Critical risk management strategies for the operation of public–private partnerships: a vulnerability perspective of infrastructure projects

Weiling Jiang, Jie Jiang, Igor Martek, Wen Jiang
{"title":"Critical risk management strategies for the operation of public–private partnerships: a vulnerability perspective of infrastructure projects","authors":"Weiling Jiang, Jie Jiang, Igor Martek, Wen Jiang","doi":"10.1108/ecam-12-2023-1292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe success of public–private partnership (PPP) projects is highly correlated to the successful management of risks encountered during the operation phase. PPP projects are especially exposed to risk due to the long operation period over which revenues need to be generated to recoup substantial initial investment and operational running costs. Despite the critical impact of risk exposure, limited research has been specifically undertaken on the matter of operational risk management. This study seeks to address this oversight by identifying and evaluating operational risk management strategies for PPPs.Design/methodology/approachVulnerability theory is the theoretical lens used, with context drawn from Chinese PPP projects. Based on the data collected from expert interviews and questionnaires, 28 operational risk management strategies are identified. A fuzzy synthetic method is employed to analyze the effectiveness of the 28 strategies.FindingsThe findings reveal that providing an exit mechanism clause into the contract, establishing a comprehensive performance evaluation mechanism and developing a clear compensation mechanism are the top three effective strategies. This study also reveals that risk mitigation approaches that reduce vulnerability prove more effective than attempts to reduce external threats. Specifically, strategies aimed at managing contract, political, technical and financial risk are the most effective.Originality/valueThe findings of this study extend current knowledge regarding the risk management of PPP projects. They also offer a reference by which practitioners may select effective operational risk management pathways and thereby, galvanize the sustainable development of PPPs.","PeriodicalId":504601,"journal":{"name":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-12-2023-1292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe success of public–private partnership (PPP) projects is highly correlated to the successful management of risks encountered during the operation phase. PPP projects are especially exposed to risk due to the long operation period over which revenues need to be generated to recoup substantial initial investment and operational running costs. Despite the critical impact of risk exposure, limited research has been specifically undertaken on the matter of operational risk management. This study seeks to address this oversight by identifying and evaluating operational risk management strategies for PPPs.Design/methodology/approachVulnerability theory is the theoretical lens used, with context drawn from Chinese PPP projects. Based on the data collected from expert interviews and questionnaires, 28 operational risk management strategies are identified. A fuzzy synthetic method is employed to analyze the effectiveness of the 28 strategies.FindingsThe findings reveal that providing an exit mechanism clause into the contract, establishing a comprehensive performance evaluation mechanism and developing a clear compensation mechanism are the top three effective strategies. This study also reveals that risk mitigation approaches that reduce vulnerability prove more effective than attempts to reduce external threats. Specifically, strategies aimed at managing contract, political, technical and financial risk are the most effective.Originality/valueThe findings of this study extend current knowledge regarding the risk management of PPP projects. They also offer a reference by which practitioners may select effective operational risk management pathways and thereby, galvanize the sustainable development of PPPs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公私伙伴关系运营的关键风险管理战略:基础设施项目的脆弱性视角
目的 公私伙伴关系(PPP)项目的成功与否与能否成功管理运营阶段遇到的风险密切相关。公私合作伙伴关系项目的风险尤其大,因为项目运营期较长,需要在此期间创造收入,以收回大量的初始投资和运营成本。尽管风险暴露的影响至关重要,但专门针对运营风险管理问题的研究却十分有限。本研究试图通过识别和评估 PPP 项目的运营风险管理策略来解决这一疏忽问题。根据专家访谈和问卷调查收集的数据,确定了 28 种操作风险管理策略。研究结果研究结果表明,在合同中加入退出机制条款、建立全面的绩效评估机制和制定明确的补偿机制是最有效的三大策略。本研究还显示,减少脆弱性的风险缓解方法比减少外部威胁的尝试更有效。具体而言,旨在管理合同、政治、技术和财务风险的策略最为有效。研究结果还为从业人员选择有效的运营风险管理途径提供了参考,从而促进公私伙伴关系的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hybrid MCDM approach for analyzing barriers and formulating strategies for the adoption of modular construction in developing countries Synchronizing BIM cost models and bills of quantities for lifecycle audit trail cost management Sustainable development goals under threat: the impact of inflation on construction projects Public perceived efficacy of emergency infrastructure project: antecedents in a triadic reciprocal determinism Integrated measurement of public safety risks in international construction projects in the belt and road initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1