Organic carbon sink dynamics and carbon sink-source balance in global lakes during the Anthropocene

IF 6.3 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary Fundamental Research Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1016/j.fmre.2024.04.018
Fanfan Meng , Ang Hu , Hao Wu , Kyoung-Soon Jang , Bo Liu , Tianheng Gao , Qinglong Wu , Jianjun Wang
{"title":"Organic carbon sink dynamics and carbon sink-source balance in global lakes during the Anthropocene","authors":"Fanfan Meng ,&nbsp;Ang Hu ,&nbsp;Hao Wu ,&nbsp;Kyoung-Soon Jang ,&nbsp;Bo Liu ,&nbsp;Tianheng Gao ,&nbsp;Qinglong Wu ,&nbsp;Jianjun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.fmre.2024.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The carbon burial and greenhouse gas emissions of lakes are pivotal in the global carbon cycle to offset or accelerate global warming. However, their balance or the magnitude of anthropogenic increase of carbon burial remains uncertain in global lakes. Here, we quantified the carbon sink dynamics and the sink-source balance in global lakes with effect-size metrics, that is, the log-response ratio of organic carbon burial between post-1950 and pre-1900 periods and the carbon balance ratio between carbon burial and greenhouse gas emissions, respectively. The organic carbon burial ratios revealed an average increase of 2.45 times in carbon burial rates during the Anthropocene, while the carbon balance ratios were negative in 82.68% of lakes, indicating that most lakes had lower burial rates than emission rates and acted as carbon sources rather than carbon sinks. The organic carbon burial ratios exhibited a significantly decreasing latitudinal trend and were mainly influenced by lake’s trophic state with the explained variation of 44.79%. They were also indirectly influenced by climate, lake morphometry, and catchment properties through their interactions with the lake’s trophic state. The carbon balance ratios, however, showed a nonsignificant latitudinal trend. They were primarily affected by lake catchment properties with the explained variation of 26.21% and were also indirectly affected by climate variables via the interactions with catchment properties. Overall, our study highlights that human activities such as lake eutrophication and catchment changes have altered the carbon sink and source in global lakes during the Anthropocene, and are essential drivers for future evaluations of lake carbon budgets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34602,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental Research","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 974-985"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325824002000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The carbon burial and greenhouse gas emissions of lakes are pivotal in the global carbon cycle to offset or accelerate global warming. However, their balance or the magnitude of anthropogenic increase of carbon burial remains uncertain in global lakes. Here, we quantified the carbon sink dynamics and the sink-source balance in global lakes with effect-size metrics, that is, the log-response ratio of organic carbon burial between post-1950 and pre-1900 periods and the carbon balance ratio between carbon burial and greenhouse gas emissions, respectively. The organic carbon burial ratios revealed an average increase of 2.45 times in carbon burial rates during the Anthropocene, while the carbon balance ratios were negative in 82.68% of lakes, indicating that most lakes had lower burial rates than emission rates and acted as carbon sources rather than carbon sinks. The organic carbon burial ratios exhibited a significantly decreasing latitudinal trend and were mainly influenced by lake’s trophic state with the explained variation of 44.79%. They were also indirectly influenced by climate, lake morphometry, and catchment properties through their interactions with the lake’s trophic state. The carbon balance ratios, however, showed a nonsignificant latitudinal trend. They were primarily affected by lake catchment properties with the explained variation of 26.21% and were also indirectly affected by climate variables via the interactions with catchment properties. Overall, our study highlights that human activities such as lake eutrophication and catchment changes have altered the carbon sink and source in global lakes during the Anthropocene, and are essential drivers for future evaluations of lake carbon budgets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类世期间全球湖泊的有机碳汇动态和碳汇源平衡
湖泊的碳埋藏和温室气体排放在全球碳循环中起着抵消或加速全球变暖的关键作用。然而,在全球湖泊中,它们的平衡或人为碳埋藏增加的幅度仍不确定。本文采用效应大小指标(即1950年以后和1900年以前的有机碳埋藏对数响应比、碳埋藏与温室气体排放的碳平衡比)量化了全球湖泊的碳汇动态和汇源平衡。有机碳埋藏率在人类世期间平均增加了2.45倍,而82.68%的湖泊碳平衡率为负,表明大多数湖泊的埋藏率低于排放率,是碳源而不是碳汇。有机碳埋藏率在纬度上呈显著下降趋势,主要受湖泊营养状态的影响,解释变异率为44.79%。它们还通过与湖泊营养状态的相互作用间接地受到气候、湖泊形态和集水区特性的影响。碳平衡比的纬向变化趋势不显著。主要受湖泊集水区性质的影响,解释变异率为26.21%,气候变量也通过与集水区性质的相互作用间接影响。总体而言,我们的研究强调,人类活动(如湖泊富营养化和流域变化)改变了人类世期间全球湖泊的碳汇和碳源,并且是未来湖泊碳收支评估的重要驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fundamental Research
Fundamental Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
1.60%
发文量
294
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Outside Front Cover Pore segmentation and shielding: A dual strategy to prepare sub-nanometer covalent-organic-framework based membranes for selective metal ion sieving Capture and identification of the electrogenerated picosecond intermediates by mass spectrometry Harmine ameliorates steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head by modulating metabolism and ferroptosis via HIF1-α Discovery of Zidovudine as a cardiomyocyte protectant for doxorubicin-induced toxicity through high-throughput phenotypic drug screening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1