Unveiling Power Dynamics: Diversity Interpretations, Management Practices, and Inclusion Perceptions in the Workplace

Pamela Irazú Ramírez Ibarra, Adriana Martínez Martínez
{"title":"Unveiling Power Dynamics: Diversity Interpretations, Management Practices, and Inclusion Perceptions in the Workplace","authors":"Pamela Irazú Ramírez Ibarra, Adriana Martínez Martínez","doi":"10.21640/ns.v16i32.3466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current diversity management literature highlights a lack of empirical investigations into nuanced diversity characteristics within specific contexts, with a predominant focus on the USA, Europe, and Asia. This article addresses these gaps by exploring the intricate relationship between interpretations of workforce diversity dimensions and ensuing diversity management practices, shaping perceptions of inclusion or exclusion. Workplace diversity is viewed subjectively, influenced by contextual factors like industry and location. A case study was conducted in June 2022 within a Japanese automotive company, gathering qualitative data through techniques such as semi-structured in-depth interviews and non-participant observations were made during two guided visits. AtlasTi was utilized for the analysis of results. Findings reveal that socio-economic differences' interpretation is swayed by power imbalances in labor relationships. Diversity management practices aligned with the dominant group exacerbate inequality among demographic groups, establishing metaphorical «glass ceilings» for minorities and fostering exclusion perceptions. Considering the case study’s limitations, the research contributes to the diversity management discourse, prompting a reevaluation of practices to mitigate unintentional inequality perpetuation in the workplace.","PeriodicalId":19411,"journal":{"name":"Nova Scientia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nova Scientia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v16i32.3466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current diversity management literature highlights a lack of empirical investigations into nuanced diversity characteristics within specific contexts, with a predominant focus on the USA, Europe, and Asia. This article addresses these gaps by exploring the intricate relationship between interpretations of workforce diversity dimensions and ensuing diversity management practices, shaping perceptions of inclusion or exclusion. Workplace diversity is viewed subjectively, influenced by contextual factors like industry and location. A case study was conducted in June 2022 within a Japanese automotive company, gathering qualitative data through techniques such as semi-structured in-depth interviews and non-participant observations were made during two guided visits. AtlasTi was utilized for the analysis of results. Findings reveal that socio-economic differences' interpretation is swayed by power imbalances in labor relationships. Diversity management practices aligned with the dominant group exacerbate inequality among demographic groups, establishing metaphorical «glass ceilings» for minorities and fostering exclusion perceptions. Considering the case study’s limitations, the research contributes to the diversity management discourse, prompting a reevaluation of practices to mitigate unintentional inequality perpetuation in the workplace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开权力动态的面纱:工作场所的多样性解释、管理实践和包容观念
当前的多样性管理文献强调缺乏对特定背景下细微多样性特征的实证调查,主要集中在美国、欧洲和亚洲。本文通过探讨对劳动力多样性维度的解释与随之而来的多样性管理实践之间的复杂关系,以及对包容性或排斥性的看法,弥补了这些不足。对工作场所多样性的看法是主观的,受到行业和地点等背景因素的影响。2022 年 6 月,在一家日本汽车公司内开展了一项案例研究,通过半结构式深度访谈等技术收集定性数据,并在两次引导访问中进行了非参与观察。分析结果使用了 AtlasTi。研究结果显示,社会经济差异的解释受到劳动关系中权力不平衡的影响。与主流群体一致的多元化管理实践加剧了人口群体之间的不平等,为少数群体建立了隐喻性的 "玻璃天花板",并助长了排斥观念。考虑到案例研究的局限性,这项研究有助于多样性管理的讨论,促使人们重新评估各种做法,以减轻工作场所无意中造成的不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unveiling Power Dynamics: Diversity Interpretations, Management Practices, and Inclusion Perceptions in the Workplace La pertenencia y los linderos de las heredades en la configuración de los estados de la Mesa del Centro. Un análisis desde la georreferenciación de la cartografía histórica Exchange Rate and Stock Market in Mexico: A Correlation Analysis (1993-2022) Vulnerabilidad social y embarazo en estudiantes universitarias Antioxidant activity of kafirins and procyanidins of sorghum against the superoxide anion radical
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1