The Effect of Concomitant Hysterectomy Route on Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes.

IF 1.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001659
Christina Swallow, Metehan Imamoglu, Aysegul Gizem Imamoglu, Xiao Xu, Oz Harmanli
{"title":"The Effect of Concomitant Hysterectomy Route on Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes.","authors":"Christina Swallow, Metehan Imamoglu, Aysegul Gizem Imamoglu, Xiao Xu, Oz Harmanli","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sacrocolpopexy is essential in the surgical management of advanced pelvic organ prolapse, and selecting the appropriate route for concomitant hysterectomy is critical.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the hysterectomy route at the time of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RA-SCP) on mesh exposure. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications and prolapse recurrence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of 405 patients who underwent an RA-SCP at our institution from January 2013 to July 2019 with at least 6 month follow-up; the patients were grouped with respect to hysterectomy route as robot-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (SCH), total vaginal hysterectomy (VH), and posthysterectomy (PH). The primary outcome measure was mesh exposure. Short-term complications and anatomic failure were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred three of our patients (50.1%) had a concomitant SCH, 93 (23.0%) had a concomitant VH, and 109 (26.9%) were PH at the time of their robotic sacrocolpopexy. Sacrocolpopexy mesh exposure occurred in 4 patients (1%), with an additional 6 patients (1.5%) with midurethral sling mesh exposure. Mesh exposure rates did not differ significantly between groups. At 6 months after surgery, anatomic failure rates did not differ significantly between groups ( P  = 0.69).Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were low (bowel obstruction, 2.0%; bladder injury, 1.2%, after excluding those caused by sling trocars; venous thromboembolism, 0.7%; transfusion, 0.5%). Postoperative infection and readmission rates did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with different routes of hysterectomy at the time of RA-SCP have similar mesh exposure and prolapse recurrence rates. Serious complications are rare in all groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"1123-1130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Sacrocolpopexy is essential in the surgical management of advanced pelvic organ prolapse, and selecting the appropriate route for concomitant hysterectomy is critical.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the hysterectomy route at the time of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RA-SCP) on mesh exposure. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications and prolapse recurrence.

Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of 405 patients who underwent an RA-SCP at our institution from January 2013 to July 2019 with at least 6 month follow-up; the patients were grouped with respect to hysterectomy route as robot-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (SCH), total vaginal hysterectomy (VH), and posthysterectomy (PH). The primary outcome measure was mesh exposure. Short-term complications and anatomic failure were also analyzed.

Results: Two hundred three of our patients (50.1%) had a concomitant SCH, 93 (23.0%) had a concomitant VH, and 109 (26.9%) were PH at the time of their robotic sacrocolpopexy. Sacrocolpopexy mesh exposure occurred in 4 patients (1%), with an additional 6 patients (1.5%) with midurethral sling mesh exposure. Mesh exposure rates did not differ significantly between groups. At 6 months after surgery, anatomic failure rates did not differ significantly between groups ( P  = 0.69).Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were low (bowel obstruction, 2.0%; bladder injury, 1.2%, after excluding those caused by sling trocars; venous thromboembolism, 0.7%; transfusion, 0.5%). Postoperative infection and readmission rates did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: Patients with different routes of hysterectomy at the time of RA-SCP have similar mesh exposure and prolapse recurrence rates. Serious complications are rare in all groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时子宫切除路径对机器人骶髋固定术疗效的影响。
重要性:骶colpop固定术在晚期盆腔器官脱垂的手术治疗中是必不可少的,选择合适的途径进行子宫切除术是至关重要的。目的:本研究的目的是评估机器人辅助腹腔镜骶colpop固定术(RA-SCP)时子宫切除路径对补片暴露的影响。次要结果为围手术期并发症及脱垂复发。研究设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2013年1月至2019年7月在我院接受RA-SCP治疗的405例患者,随访至少6个月;将患者按子宫切除方式分为机器人辅助宫颈上子宫切除术(SCH)、阴道全子宫切除术(VH)和后子宫切除术(PH)。主要结局指标是网状物暴露。并对短期并发症及解剖失败进行了分析。结果:我们的患者中有203例(50.1%)合并SCH, 93例(23.0%)合并VH, 109例(26.9%)在机器人骶髋固定术时伴有PH。骶colpop固定术网片暴露4例(1%),尿道中吊带网片暴露6例(1.5%)。各组间网状物暴露率无显著差异。术后6个月,两组解剖失败率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.69)。术中术后并发症发生率低(肠梗阻2.0%;排除套管针引起的膀胱损伤,1.2%;静脉血栓栓塞,0.7%;输血,0.5%)。术后感染和再入院率组间无显著差异。结论:RA-SCP手术时不同子宫切除术方式的患者网片暴露和脱垂复发率相似。严重并发症在所有组中都很少见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of AI-Generated Surgical Decision Aids for Pelvic Floor Disorders. The Role of EMMPRIN Levels in Uterine Ligaments in Pelvic Organ Prolapse. The Utility of Simple Cystometry. Age and Perioperative Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy. Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain With Palpation and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1