Changes in Global Nutrition Practices in Critically Ill Children and the Influence of Emerging Evidence: A Secondary Analysis of the Pediatric International Nutrition Studies, 2009-2018.
Alireza Akhondi-Asl, Katelyn Ariagno, Larissa Fluckiger, Corinne Jotterand Chaparro, Enid E Martinez, Yara M F Moreno, Chengsi Ong, Heather E Skillman, Lyvonne Tume, Nilesh M Mehta, Lori J Bechard
{"title":"Changes in Global Nutrition Practices in Critically Ill Children and the Influence of Emerging Evidence: A Secondary Analysis of the Pediatric International Nutrition Studies, 2009-2018.","authors":"Alireza Akhondi-Asl, Katelyn Ariagno, Larissa Fluckiger, Corinne Jotterand Chaparro, Enid E Martinez, Yara M F Moreno, Chengsi Ong, Heather E Skillman, Lyvonne Tume, Nilesh M Mehta, Lori J Bechard","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2024.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timeline of the 3 Pediatric International Nutrition Studies (PINS) coincided with the publication of 2 major guidelines for the timing of parenteral nutrition (PN) and recommended energy and protein delivery dose.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study's main objective was to describe changes in the nutrition delivery practice recorded in PINS1 and PINS2 (PINS1-2) (conducted in 2009 and 2011, preexposure epoch) vs PINS3 (conducted in 2018, postexposure epoch), in relation to the published practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a secondary analysis of data from a multicenter prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants/setting: </strong>Data from 3650 participants, aged 1 month to 18 years, admitted to 100 unique hospitals that participated in 3 PINS was used for this study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The time in days from pediatric intensive care unit admission to the initiation of PN and enteral nutrition delivery were the primary outcomes. Prescribed energy and protein goals were the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses performed: </strong>A frailty model with a random intercept per hospital with stratified baseline hazard function by region for the primary outcomes and a mixed-effects negative binomial regression with random intercept per hospital for the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of patients receiving enteral nutrition (88.3% vs 80.6%; P < .001) was higher, and those receiving PN (20.6% vs 28.8%; P < .001) was lower in the PINS3 cohort compared with PINS1-2. In the PINS3 cohort, the odds of initiating PN during the first 10 days of pediatric intensive care unit admission were lower, compared with the PINS1-2 cohort (hazard ratio 0.8, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.95; P = .013); and prescribed energy goal was lower compared with the PINS1-2 cohort (incident rate ratio 0.918, 95% CI 0.874 to 0.965; P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The likelihood of initiation of PN delivery significantly decreased during the first 10 days after admission in the PINS3 cohort compared with PINS1-2. Energy goal prescription in children receiving mechanical ventilation significantly decreased in the postguidelines epoch compared with the preguidelines epoch.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"1657-1667.e5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.04.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The timeline of the 3 Pediatric International Nutrition Studies (PINS) coincided with the publication of 2 major guidelines for the timing of parenteral nutrition (PN) and recommended energy and protein delivery dose.
Objective: The study's main objective was to describe changes in the nutrition delivery practice recorded in PINS1 and PINS2 (PINS1-2) (conducted in 2009 and 2011, preexposure epoch) vs PINS3 (conducted in 2018, postexposure epoch), in relation to the published practice guidelines.
Design: This study is a secondary analysis of data from a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Participants/setting: Data from 3650 participants, aged 1 month to 18 years, admitted to 100 unique hospitals that participated in 3 PINS was used for this study.
Main outcome measures: The time in days from pediatric intensive care unit admission to the initiation of PN and enteral nutrition delivery were the primary outcomes. Prescribed energy and protein goals were the secondary outcomes.
Statistical analyses performed: A frailty model with a random intercept per hospital with stratified baseline hazard function by region for the primary outcomes and a mixed-effects negative binomial regression with random intercept per hospital for the secondary outcomes.
Results: The proportion of patients receiving enteral nutrition (88.3% vs 80.6%; P < .001) was higher, and those receiving PN (20.6% vs 28.8%; P < .001) was lower in the PINS3 cohort compared with PINS1-2. In the PINS3 cohort, the odds of initiating PN during the first 10 days of pediatric intensive care unit admission were lower, compared with the PINS1-2 cohort (hazard ratio 0.8, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.95; P = .013); and prescribed energy goal was lower compared with the PINS1-2 cohort (incident rate ratio 0.918, 95% CI 0.874 to 0.965; P = .001).
Conclusions: The likelihood of initiation of PN delivery significantly decreased during the first 10 days after admission in the PINS3 cohort compared with PINS1-2. Energy goal prescription in children receiving mechanical ventilation significantly decreased in the postguidelines epoch compared with the preguidelines epoch.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
