Information-seeking behaviour in patients exploring orthognathic surgery: A qualitative study.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1177/14653125241249494
Nicola Wade, Ninu Paul, Nathan Nagar, Sarah Rolland, Sarah Germain
{"title":"Information-seeking behaviour in patients exploring orthognathic surgery: A qualitative study.","authors":"Nicola Wade, Ninu Paul, Nathan Nagar, Sarah Rolland, Sarah Germain","doi":"10.1177/14653125241249494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how orthognathic patients seek information during decision-making.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A hospital in Cumbria, UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Prospective orthognathic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were purposively recruited from joint orthognathic clinics after the original consultation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via remote video call with nine participants aged 18-30 years. Data collection and reflexive thematic analysis occurred in parallel until thematic saturation was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The central finding of this research was that patients were making informed decisions about orthognathic surgery. Four themes were identified to support this central finding including the following: (1) selective engagement with orthognathic information sources; (2) the central role of patient-specific information from professionals and peers; (3) Internet use to supplement standard information resources; and (4) concerns over information found online. The preferred source of information was verbal from the clinical team as it was trusted and person-specific. Past patients were identified as valued sources of information and establishing contact through digital social media networks was found to be a convenient alternative to face-to-face. Online information found was valued but concerns included information overload, problems establishing applicability and concerns over its credibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orthognathic patients were making informed decisions about their treatment. This study highlights the central role of the patient-clinician interaction in decision-making, especially in providing patient-specific information. Insight into the nuances of information-seeking behaviours will better inform clinical care. Since patients frequently access online information that is decision-relevant, encouraging patients to discuss online searches will support the shared decision-making process and alleviate any concerns with information found. During consultation, explaining the purpose of an information aid rather than expecting patients to read them separately, may further enhance its usefulness in decision-making. This study identified an unmet need for visual aids, such as real-time images of postoperative recovery. These findings can inform the design of future information resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241249494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore how orthognathic patients seek information during decision-making.

Design: Qualitative, cross-sectional study.

Setting: A hospital in Cumbria, UK.

Participants: Prospective orthognathic patients.

Methods: Participants were purposively recruited from joint orthognathic clinics after the original consultation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via remote video call with nine participants aged 18-30 years. Data collection and reflexive thematic analysis occurred in parallel until thematic saturation was achieved.

Results: The central finding of this research was that patients were making informed decisions about orthognathic surgery. Four themes were identified to support this central finding including the following: (1) selective engagement with orthognathic information sources; (2) the central role of patient-specific information from professionals and peers; (3) Internet use to supplement standard information resources; and (4) concerns over information found online. The preferred source of information was verbal from the clinical team as it was trusted and person-specific. Past patients were identified as valued sources of information and establishing contact through digital social media networks was found to be a convenient alternative to face-to-face. Online information found was valued but concerns included information overload, problems establishing applicability and concerns over its credibility.

Conclusion: Orthognathic patients were making informed decisions about their treatment. This study highlights the central role of the patient-clinician interaction in decision-making, especially in providing patient-specific information. Insight into the nuances of information-seeking behaviours will better inform clinical care. Since patients frequently access online information that is decision-relevant, encouraging patients to discuss online searches will support the shared decision-making process and alleviate any concerns with information found. During consultation, explaining the purpose of an information aid rather than expecting patients to read them separately, may further enhance its usefulness in decision-making. This study identified an unmet need for visual aids, such as real-time images of postoperative recovery. These findings can inform the design of future information resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正颌外科手术患者的信息搜索行为:定性研究。
目的探讨正颌患者在决策过程中如何寻求信息:定性、横断面研究:参与者:前瞻性正颌患者:前瞻性正颌患者:方法:在原始咨询后,有目的地从正颌联合诊所招募参与者。通过远程视频通话对 9 名 18-30 岁的参与者进行了半结构化访谈。数据收集和反思性主题分析同时进行,直至达到主题饱和:本研究的核心发现是,患者对正颌外科手术做出了知情决定。为支持这一中心结论,确定了四个主题,包括以下内容:(1) 选择性地使用正颌外科手术信息来源;(2) 来自专业人士和同行的患者特定信息的核心作用;(3) 使用互联网补充标准信息资源;(4) 对网上信息的担忧。首选的信息来源是来自临床团队的口头信息,因为这种信息既可信又针对个人。过去的病人被认为是有价值的信息来源,通过数字社交媒体网络建立联系被认为是比面对面交流更方便的选择。网上信息受到重视,但也存在一些问题,包括信息过载、适用性问题以及对其可信度的担忧:结论:正颌患者在治疗方面做出了明智的决定。这项研究强调了患者与医生互动在决策中的核心作用,尤其是在提供患者特定信息方面。洞察信息搜索行为的细微差别将为临床治疗提供更好的信息。由于患者经常访问与决策相关的在线信息,鼓励患者讨论在线搜索将支持共同决策过程,并减轻对所发现信息的担忧。在咨询过程中,向患者解释信息辅助工具的目的,而不是期望患者单独阅读,可以进一步提高其在决策中的作用。本研究发现了对视觉辅助工具(如术后恢复的实时图像)的需求尚未得到满足。这些发现可为未来信息资源的设计提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontics
Journal of Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthodontics has an international circulation, publishing papers from throughout the world. The official journal of the British Orthodontic Society, it aims to publish high quality, evidence-based, clinically orientated or clinically relevant original research papers that will underpin evidence based orthodontic care. It particularly welcomes reports on prospective research into different treatment methods and techniques but also systematic reviews, meta-analyses and studies which will stimulate interest in new developments. Regular features include original papers on clinically relevant topics, clinical case reports, reviews of the orthodontic literature, editorials, book reviews, correspondence and other features of interest to the orthodontic community. The Journal is published in full colour throughout.
期刊最新文献
Is occlusal contact re-established within 6 months after bonding of a fixed anterior bite plane in adolescents with a Class II division 2 incisor relationship? A randomised controlled trial. A national survey of current practice in pre-alveolar bone graft orthodontics in the United Kingdom. Does enamel deproteinisation with 10% papain affect shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives: a randomised controlled trial. Multidisciplinary treatment of a patient with TMJ ankylosis and a severe dentofacial discrepancy: A case report. Orthodontic alignment of ankylosed teeth with aid of surgical luxation: Case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1