Validation of the Teacher Questionnaire of Montessori Practice for Early Childhood in the Dutch Context

Jaap de Brouwer, Vivian Morssink-Santing, Symen van der Zee
{"title":"Validation of the Teacher Questionnaire of Montessori Practice for Early Childhood in the Dutch Context","authors":"Jaap de Brouwer, Vivian Morssink-Santing, Symen van der Zee","doi":"10.17161/jomr.v10i1.21543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Montessori education has existed for more than 100 years and counts almost 16,000 schools worldwide (Debs et al., 2022). Still, little is known about the implementation and fidelity of Montessori principles. Measuring implementations holds significant importance as it provides insight into current Montessori practices and because it is assumed that implementation might influence its effectiveness. In the Netherlands, it is especially important to measure fidelity because of the country’s history of flexible implementation of Montessori principles. No instruments currently exist that are specifically designed to measure Montessori implementation in the Dutch context. This study aims to validate a translated version of the Teacher Questionnaire for Montessori Practices, developed by Murray et al. (2019), within the Dutch early childhood education context. Additionally, it seeks to investigate the extent to which Montessori principles are implemented in Dutch early childhood schools. Data were collected from 131 early childhood Montessori teachers. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the Dutch dataset did not align with the factor structure proposed by Murray et al. (2019). Subsequent exploratory factor analysis led to the identification of a 3-factor solution, encompassing dimensions related to Children’s Freedom, Teacher Guidance, and Curriculum, which shows some similarities with Murray et al.’s (2019) factors. Implementation levels in the Netherlands varied, with the highest level of implementation observed in Children’s Freedom and the lowest in Curriculum.","PeriodicalId":416731,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Montessori Research","volume":"64 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Montessori Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v10i1.21543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Montessori education has existed for more than 100 years and counts almost 16,000 schools worldwide (Debs et al., 2022). Still, little is known about the implementation and fidelity of Montessori principles. Measuring implementations holds significant importance as it provides insight into current Montessori practices and because it is assumed that implementation might influence its effectiveness. In the Netherlands, it is especially important to measure fidelity because of the country’s history of flexible implementation of Montessori principles. No instruments currently exist that are specifically designed to measure Montessori implementation in the Dutch context. This study aims to validate a translated version of the Teacher Questionnaire for Montessori Practices, developed by Murray et al. (2019), within the Dutch early childhood education context. Additionally, it seeks to investigate the extent to which Montessori principles are implemented in Dutch early childhood schools. Data were collected from 131 early childhood Montessori teachers. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the Dutch dataset did not align with the factor structure proposed by Murray et al. (2019). Subsequent exploratory factor analysis led to the identification of a 3-factor solution, encompassing dimensions related to Children’s Freedom, Teacher Guidance, and Curriculum, which shows some similarities with Murray et al.’s (2019) factors. Implementation levels in the Netherlands varied, with the highest level of implementation observed in Children’s Freedom and the lowest in Curriculum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰蒙特梭利幼儿教育实践教师问卷的验证
蒙特梭利教育已有 100 多年的历史,在全世界有近 16 000 所学校(Debs et al.)然而,人们对蒙特梭利原则的实施和忠实性知之甚少。对蒙台梭利原则的实施情况进行衡量具有重要意义,因为它可以让人们深入了解蒙台梭利的现行做法,而且人们认为实施情况可能会影响其有效性。在荷兰,由于蒙特梭利原则在该国有着灵活实施的历史,因此对其忠实性进行衡量尤为重要。目前还没有专门用于测量荷兰蒙特梭利实施情况的工具。本研究旨在验证由 Murray 等人(2019 年)开发的蒙台梭利实践教师问卷的翻译版本在荷兰幼儿教育环境中的有效性。此外,本研究还试图调查蒙特梭利原则在荷兰幼儿学校的实施程度。本研究收集了 131 名蒙台梭利幼儿教师的数据。确认性因子分析显示,荷兰的数据集与 Murray 等人(2019 年)提出的因子结构不一致。随后进行的探索性因子分析确定了 3 个因子的解决方案,包括与儿童自由、教师指导和课程相关的维度,这与 Murray 等人(2019 年)的因子有一些相似之处。荷兰的实施水平参差不齐,儿童自由的实施水平最高,课程的实施水平最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maria Montessori and the Mystery of Language Acquisition Mortarboard Review Educational Pacifism and Montessori Validation of the Teacher Questionnaire of Montessori Practice for Early Childhood in the Dutch Context From the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1