Lived experiences of end-of-life care at home in the UK: a scoping review of qualitative research.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2023.0349
Claire Clark, Stephen Fenning, Wendy Haynes, Sarah Clay, Jack Maddicks, Joanna Bowden
{"title":"Lived experiences of end-of-life care at home in the UK: a scoping review of qualitative research.","authors":"Claire Clark, Stephen Fenning, Wendy Haynes, Sarah Clay, Jack Maddicks, Joanna Bowden","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2023.0349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home is the preferred place of care and death for most people with advanced illness.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine and describe the published qualitative literature on the lived experiences of dying at home, to characterise the participants and their contexts, and to identify key gaps in knowledge, with a view to informing future research.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A scoping literature review, undertaken in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guideline, examined studies focusing on the lived experiences of dying at home in the UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The online databases CINAHL and MEDLINE were searched with relevant Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and keywords to identify primary qualitative research published between 2010 and 2022, exploring the lived experiences of patients, families, and/or unpaid carers in the UK.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 442 articles were screened, 61 of which underwent full-text review; 13 studies were retained in the final set. All studies explored the experience of bereaved family and/or unpaid carers, and one study interviewed a person who was dying. Where specified, the majority of experiences related to deaths from cancer, many with specialist palliative care team involvement. Included studies yielded a breadth of diverse findings, with the most common subject themes relating to the availability and quality of care, and support for families and carers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is limited published evidence exploring the lived experiences of end-of-life care at home and this constrains the extent to which community services can be evidence informed in their design and delivery. More research is needed to examine the first-hand experiences of people who are dying at home, particularly for those with non-cancer conditions and where specialist services are not involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Home is the preferred place of care and death for most people with advanced illness.

Aim: To examine and describe the published qualitative literature on the lived experiences of dying at home, to characterise the participants and their contexts, and to identify key gaps in knowledge, with a view to informing future research.

Design and setting: A scoping literature review, undertaken in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guideline, examined studies focusing on the lived experiences of dying at home in the UK.

Method: The online databases CINAHL and MEDLINE were searched with relevant Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and keywords to identify primary qualitative research published between 2010 and 2022, exploring the lived experiences of patients, families, and/or unpaid carers in the UK.

Results: In total, 442 articles were screened, 61 of which underwent full-text review; 13 studies were retained in the final set. All studies explored the experience of bereaved family and/or unpaid carers, and one study interviewed a person who was dying. Where specified, the majority of experiences related to deaths from cancer, many with specialist palliative care team involvement. Included studies yielded a breadth of diverse findings, with the most common subject themes relating to the availability and quality of care, and support for families and carers.

Conclusion: There is limited published evidence exploring the lived experiences of end-of-life care at home and this constrains the extent to which community services can be evidence informed in their design and delivery. More research is needed to examine the first-hand experiences of people who are dying at home, particularly for those with non-cancer conditions and where specialist services are not involved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国居家临终关怀的生活体验:定性研究范围综述。
背景 对于大多数晚期病人来说,家是他们首选的护理和死亡地点。目的 研究并描述已发表的有关在家死亡的生活经历的定性文献,描述参与者及其背景,并找出主要差距,以便为今后的研究提供参考。设计与背景 根据 PRISMA-ScR 指南进行范围界定文献综述。方法 使用相关的 MeSH 术语和关键词对在线数据库 CINAHL 和 MEDLINE 进行检索,以确定 2010 年至 2022 年间发表的、探讨英国患者、家属和/或无偿照护者生活经历的主要定性研究。结果 共筛选出 462 篇论文,对其中 58 篇进行了全文审阅,最终保留了 13 篇研究。所有研究都探讨了丧亲家庭和/或无偿照护者的经历,只有一项研究采访了临终者。在有明确说明的情况下,大多数研究都与癌症死亡有关,其中许多都有专业姑息关怀团队的参与。收录的论文得出了广泛多样的研究结果,其中最常见的主题与护理的可用性和质量以及对家属和照护者的支持有关。结论 目前,探讨居家临终关怀生活经验的公开发表的证据还很有限,这限制了社区服务在设计和提供过程中以证据为依据的程度。需要开展更多的研究来探讨在家临终者的亲身经历,尤其是那些非癌症患者和没有专科服务的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Supporting patients to use online services in general practice: focused ethnographic case study. Future Health Today: A pragmatic cluster randomised trial of quality improvement activities in general practice for patients at risk of undiagnosed cancer. Lived experiences of end-of-life care at home in the UK: a scoping review of qualitative research. What helps or hinders the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis. Relationship between research activity and the performance of English general practices: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1