Unveiling the truth: greenwashing in sustainable finance

Juan Dempere, Ebrahim Alamash, Paulo Mattos
{"title":"Unveiling the truth: greenwashing in sustainable finance","authors":"Juan Dempere, Ebrahim Alamash, Paulo Mattos","doi":"10.3389/frsus.2024.1362051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Greenwashing in sustainable finance involves misleading portrayals of investment products as environmentally friendly. This study explores the prevalence of greenwashing, its forms, impacts, and potential remedies. It underscores the need to align investor values with genuine environmental sustainability, emphasizing the pitfalls of greenwashing in sustainable finance.The study employs a scoping review methodology guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. It involves systematically searching, selecting, and synthesizing evidence from various databases and sources to map critical concepts, types of evidence, and research gaps in greenwashing within sustainable finance.The study reveals diverse greenwashing strategies across industries, including ambiguous language, irrelevant claims, and opacity. It highlights greenwashing’s severe consequences on corporate reputation, financial performance, and stakeholder trust. The effectiveness of regulatory bodies, Non-Governmental Organizations, and certifications in curbing greenwashing is discussed, though their effectiveness is debatable. The research also examines greenwashing’s impact on investor behavior and decision-making.This research contributes to understanding greenwashing in sustainable finance, emphasizing vigilance, transparency, and accountability. It calls for more stringent regulations, international cooperation, and public awareness to combat greenwashing effectively. The study also suggests that businesses should adopt genuine and transparent environmental practices to avoid the risks of greenwashing, including legal repercussions. For future research, the study proposes a deeper exploration of the mechanisms enabling greenwashing and the effectiveness of different regulatory strategies and measures to combat it.","PeriodicalId":253319,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainability","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1362051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Greenwashing in sustainable finance involves misleading portrayals of investment products as environmentally friendly. This study explores the prevalence of greenwashing, its forms, impacts, and potential remedies. It underscores the need to align investor values with genuine environmental sustainability, emphasizing the pitfalls of greenwashing in sustainable finance.The study employs a scoping review methodology guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. It involves systematically searching, selecting, and synthesizing evidence from various databases and sources to map critical concepts, types of evidence, and research gaps in greenwashing within sustainable finance.The study reveals diverse greenwashing strategies across industries, including ambiguous language, irrelevant claims, and opacity. It highlights greenwashing’s severe consequences on corporate reputation, financial performance, and stakeholder trust. The effectiveness of regulatory bodies, Non-Governmental Organizations, and certifications in curbing greenwashing is discussed, though their effectiveness is debatable. The research also examines greenwashing’s impact on investor behavior and decision-making.This research contributes to understanding greenwashing in sustainable finance, emphasizing vigilance, transparency, and accountability. It calls for more stringent regulations, international cooperation, and public awareness to combat greenwashing effectively. The study also suggests that businesses should adopt genuine and transparent environmental practices to avoid the risks of greenwashing, including legal repercussions. For future research, the study proposes a deeper exploration of the mechanisms enabling greenwashing and the effectiveness of different regulatory strategies and measures to combat it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开真相:可持续金融中的绿色清洗
可持续金融中的 "洗绿 "是指将投资产品误导性地描述为环保产品。本研究探讨了 "洗绿 "的普遍性、其形式、影响和潜在的补救措施。本研究采用了以 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目)框架为指导的范围综述方法。该研究采用了以 PRISMA(系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)框架为指导的范围界定综述方法,包括从各种数据库和来源中系统地搜索、选择和综合证据,以绘制可持续金融领域绿色清洗的关键概念、证据类型和研究缺口。研究强调了 "洗绿 "对企业声誉、财务业绩和利益相关者信任度造成的严重后果。研究还讨论了监管机构、非政府组织和认证在遏制 "洗绿 "方面的有效性,尽管这些机构和组织的有效性还有待商榷。研究还探讨了 "洗绿 "对投资者行为和决策的影响。这项研究有助于理解可持续金融中的 "洗绿 "行为,强调警惕性、透明度和问责制。研究呼吁制定更严格的法规、开展国际合作和提高公众意识,以有效打击 "洗绿 "行为。研究还建议,企业应采取真实、透明的环保做法,以避免 "洗绿 "的风险,包括法律后果。对于今后的研究,研究建议深入探讨导致 "绿色清洗 "的机制,以及不同监管策略和措施在打击 "绿色清洗 "方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Campus sustainability at Rhodes University, South Africa: perceptions, awareness level, and potential interventions PET and polyolefin plastics supply chains in Michigan: present and future systems analysis of environmental and socio-economic impacts COP28 and the global stocktake: a weak attempt to address climate change Strengthening resilience: decentralized decision-making and multi-criteria analysis in the energy-water-food nexus systems Tomato disease detection with lightweight recurrent and convolutional deep learning models for sustainable and smart agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1