Can competitive effects and responses of alien and native species predict invasion outcomes?

IF 6.3 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary Fundamental Research Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-12 DOI:10.1016/j.fmre.2024.05.001
Tingting Wu , Yuanzhi Li , Marc W. Cadotte , Oscar Godoy , Chengjin Chu
{"title":"Can competitive effects and responses of alien and native species predict invasion outcomes?","authors":"Tingting Wu ,&nbsp;Yuanzhi Li ,&nbsp;Marc W. Cadotte ,&nbsp;Oscar Godoy ,&nbsp;Chengjin Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.fmre.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relative competitive ability of native and alien species, which consists of competitive effect (CE) and response (CR), has often been invoked as a key determinant of invasion success. Previous studies have reported that an alien species with a high CE and/or a low CR would successfully invade a native species. However, no studies have yet empirically examined the hypothesis or tested the consistency of invasion outcomes predicted by the CE-CR framework and modern species coexistence theory (MCT). To fill this research gap, we conducted a pairwise competition experiment between five alien and five native species, quantified CE and CR based on their biomass in the absence and presence of <em>one</em> competitor, and predicted invasion outcomes based on both CE-CR and MCT frameworks. We have demonstrated theoretically that the CE and CR frequently measured in previous work are only approximations of interspecific competitive coefficients, and thus could not completely predict the invasion outcomes. As we expected, the invasion outcomes predicted by the CE-CR framework were partially consistent with the predictions by the MCT framework. Specifically, aliens with low CR and high CE tended to exclude natives, while aliens with high CR and low CE tended to be excluded by natives according to MCT. In contrast, pairs of stable coexistence and priority effects did not conform to the theoretical expectation. Despite the theoretical defects of the CE-CR framework, it can provide some useful value in predicting the invasion outcomes, especially when intrinsic growth rate and intraspecific competition coefficients are not available. Our study is the first to compare invasion outcomes separately derived from qualitative (the CE-CR framework) and quantitative (the MCT framework) methods. We recommend that future research should adopt quantitative approaches such as MCT as far as possible, to more comprehensively understand and predict the biotic outcomes of interacting species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34602,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental Research","volume":"5 6","pages":"Pages 2671-2677"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325824002061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relative competitive ability of native and alien species, which consists of competitive effect (CE) and response (CR), has often been invoked as a key determinant of invasion success. Previous studies have reported that an alien species with a high CE and/or a low CR would successfully invade a native species. However, no studies have yet empirically examined the hypothesis or tested the consistency of invasion outcomes predicted by the CE-CR framework and modern species coexistence theory (MCT). To fill this research gap, we conducted a pairwise competition experiment between five alien and five native species, quantified CE and CR based on their biomass in the absence and presence of one competitor, and predicted invasion outcomes based on both CE-CR and MCT frameworks. We have demonstrated theoretically that the CE and CR frequently measured in previous work are only approximations of interspecific competitive coefficients, and thus could not completely predict the invasion outcomes. As we expected, the invasion outcomes predicted by the CE-CR framework were partially consistent with the predictions by the MCT framework. Specifically, aliens with low CR and high CE tended to exclude natives, while aliens with high CR and low CE tended to be excluded by natives according to MCT. In contrast, pairs of stable coexistence and priority effects did not conform to the theoretical expectation. Despite the theoretical defects of the CE-CR framework, it can provide some useful value in predicting the invasion outcomes, especially when intrinsic growth rate and intraspecific competition coefficients are not available. Our study is the first to compare invasion outcomes separately derived from qualitative (the CE-CR framework) and quantitative (the MCT framework) methods. We recommend that future research should adopt quantitative approaches such as MCT as far as possible, to more comprehensively understand and predict the biotic outcomes of interacting species.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外来物种和本地物种的竞争效应和反应能否预测入侵结果?
本地和外来物种的相对竞争能力,包括竞争效应(CE)和反应(CR),通常被认为是入侵成功的关键决定因素。以前的研究报道了具有高CE和/或低CR的外来物种能够成功入侵本地物种。然而,目前还没有研究对这一假设进行实证检验,也没有研究对CE-CR框架与现代物种共存理论(MCT)预测的入侵结果的一致性进行检验。为了填补这一研究空白,我们在5种外来物种和5种本地物种之间进行了配对竞争实验,根据缺乏和存在一个竞争对手时的生物量量化了CE和CR,并基于CE-CR和MCT框架预测了入侵结果。我们已经从理论上证明,以往工作中经常测量的CE和CR只是种间竞争系数的近似值,因此不能完全预测入侵结果。正如我们所料,CE-CR框架预测的入侵结果与MCT框架的预测部分一致。具体来说,根据MCT,低CR和高CE的外来者倾向于排斥本地人,而高CR和低CE的外来者倾向于被本地人排斥。而对稳定共存和优先效应则不符合理论预期。尽管CE-CR框架存在理论缺陷,但它在预测入侵结果方面具有一定的实用价值,特别是在内在生长速率和种内竞争系数不确定的情况下。我们的研究首次比较了定性(CE-CR框架)和定量(MCT框架)方法分别得出的入侵结果。我们建议未来的研究应尽可能采用MCT等定量方法,以更全面地了解和预测相互作用物种的生物结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fundamental Research
Fundamental Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
1.60%
发文量
294
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Outside Front Cover Pore segmentation and shielding: A dual strategy to prepare sub-nanometer covalent-organic-framework based membranes for selective metal ion sieving Capture and identification of the electrogenerated picosecond intermediates by mass spectrometry Harmine ameliorates steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head by modulating metabolism and ferroptosis via HIF1-α Discovery of Zidovudine as a cardiomyocyte protectant for doxorubicin-induced toxicity through high-throughput phenotypic drug screening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1