The differential effect of oral and written corrective feedback on learners’ explicit versus implicit knowledge

Maria-Lourdes Lira-Gonzales, Hossein Nassaji, Martha L. De Tejeda, Dora Vasquez, Kiara Saenz
{"title":"The differential effect of oral and written corrective feedback on learners’ explicit versus implicit knowledge","authors":"Maria-Lourdes Lira-Gonzales, Hossein Nassaji, Martha L. De Tejeda, Dora Vasquez, Kiara Saenz","doi":"10.1177/13621688241248440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to address a gap in our understanding of how corrective feedback (CF) influences second language (L2) learning by examining the specific impacts of oral and written CF on acquiring the third person singular -s in the simple present tense. The study examines these effects on both explicit and implicit knowledge. The research was conducted in five intermediate adult English as a second language classrooms in Peru ( N = 101), using a pretest–posttest design with one control group ( n = 24) and four experimental groups: oral recast ( n = 21) oral metalinguistic CF ( n = 18) written direct CF ( n = 16) and written metalinguistic CF ( n = 22). The results revealed no significant difference between oral and written CF; however, differences were observed based on measurement types and CF subtypes used. This study’s findings carry theoretical and pedagogical implications, contributing valuable insights to both second language writing research and pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":508028,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241248440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study seeks to address a gap in our understanding of how corrective feedback (CF) influences second language (L2) learning by examining the specific impacts of oral and written CF on acquiring the third person singular -s in the simple present tense. The study examines these effects on both explicit and implicit knowledge. The research was conducted in five intermediate adult English as a second language classrooms in Peru ( N = 101), using a pretest–posttest design with one control group ( n = 24) and four experimental groups: oral recast ( n = 21) oral metalinguistic CF ( n = 18) written direct CF ( n = 16) and written metalinguistic CF ( n = 22). The results revealed no significant difference between oral and written CF; however, differences were observed based on measurement types and CF subtypes used. This study’s findings carry theoretical and pedagogical implications, contributing valuable insights to both second language writing research and pedagogy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口头和书面纠正反馈对学习者显性和隐性知识的不同影响
本研究试图通过考察口头和书面纠正反馈(CF)对掌握简单现在时第三人称单数 -s 的具体影响,弥补我们在了解纠正反馈(CF)如何影响第二语言(L2)学习方面的不足。本研究探讨了这些对显性和隐性知识的影响。研究在秘鲁的五个中级成人英语作为第二语言的课堂上进行(人数 = 101),采用前测-后测设计,分为一个对照组(人数 = 24)和四个实验组:口头重述组(人数 = 21)、口头金属语言 CF 组(人数 = 18)、书面直接 CF 组(人数 = 16)和书面金属语言 CF 组(人数 = 22)。结果显示,口头和书面 CF 之间没有明显差异;但是,根据所使用的测量类型和 CF 子类型,观察到了差异。本研究的结果具有理论和教学意义,为第二语言写作研究和教学提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Instructional task modality and teacher effects on L2 vocabulary learning: Evidence from adolescent learners Public primary school teachers’ perceptions and assessment of young learners’ engagement Student-teachers’ professional agency development through ADDIE model of CALL teacher preparation Getting puzzled about puzzling: Doing my first exploratory practice on self-directed English language learning The differential effect of oral and written corrective feedback on learners’ explicit versus implicit knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1