Features in extractive supervised single-document summarization: case of Persian news

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Language Resources and Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s10579-024-09739-7
Hosein Rezaei, Seyed Amid Moeinzadeh Mirhosseini, Azar Shahgholian, Mohamad Saraee
{"title":"Features in extractive supervised single-document summarization: case of Persian news","authors":"Hosein Rezaei, Seyed Amid Moeinzadeh Mirhosseini, Azar Shahgholian, Mohamad Saraee","doi":"10.1007/s10579-024-09739-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Text summarization has been one of the most challenging areas of research in NLP. Much effort has been made to overcome this challenge by using either abstractive or extractive methods. Extractive methods are preferable due to their simplicity compared with the more elaborate abstractive methods. In extractive supervised single-document approaches, the system will not generate sentences. Instead, via supervised learning, it learns how to score sentences within the document based on some textual features and subsequently selects those with the highest rank. Therefore, the core objective is ranking, which enormously depends on the document structure and context. These dependencies have been unnoticed by many state-of-the-art solutions. In this work, document-related features such as topic and relative length are integrated into the vectors of every sentence to enhance the quality of summaries. Our experiment results show that the system takes contextual and structural patterns into account, which will increase the precision of the learned model. Consequently, our method will produce more comprehensive and concise summaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49927,"journal":{"name":"Language Resources and Evaluation","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Resources and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-024-09739-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Text summarization has been one of the most challenging areas of research in NLP. Much effort has been made to overcome this challenge by using either abstractive or extractive methods. Extractive methods are preferable due to their simplicity compared with the more elaborate abstractive methods. In extractive supervised single-document approaches, the system will not generate sentences. Instead, via supervised learning, it learns how to score sentences within the document based on some textual features and subsequently selects those with the highest rank. Therefore, the core objective is ranking, which enormously depends on the document structure and context. These dependencies have been unnoticed by many state-of-the-art solutions. In this work, document-related features such as topic and relative length are integrated into the vectors of every sentence to enhance the quality of summaries. Our experiment results show that the system takes contextual and structural patterns into account, which will increase the precision of the learned model. Consequently, our method will produce more comprehensive and concise summaries.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提取式有监督单篇文档摘要中的特征:波斯新闻案例
文本摘要一直是 NLP 中最具挑战性的研究领域之一。为了克服这一挑战,人们使用抽象或提取方法做出了很多努力。与更复杂的抽象方法相比,提取方法因其简单性而更受欢迎。在抽取式单文档监督方法中,系统不会生成句子。相反,通过监督学习,系统会学习如何根据某些文本特征对文档中的句子进行评分,然后选出排名最高的句子。因此,核心目标是排名,而排名在很大程度上取决于文档结构和上下文。许多最先进的解决方案都没有注意到这些依赖性。在这项工作中,与文档相关的特征(如主题和相对长度)被整合到每个句子的向量中,以提高摘要的质量。我们的实验结果表明,该系统考虑了上下文和结构模式,这将提高所学模型的精确度。因此,我们的方法将产生更全面、更简洁的摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Resources and Evaluation
Language Resources and Evaluation 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Language Resources and Evaluation is the first publication devoted to the acquisition, creation, annotation, and use of language resources, together with methods for evaluation of resources, technologies, and applications. Language resources include language data and descriptions in machine readable form used to assist and augment language processing applications, such as written or spoken corpora and lexica, multimodal resources, grammars, terminology or domain specific databases and dictionaries, ontologies, multimedia databases, etc., as well as basic software tools for their acquisition, preparation, annotation, management, customization, and use. Evaluation of language resources concerns assessing the state-of-the-art for a given technology, comparing different approaches to a given problem, assessing the availability of resources and technologies for a given application, benchmarking, and assessing system usability and user satisfaction.
期刊最新文献
Sentiment analysis dataset in Moroccan dialect: bridging the gap between Arabic and Latin scripted dialect Studying word meaning evolution through incremental semantic shift detection PARSEME-AR: Arabic reference corpus for multiword expressions using PARSEME annotation guidelines Normalized dataset for Sanskrit word segmentation and morphological parsing Conversion of the Spanish WordNet databases into a Prolog-readable format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1