[Are the concepts of "chronic mania" in German-speaking psychiatry around 1900 early contributions to the disorder of the adult form of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)?]

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Nervenarzt Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1007/s00115-024-01669-7
Steffen Müller, Maria Strauß, Holger Steinberg
{"title":"[Are the concepts of \"chronic mania\" in German-speaking psychiatry around 1900 early contributions to the disorder of the adult form of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)?]","authors":"Steffen Müller, Maria Strauß, Holger Steinberg","doi":"10.1007/s00115-024-01669-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The adult form of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has increasingly become a focus of adult psychiatry. Despite long-established diagnostic criteria and specific therapeutic approaches for the disorder, the common misconception that ADHD is a \"fad\" has persisted. Examining the history of psychiatry can make an educational contribution by showing that the adult form of ADHD is a continuously existing illness phenomenon. The present study examines the discussion of sometimes prominent authors about \"chronic mania\" in German-speaking psychiatry around 1900. The individual concepts were analyzed for their content and compared with each other and with modern diagnostic manuals for adult ADHD. The aim of this work is to question and discuss whether these \"chronic-manic concepts\" are part of the conceptual history of adult ADHD and whether a gap in the history of this disorder can be filled with their help. It is concluded that in the early twentieth century neurologists reported and discussed about patients who nowadays would almost certainly receive the diagnosis of ADHD. The psychiatrists had difficulty in classifying this disorder into their nosological schemes but their \"chronic-manic concepts\" show clear parallels to the current diagnostic criteria for adult ADHD and its symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"81-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01669-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adult form of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has increasingly become a focus of adult psychiatry. Despite long-established diagnostic criteria and specific therapeutic approaches for the disorder, the common misconception that ADHD is a "fad" has persisted. Examining the history of psychiatry can make an educational contribution by showing that the adult form of ADHD is a continuously existing illness phenomenon. The present study examines the discussion of sometimes prominent authors about "chronic mania" in German-speaking psychiatry around 1900. The individual concepts were analyzed for their content and compared with each other and with modern diagnostic manuals for adult ADHD. The aim of this work is to question and discuss whether these "chronic-manic concepts" are part of the conceptual history of adult ADHD and whether a gap in the history of this disorder can be filled with their help. It is concluded that in the early twentieth century neurologists reported and discussed about patients who nowadays would almost certainly receive the diagnosis of ADHD. The psychiatrists had difficulty in classifying this disorder into their nosological schemes but their "chronic-manic concepts" show clear parallels to the current diagnostic criteria for adult ADHD and its symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[1900年左右德语精神病学中的 "慢性躁狂症 "概念是否是对成人型注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的早期贡献?]
成人注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)日益成为成人精神病学的焦点。尽管该疾病的诊断标准和具体治疗方法早已确立,但认为ADHD是一种 "时尚 "的普遍误解却一直存在。研究精神病学的历史可以说明成人型多动症是一种持续存在的疾病现象,从而在教育方面做出贡献。本研究考察了 1900 年前后德语精神病学中一些著名作家关于 "慢性躁狂症 "的讨论。对各个概念的内容进行了分析,并将其相互比较,同时与现代成人多动症诊断手册进行比较。这项工作的目的是质疑和讨论这些 "慢性躁狂症概念 "是否是成人多动症概念史的一部分,以及是否可以借助这些概念填补该疾病史上的空白。本文的结论是,在二十世纪初,神经科医生曾报告和讨论过一些病人,这些病人如今几乎肯定会被诊断为多动症。精神病学家很难将这种疾病归入他们的疾病分类体系,但他们的 "慢性躁狂症概念 "与当前的成人多动症诊断标准及其症状有着明显的相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
[Interplay between depression and sexuality]. [Nationwide evaluation of medical training in psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany]. [Brain sagging dementia-A rare potentially reversible cause of dementia]. [Compatibility of care work and specialist training in psychiatry : Position paper of the generation PSY-Next generation initiative of the German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy]. [Mechanisms of action of antidepressive pharmacotherapy: brain and mind-body and environment].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1