Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II A/B Seminomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Braz J Urol Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0134
Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar Melão, Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz de Amorim, Murilo Ribeiro Sanches, Giovanna Veiga Gomes, Douglas Mesadri Gewehr, Luis Henrique de Oliveira Moreira, Thaise Pedreira da Silva, Matheus de Melo Lobo, Gustavo Ruschi Bechara
{"title":"Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II A/B Seminomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar Melão, Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz de Amorim, Murilo Ribeiro Sanches, Giovanna Veiga Gomes, Douglas Mesadri Gewehr, Luis Henrique de Oliveira Moreira, Thaise Pedreira da Silva, Matheus de Melo Lobo, Gustavo Ruschi Bechara","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are considered standard treatments for stage II seminoma patients; however, these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Recently, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has emerged as an alternative strategy, and the first three phase II trials were published in 2023 with promising results. The present study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate this surgery as an alternative treatment for stage IIA/B seminoma patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Seminomas are the most common testicular tumors, often affecting young adult males. Standard treatments for stage II seminomas include chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Thus, identifying alternative strategies is paramount. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for treating this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating RPLND as a primary treatment for stage II A/B seminomas. Using a random-effects model, single proportion and means and pooled 2-year recurrence-free survival rates with hazard rates and 95% CI were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included, comprising 331 males with stage II seminomas. In the pooled analysis, the recurrence rate was 17.69% (95% CI 12.31-24.75), and the 2-year RFS rate was 81% (95% CI 0.77-0.86). The complication rate was 9.16% (95% CI 6.16-13.42), the Clavien-Dindo > 2 complication rate was 8.83% (95% CI 5.76-13.31), and the retrograde ejaculation rate was 7.01% (95% CI 3.54-13.40). The median operative time was 174.68 min (95% CI 122.17-249.76 min), median blood loss was 105.91 mL (95% CI 46.89-239.22 mL), and patients with no evidence of lymph node involvement ranged from 0-16%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary RPLNDs for treating stage IIA/B seminomas have favorable RFS rates, with low complication and recurrence rates. These findings provide evidence that this surgery is a viable alternative therapy for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"50 ","pages":"415-432"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Braz J Urol","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are considered standard treatments for stage II seminoma patients; however, these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Recently, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has emerged as an alternative strategy, and the first three phase II trials were published in 2023 with promising results. The present study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate this surgery as an alternative treatment for stage IIA/B seminoma patients.

Purpose: Seminomas are the most common testicular tumors, often affecting young adult males. Standard treatments for stage II seminomas include chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Thus, identifying alternative strategies is paramount. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for treating this condition.

Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating RPLND as a primary treatment for stage II A/B seminomas. Using a random-effects model, single proportion and means and pooled 2-year recurrence-free survival rates with hazard rates and 95% CI were calculated.

Results: Seven studies were included, comprising 331 males with stage II seminomas. In the pooled analysis, the recurrence rate was 17.69% (95% CI 12.31-24.75), and the 2-year RFS rate was 81% (95% CI 0.77-0.86). The complication rate was 9.16% (95% CI 6.16-13.42), the Clavien-Dindo > 2 complication rate was 8.83% (95% CI 5.76-13.31), and the retrograde ejaculation rate was 7.01% (95% CI 3.54-13.40). The median operative time was 174.68 min (95% CI 122.17-249.76 min), median blood loss was 105.91 mL (95% CI 46.89-239.22 mL), and patients with no evidence of lymph node involvement ranged from 0-16%.

Conclusions: Primary RPLNDs for treating stage IIA/B seminomas have favorable RFS rates, with low complication and recurrence rates. These findings provide evidence that this surgery is a viable alternative therapy for these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床 II 期 A/B 半实体瘤的原发性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术:系统综述与元分析》。
简介:化疗和放疗被认为是 II 期精原细胞瘤患者的标准治疗方法:化疗和放疗被认为是精原细胞瘤II期患者的标准治疗方法;然而,这些疗法与长期毒性相关。最近,腹膜后淋巴结清扫术作为一种替代策略出现,2023年首次公布了三项II期试验,结果令人鼓舞。本研究进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估该手术作为IIA/B期精原细胞瘤患者的替代治疗方法。目的:精原细胞瘤是最常见的睾丸肿瘤,通常影响青壮年男性。II期精原细胞瘤的标准治疗方法包括化疗和放疗,但这些疗法都有长期毒性。因此,确定替代策略至关重要。在此,我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(RPLND)治疗这种疾病的有效性和安全性:我们在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中系统检索了评估RPLND作为II期A/B精原细胞瘤主要治疗方法的研究。采用随机效应模型,计算了单项比例、平均值和汇总的 2 年无复发生存率、危险率和 95% CI:结果:共纳入七项研究,包括331名II期男性精原细胞瘤患者。在汇总分析中,复发率为 17.69%(95% CI 12.31-24.75),2 年无复发生存率为 81%(95% CI 0.77-0.86)。并发症发生率为 9.16% (95% CI 6.16-13.42),Clavien-Dindo>2并发症发生率为 8.83% (95% CI 5.76-13.31),逆行射精发生率为 7.01% (95% CI 3.54-13.40)。中位手术时间为174.68分钟(95% CI 122.17-249.76分钟),中位失血量为105.91毫升(95% CI 46.89-239.22毫升),无淋巴结受累证据的患者占0-16%:原发性RPLND治疗IIA/B期精原细胞瘤的RFS率较高,并发症和复发率较低。这些研究结果提供了证据,证明这种手术是这些患者的一种可行的替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Braz J Urol
International Braz J Urol UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
21.60%
发文量
246
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Gleason 7 (3+4) and (4+3) Prostatic Adenocarcinomas with Prognostic Criteria and Immunohistochemical Profiles of AMACR, PSA and Ki-67. Effects of Chronic Stress and Comfort Food in Testicular Morphology in Adult Wistar Rats. The Management of Children and Adolescents with Overactive Bladder Refractory to Treatment with Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. 2025: The year in which the International Brazilian Journal of Urology will be able to consolidate itself as one of the most important in urology. Advancing Telesurgery Connectivity Between North and South America: the first Remote Surgery Conducted Between Orlando and São Paulo in Animal Models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1