Assessment of bulk-fill of resins microhardness longitudinal

Fernanda Santos Araújo, W. M. Takeshita, R. C. D. Amaral, Adriano Augusto Melo de Mendonça
{"title":"Assessment of bulk-fill of resins microhardness longitudinal","authors":"Fernanda Santos Araújo, W. M. Takeshita, R. C. D. Amaral, Adriano Augusto Melo de Mendonça","doi":"10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to assess the polymerization effectiveness of bulk-fill composite resins in longitudinal microhardness. Methods: Blocks of bulk-fill composite resin with thicknesses of 6 mm were analyzed with Vickers microhardness. The resin blocks were divided into two groups (n=6): resin AURA and OPUS. The microhardness test was performed before (base and top) and after (longitudinal microhardness) sectioning the blocks at distances of 2 mm,  4 mm, and 6 mm from the top of the block. The mean microhardness values were tabulated and subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results: The OPUS bulk-fill resin samples presented microhardness means of 55.9 kgf/mm2, 53.7 kgf/mm2, and 49.3 kgf/mm2, the AURA bulk-fill resin samples presented microhardness means of 57,02 kgf/mm2, 55,86 kgf/mm2 e 51,77 kgf/mm2 for the distances of 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm, respectively. Tukey’s statistical test showed a significant difference in microhardness values at different distances of 2 mm,  4 mm, and 6 mm (p<0.001) for each resin. Although there was a statistically significant difference within and between the groups assessed, all samples showed polymerization effectiveness when comparing the top and base of the block. Conclusion: Polymerization was effective in different thicknesses (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm) in both resins studied. The microhardness ratio was adequate when comparing the base and top.","PeriodicalId":504767,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v23i00.8670398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess the polymerization effectiveness of bulk-fill composite resins in longitudinal microhardness. Methods: Blocks of bulk-fill composite resin with thicknesses of 6 mm were analyzed with Vickers microhardness. The resin blocks were divided into two groups (n=6): resin AURA and OPUS. The microhardness test was performed before (base and top) and after (longitudinal microhardness) sectioning the blocks at distances of 2 mm,  4 mm, and 6 mm from the top of the block. The mean microhardness values were tabulated and subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results: The OPUS bulk-fill resin samples presented microhardness means of 55.9 kgf/mm2, 53.7 kgf/mm2, and 49.3 kgf/mm2, the AURA bulk-fill resin samples presented microhardness means of 57,02 kgf/mm2, 55,86 kgf/mm2 e 51,77 kgf/mm2 for the distances of 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm, respectively. Tukey’s statistical test showed a significant difference in microhardness values at different distances of 2 mm,  4 mm, and 6 mm (p<0.001) for each resin. Although there was a statistically significant difference within and between the groups assessed, all samples showed polymerization effectiveness when comparing the top and base of the block. Conclusion: Polymerization was effective in different thicknesses (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm) in both resins studied. The microhardness ratio was adequate when comparing the base and top.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
树脂微硬度纵向体积填充评估
目的:本研究旨在评估体积填充复合树脂在纵向微硬度方面的聚合效果。方法:对厚度为 6 毫米的块状体填充复合树脂进行维氏硬度分析:用维氏硬度分析厚度为 6 毫米的块状填充复合树脂。树脂块分为两组(n=6):AURA 树脂和 OPUS 树脂。显微硬度测试分别在从树脂块顶部开始的 2 毫米、4 毫米和 6 毫米距离处进行(底部和顶部)和(纵向显微硬度)切片之前和之后进行。将平均显微硬度值制成表格,并进行方差分析和 Tukey 检验(P<0.05)。结果OPUS 体积填充树脂样品的显微硬度平均值分别为 55.9 kgf/mm2、53.7 kgf/mm2 和 49.3 kgf/mm2,AURA 体积填充树脂样品在距离 2 mm、4 mm 和 6 mm 处的显微硬度平均值分别为 57.02 kgf/mm2、55.86 kgf/mm2 和 51.77 kgf/mm2。Tukey 统计检验表明,每种树脂在 2 毫米、4 毫米和 6 毫米的不同距离上的显微硬度值差异显著(p<0.001)。尽管在所评估的组内和组间存在显著的统计学差异,但所有样品在块体顶部和底部的聚合效果都有比较。结论所研究的两种树脂在不同厚度(2 毫米、4 毫米和 6 毫米)下的聚合均有效。在比较底部和顶部时,显微硬度比是适当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of change in knowledge, attitude, and practice of medical students towards early childhood oral health following educational intervention Knowledge and conduct of dental students about mouthwash prior to dental procedures amid the COVID-19 pandemic Risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws in menopausal women Accuracy of the integrated electronic apex locator in locating simulated perforation under various irrigating solutions in an in vitro study Histomorphometric comparison of two different preclinical models to evaluate the bone repair in grafted areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1