Breaking down barriers and building up facilitators of lecture free curriculum in medical education: An interpretive structural modeling.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2343025
Sahar Karami, Mohammad Shariati, Dean Parmelee, Hooman Shahsavari, Akram Sadeghian, Roberto Baelo Alvarez, Abir Zitouni, Maryam Alizadeh
{"title":"Breaking down barriers and building up facilitators of lecture free curriculum in medical education: An interpretive structural modeling.","authors":"Sahar Karami, Mohammad Shariati, Dean Parmelee, Hooman Shahsavari, Akram Sadeghian, Roberto Baelo Alvarez, Abir Zitouni, Maryam Alizadeh","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2343025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The field of medical education has seen a growing interest in lecture free curriculum. However, it comes with its own set of challenges and obstacles. In this article, we aim to identify the prerequisites, facilitators, challenges, and barriers of lecture-free curriculum in medical education and examine their interrelationships using interpretive structural modeling (ISM) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this mixed-method study initially, we performed a scoping review and semi-structured interviews and determined the main prerequisites, facilitators, challenges, and barriers of lecture-free curriculum in medical education using qualitative content analysis approach. The interrelationships among these components were investigated using ISM. Therefore, self-interactive structural matrices were formed, initial and final reachability matrices were achieved, and MICMAC analysis was conducted to classify the factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, two ISM models of prerequisites and facilitators with 27 factors in 10 levels and challenges and obstacles with 25 factors in eight levels were developed. Each of the models was divided into three parts: key, strategic, and dependent factors. 'Providing relevant evidence regarding lecture free curriculum' emerged as the most important prerequisite and facilitator, and 'insufficient support from the university' was identified as the most critical barrier and challenge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights the significant importance of lecture-free curriculum in medical education and provides insights into its prerequisites, facilitators, challenges, and barriers. The findings can be utilized by educational managers and decision-makers to implement necessary changes in the design and implementation of lecture-free in medical education, leading to more effective improvements in the quality and success of education.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2343025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The field of medical education has seen a growing interest in lecture free curriculum. However, it comes with its own set of challenges and obstacles. In this article, we aim to identify the prerequisites, facilitators, challenges, and barriers of lecture-free curriculum in medical education and examine their interrelationships using interpretive structural modeling (ISM) technique.

Methods: In this mixed-method study initially, we performed a scoping review and semi-structured interviews and determined the main prerequisites, facilitators, challenges, and barriers of lecture-free curriculum in medical education using qualitative content analysis approach. The interrelationships among these components were investigated using ISM. Therefore, self-interactive structural matrices were formed, initial and final reachability matrices were achieved, and MICMAC analysis was conducted to classify the factors.

Results: Finally, two ISM models of prerequisites and facilitators with 27 factors in 10 levels and challenges and obstacles with 25 factors in eight levels were developed. Each of the models was divided into three parts: key, strategic, and dependent factors. 'Providing relevant evidence regarding lecture free curriculum' emerged as the most important prerequisite and facilitator, and 'insufficient support from the university' was identified as the most critical barrier and challenge.

Conclusions: The study highlights the significant importance of lecture-free curriculum in medical education and provides insights into its prerequisites, facilitators, challenges, and barriers. The findings can be utilized by educational managers and decision-makers to implement necessary changes in the design and implementation of lecture-free in medical education, leading to more effective improvements in the quality and success of education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打破医学教育中无讲授课程的障碍并建立促进因素:解释性结构模型。
简介医学教育领域对无讲授课程的兴趣与日俱增。然而,无讲授课程也面临着一系列挑战和障碍。本文旨在确定医学教育中无讲授课程的先决条件、促进因素、挑战和障碍,并使用解释性结构建模(ISM)技术研究它们之间的相互关系:在这项混合方法研究中,我们首先进行了范围综述和半结构式访谈,并采用定性内容分析法确定了医学教育中无讲授课程的主要先决条件、促进因素、挑战和障碍。使用 ISM 调查了这些组成部分之间的相互关系。因此,形成了自交互结构矩阵,实现了初始和最终可达性矩阵,并进行了 MICMAC 分析以对因素进行分类:结果:最后,建立了两个 ISM 模型,一个是先决条件和促进因素模型,包含 10 个层次的 27 个因素;另一个是挑战和障碍模型,包含 8 个层次的 25 个因素。每个模型都分为三个部分:关键因素、战略因素和从属因素。提供有关免费讲座课程的相关证据 "被认为是最重要的先决条件和促进因素,而 "大学的支持不足 "被认为是最关键的障碍和挑战:本研究强调了无讲授课程在医学教育中的重要性,并对其前提条件、促进因素、挑战和障碍进行了深入分析。教育管理者和决策者可以利用这些研究结果,对医学教育中的无讲授课程的设计和实施进行必要的改革,从而更有效地提高教育质量和成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Integration of behavioral, social, and humanities sciences into healthcare and education and their alignment with medical education programs. Submitting artificial intelligence in health professions education papers to medical teacher. Transformative power of an early ICU internship: A reflection from our undergraduate medical students. Medical education challenges in Mainland China: An analysis of the application of problem-based learning. Transforming remediation for competency-based medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1