In vitro efficacy of combinations of antibiotics used in clinical practice on clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Helicobacter Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1111/hel.13081
Zahyra Kaouah, Julien M. Buyck, Maxime Pichon, Christophe Burucoa, Laure Prouvensier, Jeremy Moreau, Sandrine Marchand, Julie Cremniter, Nicolas Grégoire
{"title":"In vitro efficacy of combinations of antibiotics used in clinical practice on clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori","authors":"Zahyra Kaouah,&nbsp;Julien M. Buyck,&nbsp;Maxime Pichon,&nbsp;Christophe Burucoa,&nbsp;Laure Prouvensier,&nbsp;Jeremy Moreau,&nbsp;Sandrine Marchand,&nbsp;Julie Cremniter,&nbsp;Nicolas Grégoire","doi":"10.1111/hel.13081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The main antibiotics used against <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> have been chosen empirically over time, with few preclinical studies to provide support. The rise in resistance to some of these antibiotics is prompting a reassessment of their use. This work aimed to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of 2 × 2 combinations of the most widely used antibiotics against <i>H. pylori</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>J99 reference strains and 19 clinical isolates of <i>H. pylori</i> with various antibiotic resistance phenotypes were used. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were carried out using the microdilution method in 96-well plates. The activity of 15 possible combinations of two antibiotics including amoxicillin, clarithromycin (CLA), levofloxacin, rifampicin, tetracycline, and metronidazole was determined for all strains by the checkerboard method. A mean fractional inhibitory concentration index (FIC<sub>mean</sub>) was calculated for each combination and strain and the type of pharmacodynamic interaction was considered as synergic if FIC<sub>mean</sub> ≤ 0.5, additive if 0.5 &lt; FIC<sub>mean</sub> ≤ 1, indifferent if 1 &lt; FIC<sub>mean</sub> &lt; 4 or antagonistic if FIC<sub>mean</sub> ≥ 4.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most of the 285 pharmacodynamic interactions tested with clinical strains were close to additivity (average FIC<sub>mean</sub> = 0.89 [0.38–1.28]). No interaction was found to be antagonistic. When two antibiotics to which a strain was resistant were combined, the concentrations required to inhibit bacterial growth were higher than their respective breakpoints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The present results have shown that in vitro, the different antibiotics used in therapeutics have additive effects. The addition of the effects of two antibiotics to which a strain was resistant was not sufficient to inhibit bacterial growth. In probabilistic treatment, the choice of antibiotics to combine should therefore be based on the local epidemiology of resistance, and on susceptibility testing in the case of CLA therapy, so that at least one antibiotic to which the strain is susceptible is used.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13223,"journal":{"name":"Helicobacter","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hel.13081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helicobacter","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hel.13081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The main antibiotics used against Helicobacter pylori have been chosen empirically over time, with few preclinical studies to provide support. The rise in resistance to some of these antibiotics is prompting a reassessment of their use. This work aimed to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of 2 × 2 combinations of the most widely used antibiotics against H. pylori.

Materials and Methods

J99 reference strains and 19 clinical isolates of H. pylori with various antibiotic resistance phenotypes were used. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were carried out using the microdilution method in 96-well plates. The activity of 15 possible combinations of two antibiotics including amoxicillin, clarithromycin (CLA), levofloxacin, rifampicin, tetracycline, and metronidazole was determined for all strains by the checkerboard method. A mean fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICmean) was calculated for each combination and strain and the type of pharmacodynamic interaction was considered as synergic if FICmean ≤ 0.5, additive if 0.5 < FICmean ≤ 1, indifferent if 1 < FICmean < 4 or antagonistic if FICmean ≥ 4.

Results

Most of the 285 pharmacodynamic interactions tested with clinical strains were close to additivity (average FICmean = 0.89 [0.38–1.28]). No interaction was found to be antagonistic. When two antibiotics to which a strain was resistant were combined, the concentrations required to inhibit bacterial growth were higher than their respective breakpoints.

Conclusion

The present results have shown that in vitro, the different antibiotics used in therapeutics have additive effects. The addition of the effects of two antibiotics to which a strain was resistant was not sufficient to inhibit bacterial growth. In probabilistic treatment, the choice of antibiotics to combine should therefore be based on the local epidemiology of resistance, and on susceptibility testing in the case of CLA therapy, so that at least one antibiotic to which the strain is susceptible is used.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床实践中使用的抗生素组合对幽门螺旋杆菌临床分离株的体外疗效。
背景:针对幽门螺旋杆菌的主要抗生素是长期以来根据经验选择的,很少有临床前研究提供支持。其中一些抗生素耐药性的增加促使人们对其使用进行重新评估。这项工作旨在评估最广泛使用的抗生素的 2 × 2 组合对幽门螺杆菌的体外疗效:材料和方法:使用 J99 参考菌株和 19 个具有不同抗生素耐药性表型的幽门螺杆菌临床分离株。采用微量稀释法在 96 孔板中测定最小抑菌浓度。采用棋盘格法测定了所有菌株的两种抗生素(包括阿莫西林、克拉霉素(CLA)、左氧氟沙星、利福平、四环素和甲硝唑)的 15 种可能组合的活性。计算每种组合和菌株的平均分数抑制浓度指数(FICmean),如果 FICmean≤0.5 则认为药效学相互作用类型为协同作用,如果 0.5 平均值≤1 则认为药效学相互作用类型为相加作用,如果 1 平均值≥4 则认为药效学相互作用类型为无关作用:用临床菌株测试的 285 种药效学相互作用中,大多数接近相加性(平均 FICmean = 0.89 [0.38-1.28])。没有发现任何相互作用是拮抗的。当两种对菌株耐药的抗生素联合使用时,抑制细菌生长所需的浓度高于它们各自的断点:本研究结果表明,在体外,用于治疗的不同抗生素具有相加效应。对一种菌株具有抗药性的两种抗生素的叠加效应不足以抑制细菌生长。因此,在进行概率治疗时,应根据当地的抗药性流行病学情况和 CLA 治疗时的药敏试验来选择联合使用的抗生素,以便至少使用一种菌株易感的抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Helicobacter
Helicobacter 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Helicobacter is edited by Professor David Y Graham. The editorial and peer review process is an independent process. Whenever there is a conflict of interest, the editor and editorial board will declare their interests and affiliations. Helicobacter recognises the critical role that has been established for Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and primary gastric lymphoma. As new helicobacter species are now regularly being discovered, Helicobacter covers the entire range of helicobacter research, increasing communication among the fields of gastroenterology; microbiology; vaccine development; laboratory animal science.
期刊最新文献
Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children: To Eradicate or Not to Eradicate? Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden Helicobacter pylori Management in Africa: A Survey of Diagnostic, Treatment, and Related Resources LCI's Diagnostic Performance for Gastric Cancer: A New Solution to Screening? Nationwide Trends in Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapies in Korea: Impact of Guideline Updates on Treatment Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1