Universal Sexual Violence Intervention Effects in a Cluster-Randomized Trial: Moderation by Sexual Orientation.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Interpersonal Violence Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1177/08862605241253031
Robert W S Coulter, Rachel E Gartner, Casey Cramer, Emil K Smith, Kaleab Z Abebe, Elizabeth Miller
{"title":"Universal Sexual Violence Intervention Effects in a Cluster-Randomized Trial: Moderation by Sexual Orientation.","authors":"Robert W S Coulter, Rachel E Gartner, Casey Cramer, Emil K Smith, Kaleab Z Abebe, Elizabeth Miller","doi":"10.1177/08862605241253031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual minority (e.g., gay/lesbian, bisexual, and queer) students are more likely than their heterosexual peers to experience sexual violence (SV) during college. Interventions that prevent SV and improve SV care-seeking behaviors for sexual minority students are lacking. <i>Giving Information for Trauma Support and Safety (GIFTSS)</i> is an evidence-based universal SV intervention implemented by providers during college health and counseling visits. Compared to controls, <i>GIFTSS</i> participants reported greater self-efficacy to use SV harm reduction strategies and SV disclosure during clinical visits. However, <i>GIFTSS'</i> effectiveness for sexual minority participants is unknown. The current study examines whether sexual orientation moderates <i>GIFTSS'</i> effects on numerous SV-related outcomes (i.e., to test whether intervention effects at 4 and 12 months differed based on sexual orientation). Across 28 college campuses in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, 2,291 students participated in a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial. We used mixed models with two- and three-way interaction terms to test whether sexual orientation modified <i>GIFTSS'</i> effects at 4- and 12-month follow-up on participants': SV recognition; knowledge of and self-efficacy to enact SV harm reduction strategies; intentions to intervene; knowledge of and self-efficacy to use SV-related services; SV disclosure during visits; and recent SV exposure. Overall, 22.1% of participants were sexual minorities (<i>n</i> = 507). Sexual orientation moderated <i>GIFTSS</i> effectiveness as indicated by significant three-way interaction (<i>p</i> = .01) at 12-month follow-up, and knowledge of SV services decreased for heterosexual participants (β = -.23) but increased for sexual minority participants (β = .23). Our study indicates that universal provider-based education may promote greater knowledge of SV services among sexual minority than heterosexual participants, and population-specific interventions are needed that reduce sexual minority students' SV exposure, service utilization, and other critical aspects of SV prevention on university campuses.<b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> Registry name: College Health Center-based Alcohol and Sexual Violence Intervention (GIFTSS), Registration number: NCT02355470, Web link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02355470, Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"582-606"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241253031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual minority (e.g., gay/lesbian, bisexual, and queer) students are more likely than their heterosexual peers to experience sexual violence (SV) during college. Interventions that prevent SV and improve SV care-seeking behaviors for sexual minority students are lacking. Giving Information for Trauma Support and Safety (GIFTSS) is an evidence-based universal SV intervention implemented by providers during college health and counseling visits. Compared to controls, GIFTSS participants reported greater self-efficacy to use SV harm reduction strategies and SV disclosure during clinical visits. However, GIFTSS' effectiveness for sexual minority participants is unknown. The current study examines whether sexual orientation moderates GIFTSS' effects on numerous SV-related outcomes (i.e., to test whether intervention effects at 4 and 12 months differed based on sexual orientation). Across 28 college campuses in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, 2,291 students participated in a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial. We used mixed models with two- and three-way interaction terms to test whether sexual orientation modified GIFTSS' effects at 4- and 12-month follow-up on participants': SV recognition; knowledge of and self-efficacy to enact SV harm reduction strategies; intentions to intervene; knowledge of and self-efficacy to use SV-related services; SV disclosure during visits; and recent SV exposure. Overall, 22.1% of participants were sexual minorities (n = 507). Sexual orientation moderated GIFTSS effectiveness as indicated by significant three-way interaction (p = .01) at 12-month follow-up, and knowledge of SV services decreased for heterosexual participants (β = -.23) but increased for sexual minority participants (β = .23). Our study indicates that universal provider-based education may promote greater knowledge of SV services among sexual minority than heterosexual participants, and population-specific interventions are needed that reduce sexual minority students' SV exposure, service utilization, and other critical aspects of SV prevention on university campuses.Clinical Trial Registration: Registry name: College Health Center-based Alcohol and Sexual Violence Intervention (GIFTSS), Registration number: NCT02355470, Web link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02355470, Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分组随机试验中的普遍性暴力干预效果:性取向的调节作用
与异性恋同学相比,性少数群体(如男同性恋/女同性恋、双性恋和同性恋者)学生更有可能在大学期间遭受性暴力(SV)。目前还缺乏针对性少数群体学生的预防性暴力和改善性暴力事件求助行为的干预措施。提供创伤支持和安全信息(GIFTSS)是一项基于证据的普遍性 SV 干预措施,由提供者在大学健康和咨询访问期间实施。与对照组相比,GIFTSS 的参与者在临床就诊过程中使用 SV 伤害减轻策略和 SV 披露的自我效能更高。然而,GIFTSS 对性少数群体参与者的效果尚不清楚。本研究探讨了性取向是否会调节 GIFTSS 对 SV 相关结果的影响(即检验 4 个月和 12 个月的干预效果是否会因性取向而有所不同)。在宾夕法尼亚州和西弗吉尼亚州的 28 所大学校园中,有 2291 名学生参加了一项双臂分组随机对照试验。我们使用了带有两向和三向交互项的混合模型,以检验性取向是否会改变 GIFTSS 在 4 个月和 12 个月的随访中对参与者的影响:对 SV 的认识;对实施 SV 减害策略的了解和自我效能;干预意向;对使用 SV 相关服务的了解和自我效能;就诊期间对 SV 的披露;以及最近对 SV 的接触。总体而言,22.1%的参与者为性少数群体(n = 507)。性取向调节了 GIFTSS 的有效性,在 12 个月的随访中,三方交互作用显著(p = .01),异性恋参与者对 SV 服务的了解有所减少(β = -.23),但性少数群体参与者对 SV 服务的了解有所增加(β = .23)。我们的研究表明,与异性恋参与者相比,以提供者为基础的普及教育可能会促进性少数群体参与者对 SV 服务有更多的了解,因此需要采取针对特定人群的干预措施,以减少性少数群体学生的 SV 暴露、服务利用率以及大学校园 SV 预防的其他重要方面:注册名称:基于大学生健康中心的酒精和性暴力干预(GIFTSS),注册号:NCT02355470,注册时间:2011 年 12 月:NCT02355470,网站链接:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02355470,不提供已识别的参与者个人数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
期刊最新文献
How to Evaluate Reports of Intimate Partner Violence? Examining Interpartner Agreement in a Forensic Sample of Different-Sex Couples Where Men are Accused of Intimate Partner Violence. Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment Styles as Factors Associated with Coping Stress Styles Among Iranian Women. Investigating the Impact of Reproductive Coercion and Intimate Partner Violence on Psychological and Sexual Wellbeing. Universal Sexual Violence Intervention Effects in a Cluster-Randomized Trial: Moderation by Sexual Orientation. Institutional Betrayal in the Criminal and Civil Legal Systems: Exploratory Factor Analysis with a Sample of Black and Hispanic Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1