Diagnostic Yield of Decubitus CT Myelography for Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas.

Jacob T Gibby, Timothy J Amrhein, Derek S Young, Jessica L Houk, Peter G Kranz
{"title":"Diagnostic Yield of Decubitus CT Myelography for Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas.","authors":"Jacob T Gibby, Timothy J Amrhein, Derek S Young, Jessica L Houk, Peter G Kranz","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Various imaging techniques have been described to detect CSF-venous fistulas in the setting of spontaneous intracranial hypotension, including decubitus CT myelography. The expected diagnostic yield of decubitus CT myelography for CSF-venous fistula detection is not fully established. The purpose of this study was to assess the yield of decubitus CT myelography among consecutive patients presenting for evaluation of possible spontaneous intracranial hypotension and to examine the impact of brain MR imaging findings of spontaneous intracranial hypotension on the diagnostic yield.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included a single-center, retrospective cohort of consecutive patients presenting during a 1-year period who underwent CT myelography and had no CSF identified in the epidural space. Patients with epidural CSF leaks were included in a secondary cohort. Subjects were grouped according to positioning for the myelogram, either decubitus or prone, and the presence of imaging findings of spontaneous intracranial hypotension on preprocedural brain MR imaging. Diagnostic yields for each subgroup were calculated, and the yield of decubitus CT myelography was compared with that of prone CT myelography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort comprised 302 subjects, including 247 patients with no epidural fluid. The diagnostic yield of decubitus CT myelography for CSF-venous fistula detection among subjects with positive brain MR imaging findings and no epidural fluid was 73%. No CSF-venous fistulas were identified among subjects with negative findings on brain imaging. Among subjects with an epidural leak, brain MR imaging was negative for signs of spontaneous intracranial hypotension in 22%. Prone CT myelography identified a CSF-venous fistula less commonly than decubitus CT myelography (43% versus 73%, <i>P </i>= .19), though the difference was not statistically significant in this small subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found the diagnostic yield of decubitus CT myelography to be similar to the yield previously reported for digital subtraction myelography among patients with positive findings on brain imaging. No CSF-venous fistulas were identified in patients with negative findings on brain imaging; epidural CSF leaks accounted for all cases of patients who had spontaneous intracranial hypotension with negative brain imaging findings. This study provides useful data for counseling patients and helps establish a general benchmark for the decubitus CT myelography yield for CSF-venous fistula detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Various imaging techniques have been described to detect CSF-venous fistulas in the setting of spontaneous intracranial hypotension, including decubitus CT myelography. The expected diagnostic yield of decubitus CT myelography for CSF-venous fistula detection is not fully established. The purpose of this study was to assess the yield of decubitus CT myelography among consecutive patients presenting for evaluation of possible spontaneous intracranial hypotension and to examine the impact of brain MR imaging findings of spontaneous intracranial hypotension on the diagnostic yield.

Materials and methods: The study included a single-center, retrospective cohort of consecutive patients presenting during a 1-year period who underwent CT myelography and had no CSF identified in the epidural space. Patients with epidural CSF leaks were included in a secondary cohort. Subjects were grouped according to positioning for the myelogram, either decubitus or prone, and the presence of imaging findings of spontaneous intracranial hypotension on preprocedural brain MR imaging. Diagnostic yields for each subgroup were calculated, and the yield of decubitus CT myelography was compared with that of prone CT myelography.

Results: The study cohort comprised 302 subjects, including 247 patients with no epidural fluid. The diagnostic yield of decubitus CT myelography for CSF-venous fistula detection among subjects with positive brain MR imaging findings and no epidural fluid was 73%. No CSF-venous fistulas were identified among subjects with negative findings on brain imaging. Among subjects with an epidural leak, brain MR imaging was negative for signs of spontaneous intracranial hypotension in 22%. Prone CT myelography identified a CSF-venous fistula less commonly than decubitus CT myelography (43% versus 73%, P = .19), though the difference was not statistically significant in this small subgroup.

Conclusions: We found the diagnostic yield of decubitus CT myelography to be similar to the yield previously reported for digital subtraction myelography among patients with positive findings on brain imaging. No CSF-venous fistulas were identified in patients with negative findings on brain imaging; epidural CSF leaks accounted for all cases of patients who had spontaneous intracranial hypotension with negative brain imaging findings. This study provides useful data for counseling patients and helps establish a general benchmark for the decubitus CT myelography yield for CSF-venous fistula detection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于检测脑脊液-静脉瘘的褥疮 CT 髓造影诊断率
背景和目的:已有多种成像技术用于检测自发性颅内低血压(SIH)时的 CSF-Venous 管(CVF),包括褥疮 CT 髓造影(dCTM)。dCTM 对 CVF 检测的预期诊断率尚未完全确定。本研究旨在评估连续就诊的 SIH 患者的 dCTM 诊断率,并研究 SIH 的脑磁共振成像结果对诊断率的影响:单中心回顾性队列:对一年内连续就诊的患者进行 CTM 检查,未在硬膜外腔发现 CSF。硬膜外CSF渗漏患者被纳入第二组群。受试者根据脊髓造影的体位(卧位或俯卧位)以及术前脑部核磁共振成像(MRI)是否发现 SIH 而分组。计算每个分组的诊断率,并将dCTM的诊断率与俯卧位CTM的诊断率进行比较:研究队列包括 302 名受试者,其中 247 名患者无硬膜外积液。在脑部磁共振成像呈阳性且无硬膜外积液的受试者中,dCTM 检测 CVF 的诊断率为 73%。在脑部成像阴性的受试者中未发现 CVF。在有硬膜外渗漏的受试者中,有 22% 的人脑磁共振成像对 SIH 征兆呈阴性。俯卧位 CTM 发现 CVF 的比例低于 dCTM(43% 对 73%,P=0.19),但在这一小部分人中差异无统计学意义:我们发现,在脑成像阳性的患者中,dCTM 的诊断率与之前报道的数字减影髓鞘造影的诊断率相似。在脑成像阴性的患者中未发现 CVF;在脑成像阴性的 SIH 患者中,硬膜外 CSF 漏占了所有病例。这项研究为咨询患者提供了有用的数据,并有助于为检测 CVF 的 dCTM 收率建立一个通用基准:SIH = 自发性颅内低血压;CVF = CSF-静脉瘘;CTM = CT 髓造影;dCTM = 卧位 CT 髓造影;EBP = 硬膜外血补片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pretreatment Perfusion Imaging Parameters With 90-Day Excellent Functional Outcomes in Anterior Circulation Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke. Deep learning-based algorithm for automatic quantification of nigrosome-1 and Parkinsonism classification using susceptibility map-weighted MRI. High wall shear stress is related to complicated AHA lesion type VI plaques in mild to moderate internal carotid artery stenosis - a 3D cardiovascular MRI study. Prevalence of Spinal Meningeal Diverticula in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Comprehensive Review of Inner Ear Anatomy on Photon-Counting CT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1