Urinary Incontinence in Primary Care-The Gap Between Recommendations and Real World.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001471
Julia Geynisman-Tan, Manisha Cherupally, Shaina J Alexandria, Tiffany Brown, Sarah Collins, Ashley Mathews, Havisha Pedamallu, Kimberly S Kenton, Stephen D Persell
{"title":"Urinary Incontinence in Primary Care-The Gap Between Recommendations and Real World.","authors":"Julia Geynisman-Tan, Manisha Cherupally, Shaina J Alexandria, Tiffany Brown, Sarah Collins, Ashley Mathews, Havisha Pedamallu, Kimberly S Kenton, Stephen D Persell","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Routine screening for urinary incontinence (UI) by primary care providers (PCPs) is recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to describe the rate of incident UI diagnosed at annual PCP visits, the prevalence of UI in a large primary care population, and estimate the rate of screening for UI during primary care preventive and annual wellness visits. Secondary aims were to describe PCP knowledge and behavior as they relate to UI screening and diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The electronic health record was used to abstract the number of adult female patients seen by PCPs within a regional health system with a diagnosis of UI before our study period and with a new diagnosis over a 2-year period. Additional new diagnoses and screening practices were found on chart review of an additional 824 representative charts. Primary care providers within the health system were surveyed about their screening practices and knowledge about UI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 192,053 women primary care patients seen over 2 years. A total of 5.7% had a UI diagnosis preceding the study period and 3.4% had a UI diagnosis during the study period. A total of 42% of PCPs reported that they screen for UI at least half the time and none were completely satisfied with their ability to screen for UI. Sixteen percent of annual wellness visits had any documentation of screening for UI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a large primary care population, screening for and detection of UI in women was low.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Routine screening for urinary incontinence (UI) by primary care providers (PCPs) is recommended.

Objectives: We aimed to describe the rate of incident UI diagnosed at annual PCP visits, the prevalence of UI in a large primary care population, and estimate the rate of screening for UI during primary care preventive and annual wellness visits. Secondary aims were to describe PCP knowledge and behavior as they relate to UI screening and diagnosis.

Study design: The electronic health record was used to abstract the number of adult female patients seen by PCPs within a regional health system with a diagnosis of UI before our study period and with a new diagnosis over a 2-year period. Additional new diagnoses and screening practices were found on chart review of an additional 824 representative charts. Primary care providers within the health system were surveyed about their screening practices and knowledge about UI.

Results: There were 192,053 women primary care patients seen over 2 years. A total of 5.7% had a UI diagnosis preceding the study period and 3.4% had a UI diagnosis during the study period. A total of 42% of PCPs reported that they screen for UI at least half the time and none were completely satisfied with their ability to screen for UI. Sixteen percent of annual wellness visits had any documentation of screening for UI.

Conclusion: In a large primary care population, screening for and detection of UI in women was low.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基层医疗中的尿失禁问题--建议与实际情况之间的差距。
重要性:建议初级保健提供者(PCP)对尿失禁(UI)进行常规筛查:我们旨在描述初级保健医生年度就诊中诊断出的尿失禁事件发生率、尿失禁在大型初级保健人群中的患病率,并估计初级保健预防性就诊和年度健康就诊中的尿失禁筛查率。次要目的是描述初级保健医生与尿崩症筛查和诊断有关的知识和行为:研究设计:利用电子健康记录抽取了一个地区医疗系统中初级保健医生接诊的成年女性患者人数,这些患者在我们的研究期间之前曾被诊断出患有尿崩症,并在两年内被新诊断出患有尿崩症。在对另外 824 份具有代表性的病历进行病历审查时,还发现了其他新的诊断和筛查方法。我们还对医疗系统内的初级保健提供者进行了调查,了解他们的筛查方法和对尿崩症的认识:结果:两年内,共有 192 053 名女性初级保健患者接受了治疗。共有 5.7% 的患者在研究期间之前被诊断出患有尿崩症,3.4% 的患者在研究期间被诊断出患有尿崩症。共有 42% 的初级保健医生表示,他们至少有一半的时间筛查过尿失禁,但没有人对他们筛查尿失禁的能力完全满意。16%的年度健康检查有任何关于筛查尿崩症的记录:结论:在一个庞大的初级保健人群中,女性尿崩症的筛查率和检出率都很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Simulation Model for Ureteral Stent Placement. Implementing a Digital Platform for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections. Unexpected Pathology During Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in an Urban Population. Green Cystoscopy: Does Minimizing the Use of Drapes Increase Infection Rates? Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial: KIM Sling With Reusable Trocars Versus TVT Exact Sling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1