Cell-based influenza vaccines: An effective vaccine option for under 60-year-olds.

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2024-04-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000476
Barbara C Gärtner, Dietmar Beier, Gunther Gosch, Klaus Wahle, Luise Wendt, Laura-Christin Förster, Kim J Schmidt, Tino F Schwarz
{"title":"Cell-based influenza vaccines: An effective vaccine option for under 60-year-olds.","authors":"Barbara C Gärtner, Dietmar Beier, Gunther Gosch, Klaus Wahle, Luise Wendt, Laura-Christin Förster, Kim J Schmidt, Tino F Schwarz","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Seasonal influenza poses a significant burden of disease, affecting not only older adults but also individuals under the age of 60. It carries a high economic burden, mainly driven by influenza-associated productivity losses in the working population. Conventional egg-based influenza vaccines may have reduced effectiveness due to antigen adaptation in eggs. In contrast, cell-based influenza vaccines are less likely to be affected by such antigen adaptation. This review aims to present real-world data (RWD) comparing the effectiveness of quadrivalent cell-based (QIVc) and egg-based (QIVe) influenza vaccines over three consecutive seasons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive review was conducted, analyzing RWD from retrospective cohort and case-control studies on the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of QIVc versus QIVe during the 2017/18-2019/20 seasons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included six retrospective cohort studies and one case-control study, with a combined total of approximately 29 million participants. A cohort study involving people aged ≥4 years during the 2017/18 season showed a statistically significant rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-like illness, with a value of 36.2%. QIVc demonstrated statistically significant superiority over QIVe in preventing outpatient and inpatient medical encounters as observed in two cohort studies conducted during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 seasons. The rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe was found to be 7.6% in individuals aged ≥4 years and 9.5% in individuals aged ≥18 years. Three additional cohort studies conducted between 2017/18-2019/20 reported a statistically significant improvement in rVE (5.3-14.4%) of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits due to influenza in individuals aged 4-64 years. In a case-control study across all three seasons, QIVc showed statistically significantly higher effectiveness compared to QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza, with rVEs of 10.0-14.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RWD from the 2017/18-2019/20 seasons demonstrated that QIVc is more effective than QIVe in preventing influenza-related outcomes in individuals aged 4-64 years. Preferential use of cell-based influenza vaccines, as opposed to conventional egg-based vaccines, could reduce the burden of influenza-related symptoms on individuals and alleviate the economic impact on the German population under 60 years of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11099537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Seasonal influenza poses a significant burden of disease, affecting not only older adults but also individuals under the age of 60. It carries a high economic burden, mainly driven by influenza-associated productivity losses in the working population. Conventional egg-based influenza vaccines may have reduced effectiveness due to antigen adaptation in eggs. In contrast, cell-based influenza vaccines are less likely to be affected by such antigen adaptation. This review aims to present real-world data (RWD) comparing the effectiveness of quadrivalent cell-based (QIVc) and egg-based (QIVe) influenza vaccines over three consecutive seasons.

Methods: A comprehensive review was conducted, analyzing RWD from retrospective cohort and case-control studies on the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of QIVc versus QIVe during the 2017/18-2019/20 seasons.

Results: This study included six retrospective cohort studies and one case-control study, with a combined total of approximately 29 million participants. A cohort study involving people aged ≥4 years during the 2017/18 season showed a statistically significant rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-like illness, with a value of 36.2%. QIVc demonstrated statistically significant superiority over QIVe in preventing outpatient and inpatient medical encounters as observed in two cohort studies conducted during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 seasons. The rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe was found to be 7.6% in individuals aged ≥4 years and 9.5% in individuals aged ≥18 years. Three additional cohort studies conducted between 2017/18-2019/20 reported a statistically significant improvement in rVE (5.3-14.4%) of QIVc compared to QIVe in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits due to influenza in individuals aged 4-64 years. In a case-control study across all three seasons, QIVc showed statistically significantly higher effectiveness compared to QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza, with rVEs of 10.0-14.8%.

Conclusions: RWD from the 2017/18-2019/20 seasons demonstrated that QIVc is more effective than QIVe in preventing influenza-related outcomes in individuals aged 4-64 years. Preferential use of cell-based influenza vaccines, as opposed to conventional egg-based vaccines, could reduce the burden of influenza-related symptoms on individuals and alleviate the economic impact on the German population under 60 years of age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细胞流感疫苗:60 岁以下人群的有效疫苗选择。
目的:季节性流感是一种严重的疾病负担,不仅影响老年人,也影响 60 岁以下的人。流感造成的经济负担很高,主要是由于流感导致劳动人口生产力下降。由于抗原在鸡蛋中的适应性,传统的蛋基流感疫苗可能会降低效果。相比之下,细胞流感疫苗受这种抗原适应性影响的可能性较小。本综述旨在提供真实世界的数据(RWD),比较四价细胞型(QIVc)和蛋基型(QIVe)流感疫苗在连续三个季节的有效性:对2017/18-2019/20流感季期间QIVc与QIVe的相对疫苗效力(rVE)的回顾性队列和病例对照研究的RWD进行了全面回顾分析:这项研究包括六项回顾性队列研究和一项病例对照研究,总计约有 2900 万参与者。2017/18流行季期间,一项涉及年龄≥4岁人群的队列研究显示,与QIVe相比,QIVc在预防流感样疾病方面的RVE具有显著的统计学意义,数值为36.2%。在 2018/19 和 2019/20 季度进行的两项队列研究中观察到,QIVc 在预防门诊病人和住院病人就诊方面比 QIVe 具有显著的统计学优势。研究发现,与 QIVe 相比,QIVc 对年龄≥4 岁的人的预防率为 7.6%,对年龄≥18 岁的人的预防率为 9.5%。2017/18-2019/20年间进行的另外三项队列研究报告称,与QIVe相比,QIVc在预防4-64岁人群因流感导致的流感相关住院和急诊就诊方面的rVE(5.3-14.4%)有显著的统计学改善。在一项横跨三个季节的病例对照研究中,与QIVe相比,QIVc在预防经测试确诊的流感方面的有效性在统计学上明显更高,rVE为10.0-14.8%:2017/18-2019/20流感季的RWD表明,在预防4-64岁人群的流感相关结果方面,QIVc比QIVe更有效。相对于传统的蛋基疫苗,优先使用细胞型流感疫苗可减轻流感相关症状对个人造成的负担,并减轻对德国 60 岁以下人口的经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
S2k-Guideline hand antisepsis and hand hygiene. Alcohol-based hand rubs can fulfil efficacy requirements of EN 1500 in 15 seconds. Medical associations and expert committees urge that ethanol be approved as a virucidal active substance for use in hand antiseptics under the European Biocidal Products Regulation, without a CMR classification. Assessment of the knowledge of healthcare workers on monkeypox in Nigeria. Vaccination status, awareness, and its correlates among healthcare workers in the Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR): a mixed-method study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1