Integrated assessment of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in semi-arid region in Bolivia

Ivette Echeverría, R. Escalera, Oliver Saavedra, Gabriel Aliaga, Renato Montoya
{"title":"Integrated assessment of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in semi-arid region in Bolivia","authors":"Ivette Echeverría, R. Escalera, Oliver Saavedra, Gabriel Aliaga, Renato Montoya","doi":"10.2166/wpt.2024.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This study comprehensively evaluates four decentralized wastewater treatment plants intended for agricultural reuse in a semi-arid low-moderate temperature region. It considers environmental, technical, economic, and social perspectives. Anaerobic baffled reactors with hybrid gravel filters (ABR + HGF + VGF) proved the most efficient, with moderate requirements in space, O&M, and energy, albeit the highest treatment cost. Up-flow sludge blanket reactor with activated sludge (UASB + AS) demonstrated high efficiency and compactness, with moderate treatment costs. However, it incurred high energy demands, complex O&M, and more sludge generation. UASB with horizontal gravel filter (UASB + HGF) was among the most land-intensive systems, with moderate costs and O&M requirements, and low energy consumption. However, it fell short of meeting certain environmental criteria. ABR with stabilization ponds (ABR + PONDS) emerged as the most economical, with low energy consumption, but was also among the most land-intensive and failed to achieve adequate effluent quality. Socially, all WWTPs were well accepted for agricultural reuse benefits. In terms of odor perception, UASB + AS and ABR + HGF + VGF exhibit the lowest impact. The Most Appropriate Treatment Technology Index (MATTI) ranked ABR + HGF + VGF and UASB + AS as adequate technologies, while UASB + HGF and ABR + PONDS were poorly adequate. The study recommends a four-dimensional assessment for selecting the most suitable technology, considering the specific context.","PeriodicalId":104096,"journal":{"name":"Water Practice & Technology","volume":"2 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Practice & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study comprehensively evaluates four decentralized wastewater treatment plants intended for agricultural reuse in a semi-arid low-moderate temperature region. It considers environmental, technical, economic, and social perspectives. Anaerobic baffled reactors with hybrid gravel filters (ABR + HGF + VGF) proved the most efficient, with moderate requirements in space, O&M, and energy, albeit the highest treatment cost. Up-flow sludge blanket reactor with activated sludge (UASB + AS) demonstrated high efficiency and compactness, with moderate treatment costs. However, it incurred high energy demands, complex O&M, and more sludge generation. UASB with horizontal gravel filter (UASB + HGF) was among the most land-intensive systems, with moderate costs and O&M requirements, and low energy consumption. However, it fell short of meeting certain environmental criteria. ABR with stabilization ponds (ABR + PONDS) emerged as the most economical, with low energy consumption, but was also among the most land-intensive and failed to achieve adequate effluent quality. Socially, all WWTPs were well accepted for agricultural reuse benefits. In terms of odor perception, UASB + AS and ABR + HGF + VGF exhibit the lowest impact. The Most Appropriate Treatment Technology Index (MATTI) ranked ABR + HGF + VGF and UASB + AS as adequate technologies, while UASB + HGF and ABR + PONDS were poorly adequate. The study recommends a four-dimensional assessment for selecting the most suitable technology, considering the specific context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻利维亚半干旱地区分散式污水处理厂的综合评估
本研究全面评估了半干旱低温-中温地区用于农业再利用的四座分散式污水处理厂。研究从环境、技术、经济和社会角度进行了考虑。事实证明,带混合砾石过滤器(ABR + HGF + VGF)的厌氧障板反应器效率最高,对空间、运行维护和能源的要求适中,但处理成本最高。带活性污泥的上流式污泥毯反应器(UASB + AS)效率高,结构紧凑,处理成本适中。不过,它的能耗要求高,运行和维护复杂,产生的污泥量也更多。UASB + 水平砾石过滤器(UASB + HGF)是土地密集度最高的系统之一,成本和运行维护要求适中,能耗较低。但是,它没有达到某些环境标准。带稳定塘的 ABR(ABR + PONDS)是最经济的系统,能耗低,但也是土地密集度最高的系统之一,而且无法达到适当的出水质量。在社会方面,所有污水处理厂的农业回用效益都得到了广泛认可。就臭味感知而言,UASB + AS 和 ABR + HGF + VGF 的影响最小。最合适处理技术指数 (MATTI) 将 ABR + HGF + VGF 和 UASB + AS 评为最合适的技术,而 UASB + HGF 和 ABR + PONDS 的最合适程度较低。研究建议进行四维评估,根据具体情况选择最合适的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing water efficiency programming in the City of Calgary Ingress of municipal solid waste into water resources: an environmental assessment and monitoring tool near dumpsites in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria Development of δ-Bi2O3/Bi2SiO5 heterostructures based on biogenic silica for photocatalytic treatment from organic pollutants Integrated assessment of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in semi-arid region in Bolivia Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange and methyl violet dyes by UV/Cu2+/PDS process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1