sequences Development of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Magnet System for In Vivo Tooth Dosimetry Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease with Extreme Learning Machine on Whole-Brain Functional Connectivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1