Factors influencing Italian consumers’ willingness to buy and pay for insect-fed poultry products

G. Tiboldo, N. Casolani, M. C. Reguzzi, F. Cominelli, S. Coderoni, L. Arata, E. Mazzoni
{"title":"Factors influencing Italian consumers’ willingness to buy and pay for insect-fed poultry products","authors":"G. Tiboldo, N. Casolani, M. C. Reguzzi, F. Cominelli, S. Coderoni, L. Arata, E. Mazzoni","doi":"10.1163/23524588-00001041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe use of insects as a protein source in feed production can significantly improve the sustainability of livestock production. Despite several environmental and animal welfare benefits, the economic sustainability of such an approach depends on the level of consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for insect-fed poultry diets. Using the results of an online survey of more than 850 Italian consumers, we first examine the main differences between two groups of consumers: those who are willing to buy insect-fed poultry meat and eggs and those who are not. The t-test is used to search for statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of their stated preferences for key food attributes that influence purchase decisions, as well as their view on food safety, quality and environmental issues. We then use ordered logit regression to estimate the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay a price premium for insect-fed poultry compared to conventional poultry products. Particular attention is paid to the possible role of trust in the ability of the food system to provide safe food in influencing consumers’ preferences. The results show that consumers who are willing to buy insect-fed meat and eggs are more environmentally aware, have a stronger belief in the crucial role that changes in current food consumption patterns can play for the environment and social well-being, and have a higher level of trust in the system that guarantees food safety. The willingness to pay a price premium for insect-fed poultry food is mainly influenced by respondents’ beliefs about insect-fed poultry food, especially in terms of its expected quality characteristics and animal welfare. Findings from this analysis could provide insights into investments to ensure the economic sustainability of a more circular supply chain.","PeriodicalId":509242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insects as Food and Feed","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insects as Food and Feed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23524588-00001041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of insects as a protein source in feed production can significantly improve the sustainability of livestock production. Despite several environmental and animal welfare benefits, the economic sustainability of such an approach depends on the level of consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for insect-fed poultry diets. Using the results of an online survey of more than 850 Italian consumers, we first examine the main differences between two groups of consumers: those who are willing to buy insect-fed poultry meat and eggs and those who are not. The t-test is used to search for statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of their stated preferences for key food attributes that influence purchase decisions, as well as their view on food safety, quality and environmental issues. We then use ordered logit regression to estimate the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay a price premium for insect-fed poultry compared to conventional poultry products. Particular attention is paid to the possible role of trust in the ability of the food system to provide safe food in influencing consumers’ preferences. The results show that consumers who are willing to buy insect-fed meat and eggs are more environmentally aware, have a stronger belief in the crucial role that changes in current food consumption patterns can play for the environment and social well-being, and have a higher level of trust in the system that guarantees food safety. The willingness to pay a price premium for insect-fed poultry food is mainly influenced by respondents’ beliefs about insect-fed poultry food, especially in terms of its expected quality characteristics and animal welfare. Findings from this analysis could provide insights into investments to ensure the economic sustainability of a more circular supply chain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响意大利消费者购买昆虫喂养家禽产品的意愿和支付意愿的因素
在饲料生产中使用昆虫作为蛋白质来源可显著提高畜牧业生产的可持续性。尽管这种方法对环境和动物福利有诸多益处,但其经济可持续性取决于消费者对昆虫饲喂家禽日粮的接受程度和支付意愿。通过对 850 多名意大利消费者的在线调查结果,我们首先研究了两类消费者之间的主要差异:愿意购买昆虫喂养禽肉和禽蛋的消费者和不愿意购买的消费者。我们使用 t 检验法来寻找两组消费者在影响购买决策的主要食品属性的偏好以及对食品安全、质量和环境问题的看法方面是否存在统计学意义上的显著差异。然后,我们使用有序对数回归法估算消费者愿意为昆虫喂养家禽支付高于传统家禽产品价格的决定因素。我们特别关注了信任食品系统提供安全食品的能力在影响消费者偏好方面可能发挥的作用。研究结果表明,愿意购买昆虫饲养肉类和蛋类的消费者具有更强的环保意识,更相信改变当前的食品消费模式对环境和社会福祉的重要作用,并且对保障食品安全的系统具有更高的信任度。受访者是否愿意为昆虫饲养家禽食品支付溢价主要受其对昆虫饲养家禽食品的看法影响,尤其是对其预期质量特征和动物福利的看法。这一分析结果可为投资提供启示,以确保更循环的供应链的经济可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nutritional and antioxidant properties of two species of edible scarab beetles (Cetonia aurata and Oryctes rhinoceros) Hermetia illucens larvae fat vs coconut oil to obtain free lauric acid-rich products by chemical or enzymatic hydrolysis Edible insects as a sustainable protein source: a meta-analysis Factors influencing Italian consumers’ willingness to buy and pay for insect-fed poultry products Overview of the African palm weevil (Rhynchophorus phoenicis) as food and feed – A critical review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1