Anaemia, ethnicity, and cancer incidence: a retrospective cohort study in primary care.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-09-25 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0762
Liz Down, Melissa Barlow, Sarah Er Bailey, Luke Ta Mounce, Samuel Wd Merriel, Jessica Watson, Ge Chen, Tanimola Martins
{"title":"Anaemia, ethnicity, and cancer incidence: a retrospective cohort study in primary care.","authors":"Liz Down, Melissa Barlow, Sarah Er Bailey, Luke Ta Mounce, Samuel Wd Merriel, Jessica Watson, Ge Chen, Tanimola Martins","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Haemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and rates of iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA) are used in primary care to investigate possible cancer symptoms, especially for gastrointestinal cancers. Underlying ethnic differences in typical test results could lead to inequalities in the diagnosis of cancer in primary care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the distribution of low haemoglobin, low MCV, and IDA, and the rate of cancer diagnosis in patients with abnormal results, by ethnic group.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using routine data collected in primary care in England was undertaken. Included patients had blood tests between 2010 and 2017, and were aged ≥40 years with no prior cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Multilevel logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between blood test results and cancer risk for patients in different ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low haemoglobin, low MCV, and IDA were effective in identifying patients with increased cancer risk, particularly for gastrointestinal cancers. MCV was found to be a stronger cancer indicator for White patients (diagnostic odds ratio [OR] 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.72 to 3.96) than for Asian (OR 1.86; 95% CI = 1.64 to 2.10) or Black patients (OR 1.75; 95% CI = 1.54 to 1.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are some small differences in cancer risk for patients with abnormal test results, when considering patient ethnic group, especially for MCV. This is likely to be a consequence of the underlying difference in typical MCV values for patients from different ethnic groups. Further investigation is required to understand the aetiology of these differences in order to disentangle any effects on outcomes for patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e678-e685"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12754673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Haemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and rates of iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA) are used in primary care to investigate possible cancer symptoms, especially for gastrointestinal cancers. Underlying ethnic differences in typical test results could lead to inequalities in the diagnosis of cancer in primary care.

Aim: To investigate the distribution of low haemoglobin, low MCV, and IDA, and the rate of cancer diagnosis in patients with abnormal results, by ethnic group.

Design and setting: A retrospective cohort study using routine data collected in primary care in England was undertaken. Included patients had blood tests between 2010 and 2017, and were aged ≥40 years with no prior cancer diagnosis.

Method: Multilevel logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between blood test results and cancer risk for patients in different ethnic groups.

Results: Low haemoglobin, low MCV, and IDA were effective in identifying patients with increased cancer risk, particularly for gastrointestinal cancers. MCV was found to be a stronger cancer indicator for White patients (diagnostic odds ratio [OR] 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.72 to 3.96) than for Asian (OR 1.86; 95% CI = 1.64 to 2.10) or Black patients (OR 1.75; 95% CI = 1.54 to 1.99).

Conclusion: There are some small differences in cancer risk for patients with abnormal test results, when considering patient ethnic group, especially for MCV. This is likely to be a consequence of the underlying difference in typical MCV values for patients from different ethnic groups. Further investigation is required to understand the aetiology of these differences in order to disentangle any effects on outcomes for patients with cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贫血、种族和癌症发病率:一项初级保健回顾性队列研究。
背景血红蛋白、平均体液容积(MCV)和缺铁性贫血(IDA)的发病率被用于初级保健,以调查可能的癌症症状,尤其是胃肠道癌症。典型检测结果的潜在种族差异可能会导致初级保健中癌症诊断的不平等。目的 调查不同种族群体中低血红蛋白、低 MCV 和 IDA 的分布情况,以及结果异常患者的癌症诊断率。设计和设置 利用英格兰初级医疗机构收集的常规数据进行回顾性队列研究。纳入的患者在 2010 年至 2017 年间进行过血液检测,年龄至少 40 岁,之前未确诊过癌症。方法 采用多级逻辑回归法研究不同种族群体患者血液检测结果与癌症风险之间的关系。结果 低血红蛋白、低 MCV 和 IDA 能有效识别癌症风险增加的患者,尤其是胃肠道癌症患者。与亚裔患者(OR 1.86)或黑人患者(OR 1.75)相比,MCV 对白人患者(诊断 OR 3.84)是一个更强的癌症指标。结论 如果考虑到患者的种族群体,检测结果异常的患者患癌症的风险存在一些微小差异,尤其是 MCV。这可能是不同种族患者的 MCV 典型值存在潜在差异的结果。需要进一步调查了解这些差异的病因,以厘清其对癌症患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Understanding measurement of postural hypotension: a nationwide survey of general practice in England. Evidence-based tests to monitor adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: rapid reviews and consensus process. Patients' perceptions on reasons for self-referring to the emergency department shortly before a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study. Anaemia, ethnicity, and cancer incidence: a retrospective cohort study in primary care. Patterns of diagnostic testing for oesophagogastric cancer-related symptoms in Australian primary care: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1