Indications and outcomes of liver transplantation for liver tumors in the United States

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100245
Kenji Okumura, Abhay Dhand, Kamil Hanna, Ryosuke Misawa, Hiroshi Sogawa, Gregory Veillette, Seigo Nishida
{"title":"Indications and outcomes of liver transplantation for liver tumors in the United States","authors":"Kenji Okumura,&nbsp;Abhay Dhand,&nbsp;Kamil Hanna,&nbsp;Ryosuke Misawa,&nbsp;Hiroshi Sogawa,&nbsp;Gregory Veillette,&nbsp;Seigo Nishida","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the leading cause of liver transplant (LT) for liver tumors, indications have broadened over the years. Data regarding patient characteristics and outcomes of LT for liver tumors are limited.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From Jan-2002 to March-2022, 14,406 LT recipients for various liver tumors were identified in United Network for Organ Sharing database. Overall post-transplant survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, indications for LT for various hepatic tumors were HCC (88.5 %), benign tumors (5.1 %), cholangiocarcinoma (3.9 %), angiosarcoma (0.7 %), bile duct cancer (0.7 %), secondary tumors (0.5 %) and others (0.7 %). Compared to non-HCC, LT recipients for HCC were older (median age 61 vs 54 years, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), more often male (77% vs 48 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), more often Hispanic (16% vs 8.0 %), had higher BMI (28.2 vs 25.3, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and higher prevalence of Hepatitis C (53% vs 3.9 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Donor characteristics across various groups were similar. One-year survival in LT recipients of HCC was higher (HCC: 91.7% vs. non-HCC: 90.3 %) with adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) of 0.87; 95 % CI 0.77–0.99, <em>P</em> = 0.033 in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Compared to HCC, survival outcomes were worse in cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 1.70; 95 %CI 1.43–2.01, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), bile duct cancer (aHR 3.03; 95 %CI 2.12–4.33, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), secondary tumors including colon cancer and neuroendocrine tumors (aHR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.24–2.85, <em>P</em> = 0.003), with best survival in patients with benign tumors (aHR 0.57; 95 %CI 0.46–0.70, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LT is performed for various liver tumors with variable outcomes among these primary indications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000123/pdfft?md5=6edd88d1fb293f935ce91927c2c3c344&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000123-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the leading cause of liver transplant (LT) for liver tumors, indications have broadened over the years. Data regarding patient characteristics and outcomes of LT for liver tumors are limited.

Methods

From Jan-2002 to March-2022, 14,406 LT recipients for various liver tumors were identified in United Network for Organ Sharing database. Overall post-transplant survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model.

Results

During the study period, indications for LT for various hepatic tumors were HCC (88.5 %), benign tumors (5.1 %), cholangiocarcinoma (3.9 %), angiosarcoma (0.7 %), bile duct cancer (0.7 %), secondary tumors (0.5 %) and others (0.7 %). Compared to non-HCC, LT recipients for HCC were older (median age 61 vs 54 years, P < 0.001), more often male (77% vs 48 %, P < 0.001), more often Hispanic (16% vs 8.0 %), had higher BMI (28.2 vs 25.3, P < 0.001) and higher prevalence of Hepatitis C (53% vs 3.9 %, P < 0.001). Donor characteristics across various groups were similar. One-year survival in LT recipients of HCC was higher (HCC: 91.7% vs. non-HCC: 90.3 %) with adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) of 0.87; 95 % CI 0.77–0.99, P = 0.033 in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Compared to HCC, survival outcomes were worse in cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 1.70; 95 %CI 1.43–2.01, P < 0.001), bile duct cancer (aHR 3.03; 95 %CI 2.12–4.33, P < 0.001), secondary tumors including colon cancer and neuroendocrine tumors (aHR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.24–2.85, P = 0.003), with best survival in patients with benign tumors (aHR 0.57; 95 %CI 0.46–0.70, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

LT is performed for various liver tumors with variable outcomes among these primary indications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国肝脏肿瘤肝移植的适应症和结果
背景虽然肝细胞癌(HCC)仍是肝脏肿瘤肝移植(LT)的主要病因,但多年来适应症已有所扩大。方法从2002年1月至2022年3月,器官共享联合网络数据库共收集了14406例因各种肝脏肿瘤接受肝移植的患者。结果在研究期间,各种肝肿瘤的LT适应症为HCC(88.5%)、良性肿瘤(5.1%)、胆管癌(3.9%)、血管肉瘤(0.7%)、胆管癌(0.7%)、继发性肿瘤(0.5%)和其他(0.7%)。与非 HCC 相比,HCC 的 LT 受体年龄更大(中位年龄 61 岁对 54 岁,P < 0.001),男性更多(77% 对 48%,P < 0.001),西班牙裔更多(16% 对 8.0%),体重指数更高(28.2 对 25.3,P < 0.001),丙型肝炎患病率更高(53% 对 3.9%,P < 0.001)。各组别的供体特征相似。在多变量考克斯回归分析中,HCC LT受者的一年生存率更高(HCC:91.7% vs. 非HCC:90.3%),调整后危险比(aHR)为0.87;95 % CI 0.77-0.99,P = 0.033。与 HCC 相比,胆管癌(aHR 1.70; 95 %CI 1.43-2.01,P <0.001)、胆管癌(aHR 3.03; 95 %CI 2.12-4.33,P <0.001)、包括结肠癌和神经内分泌肿瘤在内的继发性肿瘤(aHR 1.88;95 %CI 1.24-2.85,P = 0.003),良性肿瘤患者的生存率最高(aHR 0.57;95 %CI 0.46-0.70,P <;0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review Letter to the Editor on “The pulmonary contusion score: Development of asimple scoring system for blunt lung injury” Prevalence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain in adult surgical patients: A prospective study Advances and results in omental patch repair of gastrointestinal perforations: A narrative review Practical evaluation of risk factors in patients with osteoporosis-induced thoracic and lumbar vertebral compression fractures requiring surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1