Integrated measurement of public safety risks in international construction projects in the belt and road initiative

Pengcheng Xiang, Simai Yang, Yongqi Yuan, Ranyang Li
{"title":"Integrated measurement of public safety risks in international construction projects in the belt and road initiative","authors":"Pengcheng Xiang, Simai Yang, Yongqi Yuan, Ranyang Li","doi":"10.1108/ecam-11-2023-1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the public safety risks of international construction projects (ICPs) from the perspective of threat and vulnerability. A novel and comprehensive risk assessment approach is developed from a systemic perspective and applied to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to improve the public safety risk management strategy for ICPs in BRI.Design/methodology/approachFirst, a public safety risk indicator system was constructed from the two dimensions, namely threat and vulnerability. Next, an integrated measurement model was constructed by combining the Genetic Algorithm-Backpropagation (GA-BP) neural network, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and matter-element extension (MME) method. Data from 49 countries involved in the BRI, as well as five typical projects, were used to validate the model. Finally, targeted risk prevention measures were identified for use at the national, enterprise and project levels.FindingsThe findings indicate that while the vulnerability risks of typical projects in each region of the BRI were generally low, threat risks were high in West Asia and North Africa, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries and South Asia.Originality/valueFirst, the structure of the public safety risk system of ICPs was analyzed using vulnerability and system theories. The connotation of public safety risk was defined based on two dimensions, namely threat and vulnerability. The idea of measuring threat risk with public data and measuring vulnerability risk with project data was clarified, and the risk measurement was integrated into the measurement results to help researchers and managers understand and systematically consider the public safety risks of ICPs. Second, a public safety risk indicator system was constructed, including 18 threat risk indicators and 14 vulnerability risk indicators to address the gaps in the existing research. The MEE model was employed to overcome the problem of incompatible indicator systems and provide stable and credible integrated measurement results. Finally, the whole-process public safety risk management scheme designed in this study can help to both provide a reference point for the Chinese enterprises and oversea contractors in market selection as well as improve ICP public safety risk management.","PeriodicalId":504601,"journal":{"name":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-11-2023-1102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the public safety risks of international construction projects (ICPs) from the perspective of threat and vulnerability. A novel and comprehensive risk assessment approach is developed from a systemic perspective and applied to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to improve the public safety risk management strategy for ICPs in BRI.Design/methodology/approachFirst, a public safety risk indicator system was constructed from the two dimensions, namely threat and vulnerability. Next, an integrated measurement model was constructed by combining the Genetic Algorithm-Backpropagation (GA-BP) neural network, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and matter-element extension (MME) method. Data from 49 countries involved in the BRI, as well as five typical projects, were used to validate the model. Finally, targeted risk prevention measures were identified for use at the national, enterprise and project levels.FindingsThe findings indicate that while the vulnerability risks of typical projects in each region of the BRI were generally low, threat risks were high in West Asia and North Africa, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries and South Asia.Originality/valueFirst, the structure of the public safety risk system of ICPs was analyzed using vulnerability and system theories. The connotation of public safety risk was defined based on two dimensions, namely threat and vulnerability. The idea of measuring threat risk with public data and measuring vulnerability risk with project data was clarified, and the risk measurement was integrated into the measurement results to help researchers and managers understand and systematically consider the public safety risks of ICPs. Second, a public safety risk indicator system was constructed, including 18 threat risk indicators and 14 vulnerability risk indicators to address the gaps in the existing research. The MEE model was employed to overcome the problem of incompatible indicator systems and provide stable and credible integrated measurement results. Finally, the whole-process public safety risk management scheme designed in this study can help to both provide a reference point for the Chinese enterprises and oversea contractors in market selection as well as improve ICP public safety risk management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 "一带一路 "国际建设项目中的公共安全风险进行综合衡量
目的本文旨在从威胁和脆弱性的角度全面认识国际建设项目(ICP)的公共安全风险。首先,从威胁性和脆弱性两个维度构建了公共安全风险指标体系。然后,结合遗传算法-反向传播(GA-BP)神经网络、模糊综合评价法和物质元素扩展(MME)法,构建了综合测量模型。来自 49 个参与 BRI 的国家以及 5 个典型项目的数据被用来验证该模型。研究结果研究结果表明,"金砖四国 "各地区典型项目的脆弱性风险普遍较低,但西亚北非、独联体国家和南亚地区的威胁风险较高。根据威胁和脆弱性两个维度界定了公共安全风险的内涵。明确了以公共数据衡量威胁性风险和以项目数据衡量脆弱性风险的思路,并将风险衡量结果与衡量结果相结合,帮助研究人员和管理人员理解和系统考虑国际比较方案的公共安全风险。其次,针对现有研究的不足,构建了公共安全风险指标体系,包括 18 个威胁风险指标和 14 个脆弱性风险指标。采用 MEE 模型克服了指标体系不兼容的问题,提供了稳定可信的综合测量结果。最后,本研究设计的全过程公共安全风险管理方案既有助于为中国企业和海外承包商提供市场选择的参考,也有助于改进 ICP 公共安全风险管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hybrid MCDM approach for analyzing barriers and formulating strategies for the adoption of modular construction in developing countries Synchronizing BIM cost models and bills of quantities for lifecycle audit trail cost management Sustainable development goals under threat: the impact of inflation on construction projects Public perceived efficacy of emergency infrastructure project: antecedents in a triadic reciprocal determinism Integrated measurement of public safety risks in international construction projects in the belt and road initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1