Impact of reclaimed wastewater on alfalfa production under different irrigation methods

N. Th. Mazahrih, Abeer Albalawneh, Nabeel Bani Hani, Roula Khadra, Ahmed Abo Dalo, Yousef Al-Omari, Badir Al-Omari, Mohammad Abu Hammad, Isabel Martin, Khalid Fahd, Alberto Carletti, Alessandra Paulotto, Nizar Haddad
{"title":"Impact of reclaimed wastewater on alfalfa production under different irrigation methods","authors":"N. Th. Mazahrih, Abeer Albalawneh, Nabeel Bani Hani, Roula Khadra, Ahmed Abo Dalo, Yousef Al-Omari, Badir Al-Omari, Mohammad Abu Hammad, Isabel Martin, Khalid Fahd, Alberto Carletti, Alessandra Paulotto, Nizar Haddad","doi":"10.2166/wpt.2024.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The effect of different irrigation methods (sprinkler, surface, surface-drip, and subsurface-drip) using treated wastewater, on alfalfa yield quantity and quality, was studied under semi-arid conditions. Randomized complete block design considering irrigation methods on 5 × 5 m plots replicated four times. Applied irrigation water was based on the Penman–Monteith equation using the FAO Cropwat software and accounting for the efficiencies of used irrigation systems. Surface irrigation gave the highest alfalfa fresh yield without significant difference compared to subsurface-drip. Average fresh production was 123, 120, 109, and 91 tons/h for surface, subsurface-drip, surface-drip, and sprinkler irrigation, respectively. Alfalfa fresh weight from subsurface-drip irrigation was 32 and 10% higher compared to sprinkler and surface-drip irrigation. Alfalfa dry weight from subsurface-drip irrigation was 10, 21, and 47% higher compared to surface-drip, surface, and sprinkler irrigation, respectively. N percentage in alfalfa leaves was significantly lower by 12% under subsurface-drip irrigation as compared to the other irrigation methods. Escherichia coli (E. coli) and fecal coliform (FC) were not detected on alfalfa leaves using subsurface-drip irrigation. E. coli and FC counts were high on leaves using sprinkler and surface irrigation. Subsurface-drip irrigation may be adapted as an efficient irrigation method when using non-conventional water under semi-arid conditions.","PeriodicalId":104096,"journal":{"name":"Water Practice & Technology","volume":"68 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Practice & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of different irrigation methods (sprinkler, surface, surface-drip, and subsurface-drip) using treated wastewater, on alfalfa yield quantity and quality, was studied under semi-arid conditions. Randomized complete block design considering irrigation methods on 5 × 5 m plots replicated four times. Applied irrigation water was based on the Penman–Monteith equation using the FAO Cropwat software and accounting for the efficiencies of used irrigation systems. Surface irrigation gave the highest alfalfa fresh yield without significant difference compared to subsurface-drip. Average fresh production was 123, 120, 109, and 91 tons/h for surface, subsurface-drip, surface-drip, and sprinkler irrigation, respectively. Alfalfa fresh weight from subsurface-drip irrigation was 32 and 10% higher compared to sprinkler and surface-drip irrigation. Alfalfa dry weight from subsurface-drip irrigation was 10, 21, and 47% higher compared to surface-drip, surface, and sprinkler irrigation, respectively. N percentage in alfalfa leaves was significantly lower by 12% under subsurface-drip irrigation as compared to the other irrigation methods. Escherichia coli (E. coli) and fecal coliform (FC) were not detected on alfalfa leaves using subsurface-drip irrigation. E. coli and FC counts were high on leaves using sprinkler and surface irrigation. Subsurface-drip irrigation may be adapted as an efficient irrigation method when using non-conventional water under semi-arid conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同灌溉方法下再生废水对紫花苜蓿产量的影响
在半干旱条件下,研究了使用经处理的废水的不同灌溉方法(喷灌、地表灌溉、地表滴灌和地下滴灌)对紫花苜蓿产量和质量的影响。考虑到灌溉方法,采用随机完全区组设计,5 × 5 m 小块,重复四次。灌溉用水量根据彭曼-蒙蒂斯方程计算,使用了粮农组织的 Cropwat 软件,并考虑了所用灌溉系统的效率。地表灌溉的紫花苜蓿鲜产量最高,与地下滴灌相比无显著差异。地表、地下滴灌、地面滴灌和喷灌的平均鲜重产量分别为 123 吨/小时、120 吨/小时、109 吨/小时和 91 吨/小时。与喷灌和地面滴灌相比,地下滴灌的紫花苜蓿鲜重分别高出 32% 和 10%。地表下滴灌的紫花苜蓿干重分别比地面滴灌、地面灌溉和喷灌高 10%、21% 和 47%。与其他灌溉方法相比,地下滴灌的紫花苜蓿叶片中氮含量显著降低了 12%。采用地下滴灌时,苜蓿叶片上未检测到大肠杆菌和粪大肠菌群。喷灌和地表灌溉的叶片上大肠杆菌和 FC 含量较高。在半干旱条件下使用非传统水源时,地表下滴灌可作为一种高效灌溉方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing water efficiency programming in the City of Calgary Ingress of municipal solid waste into water resources: an environmental assessment and monitoring tool near dumpsites in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria Development of δ-Bi2O3/Bi2SiO5 heterostructures based on biogenic silica for photocatalytic treatment from organic pollutants Integrated assessment of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in semi-arid region in Bolivia Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange and methyl violet dyes by UV/Cu2+/PDS process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1