Does checking-in help? Understanding L2 learners’ autonomous check-in behavior in an English-language MOOC through learning analytics

ReCALL Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1017/s0958344024000144
Yining Zhang, Fang Yang, Haolin Yang, Shuyuan Han
{"title":"Does checking-in help? Understanding L2 learners’ autonomous check-in behavior in an English-language MOOC through learning analytics","authors":"Yining Zhang, Fang Yang, Haolin Yang, Shuyuan Han","doi":"10.1017/s0958344024000144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Concerns over the quality of teaching in massive open online courses devoted to language learning (LMOOCs) have prompted extensive research on learning behavior in such courses. The purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of autonomous learning check-ins – that is, individuals sharing their own learning records and/or other information about their learning-related experience – a novel behavior that has not been studied in previous LMOOC research. Using learning analytics, we found that just 6.2% (n = 699) of a sample of 11,293 learners autonomously engaged in check-in behavior, and that the content of these learners’ check-ins varied considerably according to their contexts and the language skills they were seeking to acquire. We further found (1) a positive association between check-in behavior and LMOOC completion; (2) that students who chose to check in earned relatively low grades on unit quizzes, especially in their early stage of learning, but outperformed the non-check-in group significantly in final exam scores; and (3) that those who checked in engaged with a significantly wider array of in-LMOOC learning components than those who did not, and thus accessed a wider system of language-learning experiences. Taken together, these results confirm that check-in behavior can aid the process of learning in an LMOOC and further highlight this behavior’s wider potential to aid self-directed autonomous online learning.","PeriodicalId":503438,"journal":{"name":"ReCALL","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ReCALL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344024000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns over the quality of teaching in massive open online courses devoted to language learning (LMOOCs) have prompted extensive research on learning behavior in such courses. The purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of autonomous learning check-ins – that is, individuals sharing their own learning records and/or other information about their learning-related experience – a novel behavior that has not been studied in previous LMOOC research. Using learning analytics, we found that just 6.2% (n = 699) of a sample of 11,293 learners autonomously engaged in check-in behavior, and that the content of these learners’ check-ins varied considerably according to their contexts and the language skills they were seeking to acquire. We further found (1) a positive association between check-in behavior and LMOOC completion; (2) that students who chose to check in earned relatively low grades on unit quizzes, especially in their early stage of learning, but outperformed the non-check-in group significantly in final exam scores; and (3) that those who checked in engaged with a significantly wider array of in-LMOOC learning components than those who did not, and thus accessed a wider system of language-learning experiences. Taken together, these results confirm that check-in behavior can aid the process of learning in an LMOOC and further highlight this behavior’s wider potential to aid self-directed autonomous online learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
签到有用吗?通过学习分析了解英语 MOOC 中 L2 学习者的自主签到行为
对大规模开放式在线语言学习课程(LMOOC)教学质量的担忧促使人们对此类课程中的学习行为进行了广泛的研究。本研究的目的是更好地了解自主学习签到--即个人分享自己的学习记录和/或其他与学习相关的体验信息--这种新颖的行为在以往的 LMOOC 研究中从未被研究过。通过学习分析,我们发现在 11,293 个学习者样本中,仅有 6.2%(n = 699)的学习者自主参与了签到行为,而且这些学习者的签到内容因其所处的环境和所要掌握的语言技能而有很大不同。我们还发现:(1) 签到行为与 LMOOC 的完成之间存在正相关;(2) 选择签到的学生在单元测验中获得的成绩相对较低,尤其是在学习的早期阶段,但在期末考试成绩上明显优于未签到组;(3) 签到者参与的 LMOOC 学习内容明显多于未签到者,从而获得了更广泛的语言学习体验。总之,这些结果证实了签到行为可以帮助 LMOOC 的学习过程,并进一步凸显了这种行为在帮助自主在线学习方面的广泛潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of high-immersion virtual reality on EFL learners’ foreign language speaking anxiety: A mixed-method approach Conceptualising language MOOC diversity: The creation of a defined taxonomy through the analysis of course indicators Does checking-in help? Understanding L2 learners’ autonomous check-in behavior in an English-language MOOC through learning analytics The impact of data-driven learning form-focused tasks on learners’ task engagement: An intervention study Preparing teachers for the future: Microteaching in the immersive VR environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1