Divergence over solutions to adapt or transform Australia’s Great Barrier Reef

Abstract

There is increasing agreement among Australian policymakers and stakeholders that climate change is the biggest problem facing the Great Barrier Reef. However, little is known about whether this convergence shapes perspectives on solutions. To understand different actor perspectives on climate solutions for the Great Barrier Reef, we applied a ‘problem-solution’ framework employing Q-methodology to guide in-depth interviews with engaged actors. We found that despite growing convergence over the problem, significant divergence over the solutions remains. We identified six generalised perspectives on climate solutions ranging from technology-led adaptation at one end of the spectrum to radical climate transitions at the other. We found that support for market-led, regionally-led, and radical climate transitions represents a new shift toward transformational policy solutions beyond the conventional bounds of GBR governance. However, the multiple divergent perspectives suggest that more reflexive learning is required to effectively govern this critical ecosystem into the future.