Characterization of an Algorithm for Autonomous, Closed-Loop Neuromodulation During Motor Rehabilitation.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1177/15459683241252599
Joseph D Epperson, Eric C Meyers, David T Pruitt, Joel M Wright, Rachael A Hudson, Emmanuel A Adehunoluwa, Y-Nhy Nguyen-Duong, Robert L Rennaker, Seth A Hays, Michael P Kilgard
{"title":"Characterization of an Algorithm for Autonomous, Closed-Loop Neuromodulation During Motor Rehabilitation.","authors":"Joseph D Epperson, Eric C Meyers, David T Pruitt, Joel M Wright, Rachael A Hudson, Emmanuel A Adehunoluwa, Y-Nhy Nguyen-Duong, Robert L Rennaker, Seth A Hays, Michael P Kilgard","doi":"10.1177/15459683241252599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence demonstrates that manually triggered vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) combined with rehabilitation leads to increased recovery of upper limb motor function after stroke. This approach is premised on studies demonstrating that the timing of stimulation relative to movements is a key determinant in the effectiveness of this approach.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The overall goal of the study was to identify an algorithm that could be used to automatically trigger VNS on the best movements during rehabilitative exercises while maintaining a desired interval between stimulations to reduce the burden of manual stimulation triggering.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To develop the algorithm, we analyzed movement data collected from patients with a history of neurological injury. We applied 3 different algorithms to the signal, analyzed their triggering choices, and then validated the best algorithm by comparing triggering choices to those selected by a therapist delivering VNS therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dynamic algorithm triggered above the 95th percentile of maximum movement at a rate of 5.09 (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.74) triggers per minute. The periodic algorithm produces stimulation at set intervals but low movement selectivity (34.05%, IQR = 7.47), while the static threshold algorithm produces long interstimulus intervals (27.16 ± 2.01 seconds) with selectivity of 64.49% (IQR = 25.38). On average, the dynamic algorithm selects movements that are 54 ± 3% larger than therapist-selected movements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that a dynamic algorithm is an effective strategy to trigger VNS during the best movements at a reliable triggering rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"493-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241252599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent evidence demonstrates that manually triggered vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) combined with rehabilitation leads to increased recovery of upper limb motor function after stroke. This approach is premised on studies demonstrating that the timing of stimulation relative to movements is a key determinant in the effectiveness of this approach.

Objective: The overall goal of the study was to identify an algorithm that could be used to automatically trigger VNS on the best movements during rehabilitative exercises while maintaining a desired interval between stimulations to reduce the burden of manual stimulation triggering.

Methods: To develop the algorithm, we analyzed movement data collected from patients with a history of neurological injury. We applied 3 different algorithms to the signal, analyzed their triggering choices, and then validated the best algorithm by comparing triggering choices to those selected by a therapist delivering VNS therapy.

Results: The dynamic algorithm triggered above the 95th percentile of maximum movement at a rate of 5.09 (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.74) triggers per minute. The periodic algorithm produces stimulation at set intervals but low movement selectivity (34.05%, IQR = 7.47), while the static threshold algorithm produces long interstimulus intervals (27.16 ± 2.01 seconds) with selectivity of 64.49% (IQR = 25.38). On average, the dynamic algorithm selects movements that are 54 ± 3% larger than therapist-selected movements.

Conclusions: This study shows that a dynamic algorithm is an effective strategy to trigger VNS during the best movements at a reliable triggering rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动康复过程中自主闭环神经调制算法的特性分析
背景:最近的证据表明,手动触发迷走神经刺激(VNS)与康复相结合可促进中风后上肢运动功能的恢复。这种方法的前提是研究表明,与运动相关的刺激时机是决定这种方法有效性的关键因素:本研究的总体目标是确定一种算法,用于在康复训练期间自动触发最佳运动的 VNS,同时保持理想的刺激间隔,以减轻人工刺激触发的负担:为了开发该算法,我们分析了从有神经损伤病史的患者身上收集到的运动数据。我们对信号采用了 3 种不同的算法,分析了它们的触发选择,然后将触发选择与提供 VNS 治疗的治疗师选择的触发选择进行比较,验证了最佳算法:动态算法以每分钟 5.09 次(四分位数间距 [IQR] = 0.74 次)的触发率在最大运动量的第 95 百分位数以上触发。周期性算法以设定的间隔进行刺激,但运动选择性较低(34.05%,IQR = 7.47),而静态阈值算法的刺激间隔时间较长(27.16 ± 2.01 秒),选择性为 64.49%(IQR = 25.38)。平均而言,动态算法选择的动作比治疗师选择的动作大 54 ± 3%:本研究表明,动态算法是一种有效的策略,能以可靠的触发率在最佳运动中触发 VNS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement Learning is Impaired in the Sub-acute Post-stroke Period. Post-Stroke Recovery in Relation to Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons and Perineuronal Nets. Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses. Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1