Equivalent reduction of Escherichia coli by rinsing hands with cold and warm water.

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000527
Romana Kordasiewicz-Stingler, Michael Reiter, Günter Kampf, Jürgen Gebel, Carola Ilschner, Miranda Suchomel
{"title":"Equivalent reduction of Escherichia coli by rinsing hands with cold and warm water.","authors":"Romana Kordasiewicz-Stingler, Michael Reiter, Günter Kampf, Jürgen Gebel, Carola Ilschner, Miranda Suchomel","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hand washing is considered an important public health intervention to reduce the burden of communicable diseases such as gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections. Washbasins in public restrooms are often only equipped with cold water and it can be observed that people only rinse their hands briefly after using the toilet instead of washing them properly with soap. As there are no recommendations on the optimal water temperature for efficacy, we measured the efficacy of simple hand rinsing with cold (4°C) and warm (40°C) water for 10 and 20 seconds compared to the European Norm EN 1499 reference hand wash.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Latin square design was used with five treatment groups and three participants per group. Hands were contaminated by immersion in an <i>Escherichia coli</i> suspension. Before and after the respective treatment fingertips were sampled to obtain pre- and post-values. Pre- and post-values were averaged separately for each volunteer and the arithmetic means of all individual lg reductions were calculated and compared using Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed rank tests (one-sided, P<0.05). Post hoc test of differences between treatmets was done by Tukey's honest significant difference tests, P<0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rinsing hands for 10 seconds with cold (1.93 lg) or warm water (2.01 lg), and for 20 seconds with cold (2.23 lg) or warm water (2.39 lg) was significantly inferior to the 1 minute reference hand wash with sapo kalinus (2.68 lg), but there were no significant differences between the use of cold or warm water in the pairwise comparison for both times. However, the duration seems to have an effect on the bacterial reduction as the differences between the hand rinsing times were significant for both temperatures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rinsing hands with cold water was as effective as warm water. Its implementation in the community could save energy and resources without losing any efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":"19 ","pages":"Doc72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hand washing is considered an important public health intervention to reduce the burden of communicable diseases such as gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections. Washbasins in public restrooms are often only equipped with cold water and it can be observed that people only rinse their hands briefly after using the toilet instead of washing them properly with soap. As there are no recommendations on the optimal water temperature for efficacy, we measured the efficacy of simple hand rinsing with cold (4°C) and warm (40°C) water for 10 and 20 seconds compared to the European Norm EN 1499 reference hand wash.

Methods: A Latin square design was used with five treatment groups and three participants per group. Hands were contaminated by immersion in an Escherichia coli suspension. Before and after the respective treatment fingertips were sampled to obtain pre- and post-values. Pre- and post-values were averaged separately for each volunteer and the arithmetic means of all individual lg reductions were calculated and compared using Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed rank tests (one-sided, P<0.05). Post hoc test of differences between treatmets was done by Tukey's honest significant difference tests, P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Rinsing hands for 10 seconds with cold (1.93 lg) or warm water (2.01 lg), and for 20 seconds with cold (2.23 lg) or warm water (2.39 lg) was significantly inferior to the 1 minute reference hand wash with sapo kalinus (2.68 lg), but there were no significant differences between the use of cold or warm water in the pairwise comparison for both times. However, the duration seems to have an effect on the bacterial reduction as the differences between the hand rinsing times were significant for both temperatures.

Conclusion: Rinsing hands with cold water was as effective as warm water. Its implementation in the community could save energy and resources without losing any efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用冷水和温水洗手可减少大肠杆菌的数量。
目的:洗手被认为是一项重要的公共卫生干预措施,可以减少胃肠道和呼吸道感染等传染病的负担。公共卫生间的洗手池通常只配备冷水,可以观察到人们在上完厕所后只会短暂地洗手,而不是用肥皂正确地洗手。由于没有关于最佳洗手水温的建议,我们测量了用冷水(4°C)和温水(40°C)冲洗10秒和20秒的简单洗手效果,并与欧洲标准EN 1499参考洗手进行了比较。方法:采用拉丁方设计,5个治疗组,每组3人。双手因浸泡在大肠杆菌悬浮液中而被污染。分别对治疗前后的指尖进行采样,得到治疗前后的值。对每个志愿者分别取前值和后值的平均值,并计算所有个体lg减少的算术平均值,并使用Wilcoxon配对对符号秩检验(单侧,结果:用冷水(1.93 lg)或温水(2.01 lg)洗手10秒,用冷水(2.23 lg)或温水(2.39 lg)洗手20秒,明显低于用皂液洗手1分钟(2.68 lg),但在两两比较中,冷水和温水的使用没有显著差异。然而,持续时间似乎对细菌的减少有影响,因为在两种温度下,洗手时间的差异是显著的。结论:冷水洗手与温水洗手效果相同。在社区中实施,既能节约能源资源,又不会失去任何功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Equivalent reduction of Escherichia coli by rinsing hands with cold and warm water. Etiologic assessment of palatal petechiae - a case report. Investigation of the efficiency of different reprocessing methods on disposable laryngeal masks contaminated with HBV DNA. Monkeypox: Oral manifestation as diagnostic indicator. Online survey on barriers and drivers to flu vaccination among staff at a German university hospital during the Covid-19 pandemic 2022 (flu-vaccination motive study).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1