Landing a global report on national territories: the reception of AR6 in France and Switzerland

Adèle Gaveau
{"title":"Landing a global report on national territories: the reception of AR6 in France and Switzerland","authors":"Adèle Gaveau","doi":"10.1038/s44168-024-00112-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the reception of the IPCC reports on a national scale, focusing on the case of the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) in France and Switzerland. It sheds light on the orchestration processes of national reception by the actors involved in the two science-policy interfaces, and introduces the theoretical concept of “landing” for the comparative analysis. Using mixed qualitative methods, it reveals that in both case studies, the domestic science-policy interactions stemming from the landing deviated significantly from expectations. Unusual actors different from the IPCC National Focal Points got involved in framing the conditions of the report’s domestic reception, and AR6 faced challenges when entering national Parliament. The results are discussed within the broader context of a global reflection on the imperative to enhance the dissemination channels of the IPCC scientific results to political audiences.","PeriodicalId":186004,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate Action","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00112-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00112-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the reception of the IPCC reports on a national scale, focusing on the case of the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) in France and Switzerland. It sheds light on the orchestration processes of national reception by the actors involved in the two science-policy interfaces, and introduces the theoretical concept of “landing” for the comparative analysis. Using mixed qualitative methods, it reveals that in both case studies, the domestic science-policy interactions stemming from the landing deviated significantly from expectations. Unusual actors different from the IPCC National Focal Points got involved in framing the conditions of the report’s domestic reception, and AR6 faced challenges when entering national Parliament. The results are discussed within the broader context of a global reflection on the imperative to enhance the dissemination channels of the IPCC scientific results to political audiences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将全球报告落地到国家领土:法国和瑞士对第六次评估报告的接受情况
本文以法国和瑞士对《第六次评估报告》(AR6)的接受情况为重点,探讨了各国对 IPCC 报告的接受情况。文章揭示了参与这两个科学政策界面的行动者对国家接收的协调过程,并为比较分析引入了 "落地 "的理论概念。该报告采用混合定性方法,揭示了在两个案例研究中,由 "落地 "产生的国内科学政策互动与预期大相径庭。不同于 IPCC 国家协调中心的不寻常参与者参与了报告国内接收条件的制定,《第六次评估报告》在进入国家议会时面临挑战。这些结果将在更广泛的背景下进行讨论,即对加强 IPCC 科学成果向政治受众传播渠道的必要性进行全球反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What, how and where: an assessment of multi-level European climate mitigation policies Applications of generative artificial intelligence to influence climate change decisions Shifting and sharing power in urban climate justice work: experiments in transformative learning in Vancouver, Canada Author Correction: From countercultural ecovillages to mainstream green neighbourhoods—a view on current trends in Denmark Divergence over solutions to adapt or transform Australia’s Great Barrier Reef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1