[Utilization of mental health services in Germany during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic-Systematic review and meta-analysis].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Nervenarzt Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s00115-025-01812-y
Antranik Erdekian, Miriam Glock, Sophia Huetter, Mike Rueb, Dirk Riedinger, Jutta Stoffers-Winterling, Saskia Lindner, Fabian Baum, Lars P Hölzel, Oliver Tüscher, Klaus Lieb, Kristina Adorjan, Hauke Felix Wiegand
{"title":"[Utilization of mental health services in Germany during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic-Systematic review and meta-analysis].","authors":"Antranik Erdekian, Miriam Glock, Sophia Huetter, Mike Rueb, Dirk Riedinger, Jutta Stoffers-Winterling, Saskia Lindner, Fabian Baum, Lars P Hölzel, Oliver Tüscher, Klaus Lieb, Kristina Adorjan, Hauke Felix Wiegand","doi":"10.1007/s00115-025-01812-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic studies showed indications of changes in the utilization of inpatient, outpatient and emergency mental healthcare services; however, the level of observation and representativeness of these studies were heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Changes in the utilization of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic care in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic were classified through a systematic literature search, evaluation of the quality and observational levels as well as a meta-analysis of the effects.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, PsycInfo and Embase until June 2023 and a follow-up search in PubMed up to and including October 2024. Data were assigned to the periods first lockdown phase, between lockdown phases, second lockdown phase and entire pandemic year 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies were included. There were reductions in the number of inpatient admissions for the first lockdown phase of relative risk, RR 0.74, 95% confidence interval CI 0.70-0.79, I<sup>2</sup> 95.5%, t<sup>2</sup> 0.0053 and for the second lockdown phase of RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.81, I<sup>2</sup> 97.1%, t<sup>2</sup> 0.0058. Only studies with a low observational level were found for psychiatric emergency care and only two studies with different indicators for outpatient utilization. There were no clear changes in the prescription of psychotropic drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic utilization of mental healthcare services was reduced, especially for the inpatient sector. The effects of these significant restrictions are unclear. We therefore propose a mental healthcare surveillance that could promptly record such changes and possible consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-025-01812-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic studies showed indications of changes in the utilization of inpatient, outpatient and emergency mental healthcare services; however, the level of observation and representativeness of these studies were heterogeneous.

Objectives: Changes in the utilization of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic care in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic were classified through a systematic literature search, evaluation of the quality and observational levels as well as a meta-analysis of the effects.

Material and methods: A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, PsycInfo and Embase until June 2023 and a follow-up search in PubMed up to and including October 2024. Data were assigned to the periods first lockdown phase, between lockdown phases, second lockdown phase and entire pandemic year 2020.

Results: A total of 17 studies were included. There were reductions in the number of inpatient admissions for the first lockdown phase of relative risk, RR 0.74, 95% confidence interval CI 0.70-0.79, I2 95.5%, t2 0.0053 and for the second lockdown phase of RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.81, I2 97.1%, t2 0.0058. Only studies with a low observational level were found for psychiatric emergency care and only two studies with different indicators for outpatient utilization. There were no clear changes in the prescription of psychotropic drugs.

Conclusion: In the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic utilization of mental healthcare services was reduced, especially for the inpatient sector. The effects of these significant restrictions are unclear. We therefore propose a mental healthcare surveillance that could promptly record such changes and possible consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
[Utilization of mental health services in Germany during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic-Systematic review and meta-analysis]. [Development of outpatient psychotherapeutic care in Saxony]. [Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a new pharmacological treatment option for psychiatric illnesses?] [Access to electroconvulsive therapy for people lacking decision making capacity and as nonvoluntary treatment : Expert consensus and statement of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN)]. [Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment in old age - It is never too late for ADHD].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1