Instructional task modality and teacher effects on L2 vocabulary learning: Evidence from adolescent learners

Hye Won Shin
{"title":"Instructional task modality and teacher effects on L2 vocabulary learning: Evidence from adolescent learners","authors":"Hye Won Shin","doi":"10.1177/13621688241253617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated which type of instructional modality is most conducive to vocabulary learning. A total of 6 classrooms ( N = 121), all from one 6th grade cohort, were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) vocabulary training anchored in listening, (2) vocabulary training anchored in reading, or (3) vocabulary training anchored in writing. Three parallel versions of the tasks involved 21 target words embedded in contexts, but the students encountered these words explicitly through either listening or reading or writing modality. The study found, first, that there were statistically significant differences in favor of the reading and writing groups in terms of word association ability and vocabulary knowledge. Students in the reading and writing groups showed roughly the same level of vocabulary knowledge. Second, the study found that the results varied depending on the experience level of the teacher, which has implications for understanding how to improve vocabulary learning.","PeriodicalId":508028,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241253617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated which type of instructional modality is most conducive to vocabulary learning. A total of 6 classrooms ( N = 121), all from one 6th grade cohort, were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) vocabulary training anchored in listening, (2) vocabulary training anchored in reading, or (3) vocabulary training anchored in writing. Three parallel versions of the tasks involved 21 target words embedded in contexts, but the students encountered these words explicitly through either listening or reading or writing modality. The study found, first, that there were statistically significant differences in favor of the reading and writing groups in terms of word association ability and vocabulary knowledge. Students in the reading and writing groups showed roughly the same level of vocabulary knowledge. Second, the study found that the results varied depending on the experience level of the teacher, which has implications for understanding how to improve vocabulary learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学任务模式和教师对 L2 词汇学习的影响:来自青少年学习者的证据
本研究调查了哪种教学模式最有利于词汇学习。6个班级(121人)的学生均来自六年级,他们被随机分配到三种教学模式中的一种:(1)以听力为基础的词汇训练;(2)以阅读为基础的词汇训练;或(3)以写作为基础的词汇训练。三个平行版本的任务涉及嵌入语境的 21 个目标单词,但学生通过听力、阅读或写作模式明确地接触到这些单词。研究发现,首先,在单词联想能力和词汇知识方面,阅读组和写作组存在显著的统计学差异。阅读组和写作组学生的词汇知识水平大致相同。其次,研究发现,教师的经验水平不同,结果也不同,这对了解如何提高词汇学习有一定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Instructional task modality and teacher effects on L2 vocabulary learning: Evidence from adolescent learners Public primary school teachers’ perceptions and assessment of young learners’ engagement Student-teachers’ professional agency development through ADDIE model of CALL teacher preparation Getting puzzled about puzzling: Doing my first exploratory practice on self-directed English language learning The differential effect of oral and written corrective feedback on learners’ explicit versus implicit knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1