Navigating Professional Registration and Development Pathways: Perspectives of Healthcare Practitioners

A. Alshamsan, Ameera Alhasani, Alia Aleisa, Yousra Alatiq, Muhammad Althanian, Muhammad Waseem Shahzad, Adel A Al-Shabaan, Mustafa Bodrick, A. Alsukhayri, Rawan Almalki, Safa Alakhdhair, Yasir Sulaiman Abdurahman Almuways
{"title":"Navigating Professional Registration and Development Pathways: Perspectives of Healthcare Practitioners","authors":"A. Alshamsan, Ameera Alhasani, Alia Aleisa, Yousra Alatiq, Muhammad Althanian, Muhammad Waseem Shahzad, Adel A Al-Shabaan, Mustafa Bodrick, A. Alsukhayri, Rawan Almalki, Safa Alakhdhair, Yasir Sulaiman Abdurahman Almuways","doi":"10.32996/jmhs.2024.5.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) has undertaken a comprehensive evaluation of its registration and classification services to pinpoint areas for optimization. Recognizing healthcare professionals as essential stakeholders, SCFHS actively solicited their perspectives to better understand their needs and to collect actionable suggestions for service enhancement. Employing a multifaceted research approach, this study utilized focus groups, a large-scale survey involving over 700,000 healthcare practitioners, and comparative benchmarking against selected G-20 nations. The findings indicate a strong desire among practitioners for a reorganisation of the current registration and classification procedures. Notably, there was a consensus for extending the registration period, with a predominant preference for a five-year duration. Participants also advocated for various improvements, such as an increase in Continuing Medical Education (CME) hours, financial cost reductions, and streamlining of registration processes. While benchmarking revealed that SCFHS's existing registration durations are generally on par with other G-20 countries, it also highlighted potential opportunities for diversifying registration types to better meet the needs of healthcare professionals.","PeriodicalId":509795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Health Studies","volume":" 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Health Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jmhs.2024.5.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) has undertaken a comprehensive evaluation of its registration and classification services to pinpoint areas for optimization. Recognizing healthcare professionals as essential stakeholders, SCFHS actively solicited their perspectives to better understand their needs and to collect actionable suggestions for service enhancement. Employing a multifaceted research approach, this study utilized focus groups, a large-scale survey involving over 700,000 healthcare practitioners, and comparative benchmarking against selected G-20 nations. The findings indicate a strong desire among practitioners for a reorganisation of the current registration and classification procedures. Notably, there was a consensus for extending the registration period, with a predominant preference for a five-year duration. Participants also advocated for various improvements, such as an increase in Continuing Medical Education (CME) hours, financial cost reductions, and streamlining of registration processes. While benchmarking revealed that SCFHS's existing registration durations are generally on par with other G-20 countries, it also highlighted potential opportunities for diversifying registration types to better meet the needs of healthcare professionals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业注册和发展途径导航:医疗从业人员的观点
沙特卫生专业委员会(SCFHS)对其注册和分类服务进行了全面评估,以确定需要优化的领域。认识到医疗保健专业人员是重要的利益相关者,SCFHS 积极征求他们的意见,以更好地了解他们的需求,并收集可操作的服务改进建议。这项研究采用了多方面的研究方法,包括焦点小组、涉及 70 多万名医疗从业人员的大规模调查,以及与选定的 20 国集团国家的比较基准。研究结果表明,从业人员强烈希望对现行的注册和分类程序进行重组。值得注意的是,与会者一致同意延长注册期限,主要倾向于五年。与会者还主张采取各种改进措施,如增加继续医学教育(CME)时数、降低财务成本和简化注册程序。基准测试表明,南太平洋医疗卫生联合会现有的注册期限总体上与 20 国集团的其他国家持平,但也强调了注册类型多样化的潜在机会,以更好地满足医疗卫生专业人员的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Potential Drug Delivery Vehicle against Colorectal Cancer Various Clinical Manifestation of Omphalomesenteric Duct Remnant in a Child: A Case Report Navigating Professional Registration and Development Pathways: Perspectives of Healthcare Practitioners An Overview of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Antibiotic Use in Inpatients in Orthopedic Surgery at Dr. H. Moch. Ansari Saleh Banjarmasin Prevalence and Associated Factors of Restless Leg Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1