Frequency of misdiagnosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae031
Søren K Nielsen, Torsten B Rasmussen, Thomas M Hey, Tomas Zaremba, Jens F Lassen, Jens Mogensen
{"title":"Frequency of misdiagnosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Søren K Nielsen, Torsten B Rasmussen, Thomas M Hey, Tomas Zaremba, Jens F Lassen, Jens Mogensen","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) ≥15 mm. The condition is often hereditary, and family screening is recommended to reduce the risk of adverse disease complications and premature death among relatives. Correct diagnosis of index patients is important to ensure that only relatives at risk of disease development are invited for family screening. To investigate whether patients with International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for HCM (DI421) or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) (DI422) fulfilled recognized diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with ICD-10 codes for HCM or HOCM at a Department of Cardiology were identified and had their diagnosis validated by a cardiac investigation or a review of their medical records and previous investigations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 patients had ICD-10 codes for HCM/HOCM, of whom 202 (84%, 202/240) underwent re-examination, while 38 (16%, 38/240) had their hospital notes reviewed. A total of 76 patients (32%, n = 76/240) did not fulfil diagnostic criteria, of whom 39 (51%, n = 39/76) had normal (10 mm) or modest LV wall thickness (11-14 mm). The remaining 37 patients (49%, n = 37/76) had LVH ≥15 mm, which was well explained by uncontrolled hypertension (32%, n = 24/76), aortic valve stenosis (19%, n = 7/76), or wild-type amyloidosis (16%, n = 6/76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-third of patients with ICD-10 codes for HCM or HOCM did not fulfil recognized diagnostic criteria. Incorrect diagnosis of HCM may cause unnecessary family investigations, which may be associated with anxiety, and a waste of healthcare resources. This highlights the need for specialized cardiomyopathy services to ensure correct diagnosis and management of HCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"105-112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) ≥15 mm. The condition is often hereditary, and family screening is recommended to reduce the risk of adverse disease complications and premature death among relatives. Correct diagnosis of index patients is important to ensure that only relatives at risk of disease development are invited for family screening. To investigate whether patients with International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for HCM (DI421) or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) (DI422) fulfilled recognized diagnostic criteria.

Methods: All patients with ICD-10 codes for HCM or HOCM at a Department of Cardiology were identified and had their diagnosis validated by a cardiac investigation or a review of their medical records and previous investigations.

Results: A total of 240 patients had ICD-10 codes for HCM/HOCM, of whom 202 (84%, 202/240) underwent re-examination, while 38 (16%, 38/240) had their hospital notes reviewed. A total of 76 patients (32%, n = 76/240) did not fulfil diagnostic criteria, of whom 39 (51%, n = 39/76) had normal (10 mm) or modest LV wall thickness (11-14 mm). The remaining 37 patients (49%, n = 37/76) had LVH ≥15 mm, which was well explained by uncontrolled hypertension (32%, n = 24/76), aortic valve stenosis (19%, n = 7/76), or wild-type amyloidosis (16%, n = 6/76).

Conclusion: One-third of patients with ICD-10 codes for HCM or HOCM did not fulfil recognized diagnostic criteria. Incorrect diagnosis of HCM may cause unnecessary family investigations, which may be associated with anxiety, and a waste of healthcare resources. This highlights the need for specialized cardiomyopathy services to ensure correct diagnosis and management of HCM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥厚型心肌病的误诊率。
背景:肥厚型心肌病(HCM)的特征是不明原因的左心室肥厚(LVH)≥15 毫米。该病通常具有遗传性,建议进行家族筛查,以降低亲属间发生不良疾病并发症和过早死亡的风险。目的:调查 ICD-10 编码为 HCM(DI421)或肥厚型梗阻性心肌病(DI422)的患者是否符合公认的诊断标准:方法: 识别心脏科所有 ICD-10 编码为 HCM 或 HOCM 的患者,并通过心脏检查或回顾其病历和既往检查验证其诊断:240 名患者的 ICD-10 编码为 HCM/HOCM,其中 202 人(84%,202/240)接受了复查,38 人(16%,38/240)的住院病历进行了复查。76名患者(32%,n = 76/240)不符合诊断标准,其中39名患者(51%,n = 39/76)左心室壁厚度正常(10毫米)或适中(11-14毫米)。其余37名患者(49%,n = 37/76)的左心室壁厚度≥15毫米,未控制的高血压(32%,n = 24/76)、主动脉瓣狭窄(19%,n = 7/76)或野生型淀粉样变性(16%,6/76)能很好地解释这些情况:结论:在 ICD-10 编码为 HCM 或 HOCM 的患者中,有三分之一不符合公认的诊断标准。对 HCM 的错误诊断可能导致不必要的家庭调查,这可能与焦虑和医疗资源的浪费有关。这突出表明,有必要提供专门的心肌病服务,以确保对 HCM 进行正确诊断和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Inclusion and reporting by age, sex, and ethnicity in clinical studies of high-risk medical devices approved in the European Union. Frequency of misdiagnosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. An early accumulation of serum uric acid confers more risk of heart failure: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Prognostic value of weight loss in hospitalized patients with heart failure. Temporal trends in mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke in heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation: a nationwide study from 1997 to 2018 on 152 059 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1