Next generation sequencing improves the resolution of detecting mixed host blood meal sources in field collected arboviral mosquito vectors

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Medical and Veterinary Entomology Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/mve.12725
David P. Tchouassi, Robinson O. Kisero, Gilbert Rotich, Christopher Dunlap, Baldwyn Torto, Ephantus J. Muturi
{"title":"Next generation sequencing improves the resolution of detecting mixed host blood meal sources in field collected arboviral mosquito vectors","authors":"David P. Tchouassi,&nbsp;Robinson O. Kisero,&nbsp;Gilbert Rotich,&nbsp;Christopher Dunlap,&nbsp;Baldwyn Torto,&nbsp;Ephantus J. Muturi","doi":"10.1111/mve.12725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate knowledge of blood meal hosts of different mosquito species is critical for identifying potential vectors and establishing the risk of pathogen transmission. We compared the performance of Miseq next generation sequencing approach relative to conventional Sanger sequencing approach in identification of mosquito blood meals using genetic markers targeting the 12S rRNA and cytochrome oxidase I (COI) genes. We analysed the blood meals of three mosquito vector species (<i>Aedes aegypti</i>, <i>Aedes simpsoni</i> s.l. and <i>Culex pipiens</i> s.l.) collected outdoors, and compared the frequency of single- versus multiple-blood feeding. Single host blood meals were mostly recovered for Sanger-based sequencing of the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene, whereas Miseq sequencing employing this marker and the COI marker detected both single and multiple blood meal hosts in individual mosquitoes. Multiple blood meals (two or more hosts) which mostly included humans were detected in 19%–22.7% of <i>Ae. aegypti</i> samples. Most single host blood meals for this mosquito species were from humans (47.7%–57.1%) and dogs (9.1%–19.0%), with livestock, reptile and rodent hosts collectively accounting for 4.7%–28.9% of single host blood meals. The frequency of two or more host blood meals in <i>Ae. simpsoni</i> s.l. was 26.3%–45.5% mostly including humans, while single host blood meals were predominantly from humans (31.8%–47.4%) with representation of rodent, reptile and livestock blood meals (18.2%–68.2%). Single host blood meals from <i>Cx</i>. <i>pipiens</i> s.l. were mostly from humans (27.0%–39.4%) and cows (11.5%–27.36%). Multiple blood meal hosts that mostly included humans occurred in 21.2%–24.4% of <i>Cx. pipiens</i> s.l. samples. Estimated human blood indices ranged from 53%–76% for <i>Ae. aegypti</i>, 32%–82% for <i>Ae. simpsoni</i> s.l. and 26%–61% for <i>Cx. pipiens</i> s.l. and were consistently lower for Sanger-based sequencing approach compared to Miseq-based sequencing approach. These findings demonstrate that Miseq sequencing approach is superior to Sanger sequencing approach as it can reliably identify mixed host blood meals in a single mosquito, improving our ability to understand the transmission dynamics of mosquito-borne pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":18350,"journal":{"name":"Medical and Veterinary Entomology","volume":"38 4","pages":"407-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical and Veterinary Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mve.12725","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate knowledge of blood meal hosts of different mosquito species is critical for identifying potential vectors and establishing the risk of pathogen transmission. We compared the performance of Miseq next generation sequencing approach relative to conventional Sanger sequencing approach in identification of mosquito blood meals using genetic markers targeting the 12S rRNA and cytochrome oxidase I (COI) genes. We analysed the blood meals of three mosquito vector species (Aedes aegypti, Aedes simpsoni s.l. and