Effects of Cerclage Cabling on Preventing Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures When Using Cementless Stems for Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.085
{"title":"Effects of Cerclage Cabling on Preventing Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures When Using Cementless Stems for Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are serious complications in hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The rates of intraoperative (iPFFs) and postoperative PFFs (pPFFs) are higher in cementless stem cases than in cemented cases. This study aimed to investigate the effects of cerclage cabling on PFF prevention in cementless arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 329 consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroplasty using a cementless stem for femoral neck fractures. A total of 159 and 170 patients were in the non-cabling and cabling groups, respectively. Patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. The PFF occurrence (iPFF and pPFF) rates, reoperation rates, operative time, and blood loss volume were compared between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The iPFF rate was significantly higher in the noncabling group (6.3%) than in the cabling group (0%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The rate of pPFF was significantly higher in the non-cabling group (5.1%) than in the cabling group (0.6%; <em>P</em> = .016). All patients in the non-cabling group required reoperation (5.1%), whereas the patient in the cabling group was an ambulatory case and required no reoperation (0%, <em>P</em> = .003). No significant difference in either operative time or blood loss volume was observed between the non-cabling (50 minutes, 133 mL) and cabling (52 minutes, <em>P</em> = .244; 149 mL, <em>P</em> = .212, respectively) groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>When a cementless stem is used to treat unstable femoral neck fractures, cerclage cabling effectively prevents iPPF and pPPF without increasing surgical time or blood loss volume.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"39 11","pages":"Pages 2807-2811"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540324004406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are serious complications in hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The rates of intraoperative (iPFFs) and postoperative PFFs (pPFFs) are higher in cementless stem cases than in cemented cases. This study aimed to investigate the effects of cerclage cabling on PFF prevention in cementless arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.

Methods

This retrospective study included 329 consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroplasty using a cementless stem for femoral neck fractures. A total of 159 and 170 patients were in the non-cabling and cabling groups, respectively. Patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. The PFF occurrence (iPFF and pPFF) rates, reoperation rates, operative time, and blood loss volume were compared between the groups.

Results

The iPFF rate was significantly higher in the noncabling group (6.3%) than in the cabling group (0%, P < .001). The rate of pPFF was significantly higher in the non-cabling group (5.1%) than in the cabling group (0.6%; P = .016). All patients in the non-cabling group required reoperation (5.1%), whereas the patient in the cabling group was an ambulatory case and required no reoperation (0%, P = .003). No significant difference in either operative time or blood loss volume was observed between the non-cabling (50 minutes, 133 mL) and cabling (52 minutes, P = .244; 149 mL, P = .212, respectively) groups.

Conclusions

When a cementless stem is used to treat unstable femoral neck fractures, cerclage cabling effectively prevents iPPF and pPPF without increasing surgical time or blood loss volume.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用无骨水泥柄治疗不稳定股骨颈骨折时,Cerclage电缆对预防假体周围股骨骨折的影响
背景:股骨假体周围骨折(PFF)是股骨颈骨折髋关节置换术的严重并发症。与有骨水泥的病例相比,无骨水泥柄病例的术中和术后 PFF 发生率更高。本研究旨在探讨在股骨颈骨折无骨水泥关节置换术中使用cerclage布线对预防PFF的影响:这项回顾性研究连续纳入了329例因股骨颈骨折使用无骨水泥柄进行髋关节置换术的患者。无骨干组和有骨干组分别共有159名和170名患者。两组患者的特征相当。比较了两组的PFF发生率(术中PFF [iPFF] 和术后PFF [pPFF])、再手术率、手术时间和失血量:非布线组的 iPFF 率(6.3%)明显高于布线组(0%,P < 0.001)。非布线组的 pPFF 率(5.1%)明显高于布线组(0.6%;P = 0.016)。非布线组的所有患者都需要再次手术(5.1%),而布线组的患者是非卧床病例,无需再次手术(0%,P = 0.003)。非连接组(50分钟,133毫升)和连接组(52分钟,P = 0.244;149毫升,P = 0.212)的手术时间和失血量均无明显差异:结论:当使用无骨水泥柄治疗不稳定股骨颈骨折时,cerclage布线可有效防止iPPF和pPPF,而不会增加手术时间或失血量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
SRSF9 mediates oncogenic RNA splicing of SLC37A4 via liquid–liquid phase separation to promote oral cancer progression
IF 10.7 1区 综合性期刊Journal of Advanced ResearchPub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.03.013
Qiu Peng, Lujuan Wang, Ying Long, Hao Tian, Xuemeng Xu, Zongyao Ren, Yaqian Han, Xianjie Jiang, Zhu Wu, Shiming Tan, Wenjuan Yang, Linda Oyang, Xia Luo, Jinguan Lin, Longzheng Xia, Mingjing Peng, Nayiyuan Wu, Yanyan Tang, Qianjin Liao, Yujuan Zhou
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Volume Analysis of Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty in the United States. The CCJR® Charles A. Engh, Sr, MD. Excellence in Hip Research Award: Pelvic Tilt and Cup Position Change Significantly in Most Young Patients Ten Years After Hip Arthroplasty. Implant Selection and Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty with Discordant Surgical Approaches. Navigated and Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Do Not Confer Improved 5-Year Survivorship Compared to Conventional TKA: An Analysis from the American Joint Replacement Registry. Can a Large Language Model Interpret Data in the Electronic Health Record to Infer Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement Score Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1