A systematic literature review of ride-sharing platforms, user factors and barriers.

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 European Transport Research Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-07 DOI:10.1186/s12544-021-00522-1
Lambros Mitropoulos, Annie Kortsari, Georgia Ayfantopoulou
{"title":"A systematic literature review of ride-sharing platforms, user factors and barriers.","authors":"Lambros Mitropoulos, Annie Kortsari, Georgia Ayfantopoulou","doi":"10.1186/s12544-021-00522-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Ride-sharing is an innovative on-demand transport service that aims to promote sustainable transport, reduce car utilization, increase vehicle occupancy and public transport ridership. By reviewing ride-sharing studies around the world, this paper aims to map major aspects of ride-sharing, including online platforms, user factors and barriers that affect ride-sharing services, and extract useful insights regarding their successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic literature review is conducted on scientific publications in English language. Articles are eligible if they report a study on user factors affecting ride-sharing use and/or barriers preventing ride-sharing implementation; ride-sharing online platforms in these articles are also recorded and are further explored through their official websites. A database is built that organizes articles per author, year and location, summarizes online platform attributes, and groups user factors associated with the likelihood to ride-share.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The review shows that the term \"ride-sharing\" is used in the literature for both profit and non-profit ride-sharing services. In total, twenty-nine ride-sharing online platforms are recorded and analyzed according to specific characteristics. Sixteen user factors related to the likelihood to ride-share are recorded and grouped into sociodemographic, location and system factors. While location and system factors are found to follow a pattern among studies, mixed findings are recorded on the relationship between sociodemographic factors and ride-sharing. Factors that may hinder the development of ride-sharing systems are grouped into economic, technological, business, behavioral and regulatory barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opportunities exist to improve the quality of existing ride-sharing services and plan successful new ones. Future research efforts should focus towards studying ride-sharing users' trip purpose (i.e., work, university, shopping, etc.), investigating factors associated to ride-sharing before and after implementation of the service, and perform cross-case studies between cities and countries of the same continent to compare findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48671,"journal":{"name":"European Transport Research Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Transport Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00522-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Ride-sharing is an innovative on-demand transport service that aims to promote sustainable transport, reduce car utilization, increase vehicle occupancy and public transport ridership. By reviewing ride-sharing studies around the world, this paper aims to map major aspects of ride-sharing, including online platforms, user factors and barriers that affect ride-sharing services, and extract useful insights regarding their successful implementation.

Method: A systematic literature review is conducted on scientific publications in English language. Articles are eligible if they report a study on user factors affecting ride-sharing use and/or barriers preventing ride-sharing implementation; ride-sharing online platforms in these articles are also recorded and are further explored through their official websites. A database is built that organizes articles per author, year and location, summarizes online platform attributes, and groups user factors associated with the likelihood to ride-share.

Findings: The review shows that the term "ride-sharing" is used in the literature for both profit and non-profit ride-sharing services. In total, twenty-nine ride-sharing online platforms are recorded and analyzed according to specific characteristics. Sixteen user factors related to the likelihood to ride-share are recorded and grouped into sociodemographic, location and system factors. While location and system factors are found to follow a pattern among studies, mixed findings are recorded on the relationship between sociodemographic factors and ride-sharing. Factors that may hinder the development of ride-sharing systems are grouped into economic, technological, business, behavioral and regulatory barriers.

Conclusion: Opportunities exist to improve the quality of existing ride-sharing services and plan successful new ones. Future research efforts should focus towards studying ride-sharing users' trip purpose (i.e., work, university, shopping, etc.), investigating factors associated to ride-sharing before and after implementation of the service, and perform cross-case studies between cities and countries of the same continent to compare findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于共享出行平台、用户因素和障碍的系统性文献综述。
目的:共享乘车是一种创新的按需交通服务,旨在促进可持续交通、减少汽车使用、提高车辆利用率和公共交通乘客数量。通过回顾世界各地的共享乘车研究,本文旨在描绘共享乘车的主要方面,包括在线平台、用户因素和影响共享乘车服务的障碍,并就其成功实施提取有用的见解:方法:对英文科学出版物进行系统的文献综述。只要是对影响共乘服务使用的用户因素和/或阻碍共乘服务实施的障碍进行研究的文章都符合条件;这些文章中的共乘服务在线平台也被记录在案,并通过其官方网站进行进一步探究。我们建立了一个数据库,按作者、年份和地点对文章进行整理,总结在线平台的属性,并对与共享出行可能性相关的用户因素进行分组:综述显示,"共享出行 "一词在文献中被用于营利性和非营利性共享出行服务。共记录了 29 个共享乘车网络平台,并根据具体特征进行了分析。记录了与共享出行可能性相关的 16 个用户因素,并将其分为社会人口因素、地点因素和系统因素。研究发现,地点和系统因素在不同研究中具有相同的模式,而社会人口因素与合乘之间的关系则有不同的研究结果。可能阻碍共乘系统发展的因素分为经济、技术、商业、行为和监管障碍:提高现有共享乘车服务的质量和成功规划新的共享乘车服务的机会是存在的。未来的研究工作应侧重于研究共享乘车用户的出行目的(如工作、上大学、购物等),调查共享乘车服务实施前后的相关因素,并在同一大洲的不同城市和国家之间开展交叉研究,以比较研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Transport Research Review
European Transport Research Review Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: European Transport Research Review (ETRR) is a peer-reviewed open access journal publishing original high-quality scholarly research and developments in areas related to transportation science, technologies, policy and practice. Established in 2008 by the European Conference of Transport Research Institutes (ECTRI), the Journal provides researchers and practitioners around the world with an authoritative forum for the dissemination and critical discussion of new ideas and methodologies that originate in, or are of special interest to, the European transport research community. The journal is unique in its field, as it covers all modes of transport and addresses both the engineering and the social science perspective, offering a truly multidisciplinary platform for researchers, practitioners, engineers and policymakers. ETRR is aimed at a readership including researchers, practitioners in the design and operation of transportation systems, and policymakers at the international, national, regional and local levels.
期刊最新文献
Exploring hybrid models for identifying locations for active mobility pathways using real-time spatial Delphi and GANs. How accessibility to schools is not (just) a transport problem: the case of public school choice in the city of Malmö, Sweden Mobility-as-a-Service users: insights from a trial in Sydney Evaluating the impacts of the demerit points system on traffic law violations and driver involvement in road accidents in Israel Modelling public attitude towards drone delivery in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1