Estimating the number of sequencing errors in microbial diversity studies

Abstract

Species diversity analysis of microbial communities is an important tool for assessing an ecosystem health. The advent of high-throughput genome sequencing techniques has made it possible to process an unprecedented number of RNA sequences. However, many studies report the presence of a significant number of fictitious rare species in datasets generated using these techniques. These species are the product of errors that can occur at any step of the sequence analysis pipeline. The overcount of rare species (especially singletons) affects the estimation of the total number of species, and of the diversity of the community as measured by Shannon’s index. To avoid overestimating these quantities, it is crucial to model the source of error. In this work, we present a new model that treats spurious singletons as false-negative record linkage errors, and compare it with another approach where spurious singletons are considered for deletion. We discuss the two inferential approaches both with an application to real data and on theoretical grounds. We demonstrate that, while Shannon’s index can differ significantly under the two models, the estimate of the total number of species is equivalent.