Effectiveness of luliconazole vs ketoconazole topical formulation in reversing damaged hair cuticle

M. Khalse, Kamlesh Patel, Varsha Pawar
{"title":"Effectiveness of luliconazole vs ketoconazole topical formulation in reversing damaged hair cuticle","authors":"M. Khalse, Kamlesh Patel, Varsha Pawar","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpp.2024.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Azole antifungal agents are effective agents for treating scalp ailments such as seborrheic dermatitis. Luliconazole (LZ) is a new azole with unique effects against clinically important dermatomycotic fungi. This study examines the impact of different topical formulation of Luliconazole vs Ketoconazole (KZ) on damaged hair cuticle repair after 5 and 10 washes, using SEM images and sensory Analysis.In this in-vitro study,twelve damaged hair tresses were divided into two groups, and treated with LZ and KZ formulations. Both groups underwent pretreatment with 20% Sodium Laureth sulfate (SLES) and damage induction using 9% HO and 20% ammonium solution, followed by respective LZ (Lupizol ZS, manufactured by Lupin Ltd, India) and KZ therapies. SEM imaging and expert sensory analysis were conducted at baseline, after 5, and 10 washes to evaluate surface characterization like cuticle upliftment, smoothness, and softness.After five washes, LZ-treated hair exhibited smooth, intact cuticles with no upliftment, improving to grade 1 cuticle damage. In contrast, KZ-treated hair continued to show substantial upliftment without damage grade improvement. After ten washes, LZ maintained grade 1 damage and 0 µm upliftment, while KZ-treated strands persisted in showing considerable cuticular distress. Sensory analysis supported these results, with LZ improving hair smoothness and softness by 2.42x and 2.72x respectively, after ten washes, significantly outperforming KZ. Visually, LZ-treated hair appeared smoother and healthier, indicating its greater effectiveness in enhancing hair integrity post-washing.The botanical conditioner-based formulation of LZ is more efficacious in enhancing hair integrity post-washing compared to the Ketoconazole formulation. Well-controlled human studies are required to further establish the clinical effects on human participants.","PeriodicalId":13313,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpp.2024.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Azole antifungal agents are effective agents for treating scalp ailments such as seborrheic dermatitis. Luliconazole (LZ) is a new azole with unique effects against clinically important dermatomycotic fungi. This study examines the impact of different topical formulation of Luliconazole vs Ketoconazole (KZ) on damaged hair cuticle repair after 5 and 10 washes, using SEM images and sensory Analysis.In this in-vitro study,twelve damaged hair tresses were divided into two groups, and treated with LZ and KZ formulations. Both groups underwent pretreatment with 20% Sodium Laureth sulfate (SLES) and damage induction using 9% HO and 20% ammonium solution, followed by respective LZ (Lupizol ZS, manufactured by Lupin Ltd, India) and KZ therapies. SEM imaging and expert sensory analysis were conducted at baseline, after 5, and 10 washes to evaluate surface characterization like cuticle upliftment, smoothness, and softness.After five washes, LZ-treated hair exhibited smooth, intact cuticles with no upliftment, improving to grade 1 cuticle damage. In contrast, KZ-treated hair continued to show substantial upliftment without damage grade improvement. After ten washes, LZ maintained grade 1 damage and 0 µm upliftment, while KZ-treated strands persisted in showing considerable cuticular distress. Sensory analysis supported these results, with LZ improving hair smoothness and softness by 2.42x and 2.72x respectively, after ten washes, significantly outperforming KZ. Visually, LZ-treated hair appeared smoother and healthier, indicating its greater effectiveness in enhancing hair integrity post-washing.The botanical conditioner-based formulation of LZ is more efficacious in enhancing hair integrity post-washing compared to the Ketoconazole formulation. Well-controlled human studies are required to further establish the clinical effects on human participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氟环唑与酮康唑外用制剂在逆转受损头发角质层方面的效果对比
唑类抗真菌剂是治疗头皮疾病(如脂溢性皮炎)的有效药物。卢利康唑(Luliconazole,LZ)是一种新型唑类药物,对临床上重要的皮霉菌有独特疗效。在这项体外研究中,12 根受损发丝被分为两组,分别使用 LZ 和 KZ 制剂进行治疗。两组均使用 20% 的月桂醇聚醚硫酸钠(SLES)进行预处理,并使用 9% 的 HO 和 20% 的铵溶液进行损伤诱导,然后分别使用 LZ(Lupizol ZS,由印度 Lupin 有限公司生产)和 KZ 治疗。在基线、5 次和 10 次水洗后,分别进行了扫描电子显微镜成像和专家感官分析,以评估头发的表面特征,如角质层隆起、光滑度和柔软度。与此相反,KZ 处理过的头发继续表现出明显的提升,但损伤等级没有改善。经过十次水洗后,LZ 保持了 1 级损伤和 0 µm 的上浮,而 KZ 处理过的发丝则继续表现出相当严重的角质层损伤。感官分析证实了这些结果,经过十次洗涤后,LZ 可将头发的顺滑度和柔软度分别提高 2.42 倍和 2.72 倍,明显优于 KZ。与酮康唑配方相比,LZ 植物护发素配方在提高洗发后头发的完整性方面更有效。要进一步确定对人体参与者的临床效果,还需要进行对照良好的人体研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A small review on recent advances in transdermal drug delivery system Effectiveness of luliconazole vs ketoconazole topical formulation in reversing damaged hair cuticle Assessing prescribing practices in a rural hospital: A cross-sectional study using WHO prescribing indicators A study on appropriate use and stewardship of proton pump inhibitors Papillary thyroid cancer and its gene polymorphism; A molecular mechanistic perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1