Achieving sustainable crop management: A holistic approach to crop competitiveness assessment and structure optimization with dual natural-social environmental impacts

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103968
Shimeng Ma , Coen J. Ritsema , Sufen Wang
{"title":"Achieving sustainable crop management: A holistic approach to crop competitiveness assessment and structure optimization with dual natural-social environmental impacts","authors":"Shimeng Ma ,&nbsp;Coen J. Ritsema ,&nbsp;Sufen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Improving the spatial pattern of agricultural systems has become a promising approach for enhancing agricultural productivity and sustainability. However, previous studies have often focused on the influence of natural factors on crop distribution, ignoring factors such as human activities, socio-economic level and ecological environment.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>This study aims to investigate the influence of natural factors and social environmental drivers on the optimal pattern of multiple crops and evaluate the potential of optimal patterns to enhance agricultural productivity and sustainability.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Here, we present a multi-criteria approach integrating natural and social environment system factors and set up three assessment scenarios: crop growth suitability (CGS), crop planting suitability (CPS), and crop planting competitiveness (CPC). Applying this approach to the Shiyang River basin in China as a case study, we assessed the suitability and competitiveness of single crops. To maximize agriculture competitiveness, we optimized the structure of the multi-crop system, and a method was proposed to identify highly suitable intercropping areas using crop competitiveness conflicts. Regional crop water consumption, water productivity, and economic benefits were calculated to analyze the potential for agricultural intensification under different optimization patterns.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>We found that the weights of four categories factors of location, socio-economic conditions, productivity, and environment protection accounted for 26.9%, 7.5%, 13.7%, and 4.5%, respectively, and the weight of social environmental influence indicators had accounted for about 43.5%, which cannot be ignored. The distribution area above moderate suitability (L2) in the CPS and CPC scenarios was about 7.92% - 30.03% and 6.14% - 26.4% higher than the CGS scenario, respectively. Social environmental factors are important to consider in assessing the suitability of crops. From the spatial structure, three optimization patterns all suggested increasing the planting proportion of wheat and potato in the future. The optimization patterns in CPC scenario could reduce total crop water demand by 91.86 to 175.77 million cubic meters compared with 2020 while showing great potential to improve crop water productivity and net output per cubic meter of water. Furthermore, we offered recommendations for the layouts of common intercropping systems in Northwest China based on the proposed method for identifying high suitability zones.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>This study emphasizes the importance of considering multiple environments to accurately assess crop suitability and achieve sustainable agricultural. The results could provide useful insights for managing and optimizing diverse planting systems, addressing growing concerns surrounding food and water security in resource-constrained regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24001185","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Improving the spatial pattern of agricultural systems has become a promising approach for enhancing agricultural productivity and sustainability. However, previous studies have often focused on the influence of natural factors on crop distribution, ignoring factors such as human activities, socio-economic level and ecological environment.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the influence of natural factors and social environmental drivers on the optimal pattern of multiple crops and evaluate the potential of optimal patterns to enhance agricultural productivity and sustainability.

METHODS

Here, we present a multi-criteria approach integrating natural and social environment system factors and set up three assessment scenarios: crop growth suitability (CGS), crop planting suitability (CPS), and crop planting competitiveness (CPC). Applying this approach to the Shiyang River basin in China as a case study, we assessed the suitability and competitiveness of single crops. To maximize agriculture competitiveness, we optimized the structure of the multi-crop system, and a method was proposed to identify highly suitable intercropping areas using crop competitiveness conflicts. Regional crop water consumption, water productivity, and economic benefits were calculated to analyze the potential for agricultural intensification under different optimization patterns.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We found that the weights of four categories factors of location, socio-economic conditions, productivity, and environment protection accounted for 26.9%, 7.5%, 13.7%, and 4.5%, respectively, and the weight of social environmental influence indicators had accounted for about 43.5%, which cannot be ignored. The distribution area above moderate suitability (L2) in the CPS and CPC scenarios was about 7.92% - 30.03% and 6.14% - 26.4% higher than the CGS scenario, respectively. Social environmental factors are important to consider in assessing the suitability of crops. From the spatial structure, three optimization patterns all suggested increasing the planting proportion of wheat and potato in the future. The optimization patterns in CPC scenario could reduce total crop water demand by 91.86 to 175.77 million cubic meters compared with 2020 while showing great potential to improve crop water productivity and net output per cubic meter of water. Furthermore, we offered recommendations for the layouts of common intercropping systems in Northwest China based on the proposed method for identifying high suitability zones.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study emphasizes the importance of considering multiple environments to accurately assess crop suitability and achieve sustainable agricultural. The results could provide useful insights for managing and optimizing diverse planting systems, addressing growing concerns surrounding food and water security in resource-constrained regions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现可持续作物管理:作物竞争力评估和结构优化的整体方法,兼顾自然和社会环境的双重影响
内容提要 改善农业系统的空间格局已成为提高农业生产率和可持续性的一种有前途的方法。然而,以往的研究往往侧重于自然因素对作物分布的影响,而忽略了人类活动、社会经济水平和生态环境等因素。方法本文提出了一种综合自然和社会环境系统因素的多标准方法,并设定了三种评估情景:作物生长适宜性(CGS)、作物种植适宜性(CPS)和作物种植竞争力(CPC)。以中国石羊河流域为例,我们采用这种方法评估了单一作物的适宜性和竞争力。为了最大限度地提高农业竞争力,我们优化了多作物系统结构,并提出了一种利用作物竞争力冲突识别高度适宜间作区域的方法。结果与结论 我们发现,区位、社会经济条件、生产力和环境保护四类因素的权重分别占 26.9%、7.5%、13.7% 和 4.5%,社会环境影响指标的权重约占 43.5%,这一点不容忽视。与 CGS 方案相比,CPS 方案和 CPC 方案中中等适宜度(L2)以上的分布面积分别高出约 7.92%-30.03% 和 6.14%-26.4% 。社会环境因素是评估农作物适宜性的重要考虑因素。从空间结构来看,三种优化模式均建议未来增加小麦和马铃薯的种植比例。与 2020 年相比,CPC 情景下的优化模式可使作物总需水量减少 9 186 万至 1.7577 亿立方米,同时在提高作物水分生产率和每立方米水的净产出方面显示出巨大潜力。此外,根据所提出的高适宜性区域识别方法,我们还为西北地区常见间作系统的布局提出了建议。研究结果可为管理和优化多样化种植系统提供有用的见解,从而解决资源有限地区日益增长的粮食和水安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Regional-scale trade-offs among beef production, emissions and land use impacts: A cattle diet composition perspective Perceived resilience of community supported agriculture in Germany Integrating production, ecology and livelihood confers an efficiency-driven farming system based on the sustainable farmland framework Eco-efficiency in the agricultural landscape of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany Developing a sustainable assessment framework for identifying industrial water suitability: Perspective on the water-energy-food nexus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1