Implementing an evidence‐based behavioral weight‐loss program in community mental health centers: A randomized pilot study

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1002/osp4.760
Kimberly A. Gudzune, G. Jerome, Stacy Goldsholl, A. Dalcin, Joseph Gennusa, Tyler Fink, Christina T. Yuan, Kristal L. Brown, Eva Minahan, Nae-Yuh Wang, Gail L. Daumit
{"title":"Implementing an evidence‐based behavioral weight‐loss program in community mental health centers: A randomized pilot study","authors":"Kimberly A. Gudzune, G. Jerome, Stacy Goldsholl, A. Dalcin, Joseph Gennusa, Tyler Fink, Christina T. Yuan, Kristal L. Brown, Eva Minahan, Nae-Yuh Wang, Gail L. Daumit","doi":"10.1002/osp4.760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Obesity is a leading cause of preventable death among individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). A prior randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of a lifestyle style intervention tailored to this population; however, such interventions need to be adapted and tested for real‐world settings. Aims This study evaluated implementation interventions to support community mental health program staff to deliver an evidence‐based lifestyle intervention to clients with obesity and SMI. Materials & Methods In this cluster‐randomized pilot trial, the standard arm combined multimodal training with organizational strategy meetings and the enhanced arm included all standard strategies plus performance coaching. Staff‐coaches delivered a 6‐month group‐based lifestyle intervention to clients with SMI. Primary outcomes were changes in staff knowledge, self‐efficacy, and fidelity scores for lifestyle intervention delivery. Linear mixed‐effects modeling was used to analyze outcomes, addressing within‐site clustering and within‐participant longitudinal correlation of outcomes. Results Three sites were in the standard arm (7 staff‐coaches); 5 sites in the enhanced arm (11 staff‐coaches). All sites delivered all 26 modules of the lifestyle intervention. Staff‐coaches highly rated the training strategy's acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness. Overall, mean knowledge score significantly increased pre‐post by 5.5 (95% CI: 3.9, 7.1) and self‐efficacy was unchanged; neither significantly differed between arms. Fidelity ratings remained stable over time and did not differ between arms. Clients with SMI achieved a mean 6‐month weight loss of 3.8 kg (95% CI: 1.6, 6.1). Conclusions Mental health staff delivering a lifestyle intervention was feasible using multicomponent implementation interventions, and preliminary results show weight reduction among clients with SMI. The addition of performance coaching did not significantly change outcomes. Future studies are needed to definitively determine the effect on client health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"44 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.760","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Obesity is a leading cause of preventable death among individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). A prior randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of a lifestyle style intervention tailored to this population; however, such interventions need to be adapted and tested for real‐world settings. Aims This study evaluated implementation interventions to support community mental health program staff to deliver an evidence‐based lifestyle intervention to clients with obesity and SMI. Materials & Methods In this cluster‐randomized pilot trial, the standard arm combined multimodal training with organizational strategy meetings and the enhanced arm included all standard strategies plus performance coaching. Staff‐coaches delivered a 6‐month group‐based lifestyle intervention to clients with SMI. Primary outcomes were changes in staff knowledge, self‐efficacy, and fidelity scores for lifestyle intervention delivery. Linear mixed‐effects modeling was used to analyze outcomes, addressing within‐site clustering and within‐participant longitudinal correlation of outcomes. Results Three sites were in the standard arm (7 staff‐coaches); 5 sites in the enhanced arm (11 staff‐coaches). All sites delivered all 26 modules of the lifestyle intervention. Staff‐coaches highly rated the training strategy's acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness. Overall, mean knowledge score significantly increased pre‐post by 5.5 (95% CI: 3.9, 7.1) and self‐efficacy was unchanged; neither significantly differed between arms. Fidelity ratings remained stable over time and did not differ between arms. Clients with SMI achieved a mean 6‐month weight loss of 3.8 kg (95% CI: 1.6, 6.1). Conclusions Mental health staff delivering a lifestyle intervention was feasible using multicomponent implementation interventions, and preliminary results show weight reduction among clients with SMI. The addition of performance coaching did not significantly change outcomes. Future studies are needed to definitively determine the effect on client health outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在社区心理健康中心实施循证行为减肥计划:随机试点研究
摘要 背景 肥胖是严重精神疾病患者(SMI)可预防死亡的主要原因。之前的一项随机对照试验证明了针对这一人群的生活方式干预措施的有效性;然而,此类干预措施需要在现实环境中进行调整和测试。研究目的 本研究对实施干预措施进行了评估,以支持社区心理健康项目工作人员向肥胖和 SMI 患者提供循证生活方式干预。材料与方法 在这项分组随机试点试验中,标准组将多模式培训与组织策略会议相结合,增强组则包括所有标准策略和绩效辅导。员工教练为 SMI 患者提供为期 6 个月的以小组为基础的生活方式干预。主要结果是员工在知识、自我效能以及生活方式干预实施的忠诚度方面的变化。采用线性混合效应模型对结果进行分析,解决了研究地点内的聚类和参与者内结果的纵向相关性问题。结果 标准组有 3 个地点(7 名工作人员-教练);强化组有 5 个地点(11 名工作人员-教练)。所有研究机构都实施了生活方式干预的全部 26 个模块。员工教练对培训策略的可接受性、可行性和适宜性给予了高度评价。总体而言,知识平均得分在干预前显著提高了 5.5 分(95% CI:3.9 分,7.1 分),而自我效能则保持不变;两组之间均无显著差异。随着时间的推移,忠实度评分保持稳定,不同治疗方案之间没有差异。SMI 患者 6 个月的平均体重减轻了 3.8 公斤(95% 置信区间:1.6, 6.1)。结论 心理健康人员采用多组分实施干预的方式进行生活方式干预是可行的,初步结果显示,SMI 患者的体重有所下降。增加绩效指导并没有显著改变结果。今后还需要进行研究,以明确确定对客户健康结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Proton-Coupled Electron and Energy Transfer in Molecular Triads. Chromenylium and Flavylium Polymethine Fluorophores Light Up the Shortwave Infrared Region Construction and Application of Nucleic Acids-Based Biomolecular Condensates Chemical Editing of Proteins: From a Specific Residue to Functional Domains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1