False-positive Findings of Large Vessel Vasculitis on FDG-PET in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1097/CJI.0000000000000527
Dylan Johnson, Shahin Jamal, Ryan W Hung, Carrie Ye
{"title":"False-positive Findings of Large Vessel Vasculitis on FDG-PET in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.","authors":"Dylan Johnson, Shahin Jamal, Ryan W Hung, Carrie Ye","doi":"10.1097/CJI.0000000000000527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxygluocose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is increasingly used in the evaluation of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Incidental findings of increased vessel wall uptake may prompt the concern for ICI-induced large vessel vasculitis (LVV). Precise radiographic and clinical evaluation is required to determine if this represents true vasculitis, as use of immune suppression and ICI discontinuation can have significant impacts on patient outcomes. We performed a retrospective case analysis of 4 consecutive patients referred to 2 rheumatology clinics treated with ICI with incidental findings of LVV on FDG-PET, reviewing their clinical course and radiographic findings. All 4 cases had FDG-PET scans for routine oncology indications and had no associated clinical features of LVV. One patient was treated with corticosteroids and no patients developed any clinical evidence of vasculitis during a mean follow-up period of 17 months (range: 7-33 mo). All FDG-PET images reporting LVV underwent a standardized analysis to identify any technical issues or concerns with interpretation. In review of imaging, 3 of the cases may have been due to delayed tracer to scan interval leading to misinterpretation of vascular uptake as suspected LVV. Recognition of technical pitfalls in FDG-PET interpretation is crucial to inform the need for immunosuppression and the safety of continued ICI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"275-278"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxygluocose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is increasingly used in the evaluation of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Incidental findings of increased vessel wall uptake may prompt the concern for ICI-induced large vessel vasculitis (LVV). Precise radiographic and clinical evaluation is required to determine if this represents true vasculitis, as use of immune suppression and ICI discontinuation can have significant impacts on patient outcomes. We performed a retrospective case analysis of 4 consecutive patients referred to 2 rheumatology clinics treated with ICI with incidental findings of LVV on FDG-PET, reviewing their clinical course and radiographic findings. All 4 cases had FDG-PET scans for routine oncology indications and had no associated clinical features of LVV. One patient was treated with corticosteroids and no patients developed any clinical evidence of vasculitis during a mean follow-up period of 17 months (range: 7-33 mo). All FDG-PET images reporting LVV underwent a standardized analysis to identify any technical issues or concerns with interpretation. In review of imaging, 3 of the cases may have been due to delayed tracer to scan interval leading to misinterpretation of vascular uptake as suspected LVV. Recognition of technical pitfalls in FDG-PET interpretation is crucial to inform the need for immunosuppression and the safety of continued ICI therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫检查点抑制剂治疗患者的 FDG-PET 大血管炎假阳性发现
氟-18-脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)越来越多地用于评估免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)疗法的反应。偶然发现的血管壁摄取增加可能会引发对 ICI 诱导的大血管炎(LVV)的担忧。由于使用免疫抑制剂和停用 ICI 会对患者预后产生重大影响,因此需要进行精确的放射学和临床评估,以确定这是否代表真正的血管炎。我们对转诊至两家风湿病诊所接受 ICI 治疗并在 FDG-PET 上偶然发现 LVV 的 4 例连续患者进行了回顾性病例分析,回顾了他们的临床病程和影像学检查结果。这4例患者都是因常规肿瘤适应症而进行FDG-PET扫描,没有相关的左心室静脉瘤临床特征。一名患者接受了皮质类固醇治疗,在平均 17 个月(7-33 个月)的随访期间,没有患者出现任何血管炎的临床症状。所有报告左心室积液的 FDG-PET 图像都经过了标准化分析,以确定任何技术问题或解释问题。在对成像进行复查时,有 3 例病例可能是由于示踪剂与扫描时间间隔延迟,导致血管摄取被误认为是疑似左心室变性。识别 FDG-PET 解读中的技术误区对于确定免疫抑制的必要性和继续 ICI 治疗的安全性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Immunotherapy
Journal of Immunotherapy 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Immunotherapy features rapid publication of articles on immunomodulators, lymphokines, antibodies, cells, and cell products in cancer biology and therapy. Laboratory and preclinical studies, as well as investigative clinical reports, are presented. The journal emphasizes basic mechanisms and methods for the rapid transfer of technology from the laboratory to the clinic. JIT contains full-length articles, review articles, and short communications.
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning-enhanced Signature of Metastasis-related T Cell Marker Genes for Predicting Overall Survival in Malignant Melanoma. Intersecting Blood Cytokines With Cholesterol Parameters to Profile Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Generation and Characterization of Ex Vivo Expanded Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes From Renal Cell Carcinoma Tumors for Adoptive Cell Therapy. Blood Tumor Mutational Burden Alone Is Not a Good Predictive Biomarker for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Gastrointestinal Tumors. Gene and Protein Expression of MAGE and Associated Immune Landscape Elements in Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma and Urothelial Carcinomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1