Culex pipiens s.l.) collected outdoors, and compared the frequency of single- versus multiple-blood feeding. Single host blood meals were mostly recovered for Sanger-based sequencing of the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene, whereas Miseq sequencing employing this marker and the COI marker detected both single and multiple blood meal hosts in individual mosquitoes. Multiple blood meals (two or more hosts) which mostly included humans were detected in 19%–22.7% of Ae. aegypti samples. Most single host blood meals for this mosquito species were from humans (47.7%–57.1%) and dogs (9.1%–19.0%), with livestock, reptile and rodent hosts collectively accounting for 4.7%–28.9% of single host blood meals. The frequency of two or more host blood meals in Ae. simpsoni s.l. was 26.3%–45.5% mostly including humans, while single host blood meals were predominantly from humans (31.8%–47.4%) with representation of rodent, reptile and livestock blood meals (18.2%–68.2%). Single host blood meals from Cx. pipiens s.l. were mostly from humans (27.0%–39.4%) and cows (11.5%–27.36%). Multiple blood meal hosts that mostly included humans occurred in 21.2%–24.4% of Cx. pipiens s.l. samples. Estimated human blood indices ranged from 53%–76% for Ae. aegypti, 32%–82% for Ae. simpsoni s.l. and 26%–61% for Cx. pipiens s.l. and were consistently lower for Sanger-based sequencing approach compared to Miseq-based sequencing approach. These findings demonstrate that Miseq sequencing approach is superior to Sanger sequencing approach as it can reliably identify mixed host blood meals in a single mosquito, improving our ability to understand the transmission dynamics of mosquito-borne pathogens.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下一代测序技术提高了检测野外采集的虫媒病毒蚊媒中混合宿主血餐来源的分辨率。
准确了解不同种类蚊子的血餐宿主对于识别潜在病媒和确定病原体传播风险至关重要。我们利用针对 12S rRNA 和细胞色素氧化酶 I (COI) 基因的遗传标记,比较了 Miseq 下一代测序方法与传统 Sanger 测序方法在鉴定蚊子血餐方面的性能。我们分析了室外采集的三种蚊媒(埃及伊蚊、辛普森伊蚊和喙库蚊)的血餐,并比较了单宿主血餐和多宿主血餐的频率。在基于 Sanger 的线粒体 12S rRNA 基因测序中,大部分回收的都是单宿主血餐,而采用该标记和 COI 标记的 Miseq 测序则在蚊子个体中检测到了单宿主和多宿主血餐。在 19%-22.7% 的埃及姬蚊样本中检测到了多次血餐(两个或更多宿主),其中大部分包括人类。该蚊种的大多数单一宿主血餐来自人类(47.7%-57.1%)和狗(9.1%-19.0%),家畜、爬行动物和啮齿动物宿主合计占单一宿主血餐的 4.7%-28.9%。在 Ae. simpsoni s.l.中,两个或两个以上宿主血餐的频率为 26.3%-45.5%,主要包括人类,而单一宿主血餐主要来自人类(31.8%-47.4%),啮齿动物、爬行动物和家畜血餐的比例为 18.2%-68.2%。蝰蛇的单宿主血餐主要来自人类(27.0%-39.4%)和奶牛(11.5%-27.36%)。在 21.2%-24.4%的蝰蛇样本中,主要包括人类在内的多宿主血餐。埃及伊蚊的估计人血指数为 53%-76%,辛普森尼伊蚊的估计人血指数为 32%-82%,蝰蛇的估计人血指数为 26%-61%,与基于 Miseq 的测序方法相比,基于 Sanger 的测序方法的估计人血指数一直较低。这些发现表明,Miseq 测序方法优于 Sanger 测序方法,因为它能可靠地识别单只蚊子的混合宿主血餐,从而提高我们了解蚊媒病原体传播动态的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Medical and Veterinary Entomology 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical and Veterinary Entomology is the leading periodical in its field. The Journal covers the biology and control of insects, ticks, mites and other arthropods of medical and veterinary importance. The main strengths of the Journal lie in the fields of: -epidemiology and transmission of vector-borne pathogens changes in vector distribution that have impact on the pathogen transmission- arthropod behaviour and ecology- novel, field evaluated, approaches to biological and chemical control methods- host arthropod interactions. Please note that we do not consider submissions in forensic entomology.
期刊最新文献
Aedes aegypti control in breeding sites through an insecticidal coating with dual effect: Laboratory trials and safety assessment. A multiplex qPCR followed by high-resolution melting analysis for the detection of blood-feeding sources in Culex sp. mosquitoes. Issue Information Environmental determinants of West Nile virus vector abundance at the wildlife-livestock interface. Wild birds as hosts of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) and Anaplasmataceae (Rickettsiales) in the Atlantic rainforest ecoregion, Argentina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1