-wave-based exploration of sensitive EEG features and classification of situation awareness

C. Feng, S. Liu, X. Wanyan, Y. Dang, Z. Wang, C. Qian
{"title":"-wave-based exploration of sensitive EEG features and classification of situation awareness","authors":"C. Feng, S. Liu, X. Wanyan, Y. Dang, Z. Wang, C. Qian","doi":"10.1017/aer.2024.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The purpose of this study was to explore the electroencephalogram (EEG) features sensitive to situation awareness (SA) and then classify SA levels. Forty-eight participants were recruited to complete an SA standard test based on the multi-attribute task battery (MATB) II, and the corresponding EEG data and situation awareness global assessment technology (SAGAT) scores were recorded. The population with the top 25% of SAGAT scores was selected as the high-SA level (HSL) group, and the bottom 25% was the low-SA level (LSL) group. The results showed that (1) for the relative power of \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 1 (16–20Hz), \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 2 (20–24Hz) and \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 3 (24–30Hz), repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) in three brain regions (Central Central-Parietal, and Parietal) × three brain lateralities (left, midline, and right) × two SA groups (HSL and LSL) showed a significant main effect for SA groups; post hoc comparisons revealed that compared with LSL, the above features of HSL were higher. (2) for most ratio features associated with \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 1 ∼ \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 3, ANOVA also revealed a main effect for SA groups. (3) EEG features sensitive to SA were selected to classify SA levels with small-sample data based on the general supervised machine learning classifiers. Five-fold cross-validation results showed that among the models with easy interpretability, logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) presented the highest accuracy (both 92%), while among the models with hard interpretability, the accuracy of random forest (RF) was 88.8%, followed by an artificial neural network (ANN) of 84%. The above results suggested that (1) the relative power of \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 1 ∼ \n \n \n \n$\\beta$\n\n \n 3 and their associated ratios were sensitive to changes in SA levels; (2) the general supervised machine learning models all exhibited good accuracy (greater than 75%); and (3) furthermore, LR and DT are recommended by combining the interpretability and accuracy of the models.","PeriodicalId":508971,"journal":{"name":"The Aeronautical Journal","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Aeronautical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2024.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the electroencephalogram (EEG) features sensitive to situation awareness (SA) and then classify SA levels. Forty-eight participants were recruited to complete an SA standard test based on the multi-attribute task battery (MATB) II, and the corresponding EEG data and situation awareness global assessment technology (SAGAT) scores were recorded. The population with the top 25% of SAGAT scores was selected as the high-SA level (HSL) group, and the bottom 25% was the low-SA level (LSL) group. The results showed that (1) for the relative power of $\beta$ 1 (16–20Hz), $\beta$ 2 (20–24Hz) and $\beta$ 3 (24–30Hz), repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) in three brain regions (Central Central-Parietal, and Parietal) × three brain lateralities (left, midline, and right) × two SA groups (HSL and LSL) showed a significant main effect for SA groups; post hoc comparisons revealed that compared with LSL, the above features of HSL were higher. (2) for most ratio features associated with $\beta$ 1 ∼ $\beta$ 3, ANOVA also revealed a main effect for SA groups. (3) EEG features sensitive to SA were selected to classify SA levels with small-sample data based on the general supervised machine learning classifiers. Five-fold cross-validation results showed that among the models with easy interpretability, logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) presented the highest accuracy (both 92%), while among the models with hard interpretability, the accuracy of random forest (RF) was 88.8%, followed by an artificial neural network (ANN) of 84%. The above results suggested that (1) the relative power of $\beta$ 1 ∼ $\beta$ 3 and their associated ratios were sensitive to changes in SA levels; (2) the general supervised machine learning models all exhibited good accuracy (greater than 75%); and (3) furthermore, LR and DT are recommended by combining the interpretability and accuracy of the models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
-基于波的敏感脑电图特征探索和情境意识分类
本研究旨在探索对情境意识(SA)敏感的脑电图(EEG)特征,然后对SA水平进行分类。研究人员招募了 48 名参与者,完成了基于多属性任务电池(MATB)II 的 SA 标准测试,并记录了相应的脑电图数据和情境意识全球评估技术(SAGAT)得分。SAGAT 分数排名前 25% 的人群被选为高 SA 水平(HSL)组,排名后 25% 的人群被选为低 SA 水平(LSL)组。结果表明:(1)对于$\beta$1(16-20Hz)、$\beta$2(20-24Hz)和$\beta$3(24-30Hz)的相对功率,在三个脑区(中央-顶叶和顶叶)×三个脑侧线(左侧、中线和右侧)×两个SA组(HSL和LSL)的重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)显示,SA组的主效应显著;事后比较显示,与LSL相比,HSL的上述特征更高。(2)对于与 1 ∼ 3 美元贝塔相关的大多数比率特征,方差分析也显示出 SA 组的主效应。(3) 基于一般监督机器学习分类器,选择对 SA 敏感的脑电特征,用小样本数据对 SA 水平进行分类。五倍交叉验证结果显示,在易解释性模型中,逻辑回归(LR)和决策树(DT)的准确率最高(均为 92%),而在难解释性模型中,随机森林(RF)的准确率为 88.8%,其次是人工神经网络(ANN),准确率为 84%。上述结果表明:(1)$\beta$ 1 ∼ $\beta$ 3 的相对功率及其相关比率对 SA 水平的变化很敏感;(2)一般监督机器学习模型都表现出良好的准确性(大于 75%);(3)此外,综合模型的可解释性和准确性,推荐使用 LR 和 DT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of actuation and sensor measurement delays on stability of real-time hybrid aeroelastic simulation system New design of materials, order and thicknesses of an aircraft windshield behaviour layers to increase its resistance against repeated bird impacts Simulation of particle-laden flows and erosion in an axial fan stage considering the relative position of the blades Performance analysis of power conditioning and distribution module for microsatellite applications Numerical investigation of thermochemical non-equilibrium effects in Mach 10 scramjet nozzle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1