Stereotactic biopsy with contrast-enhanced mammography: the initial Australian experience

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.13663
Natalie Layden, Genevieve Sesnan, Meredith Kessell, Mireille Hardie, Donna Taylor
{"title":"Stereotactic biopsy with contrast-enhanced mammography: the initial Australian experience","authors":"Natalie Layden,&nbsp;Genevieve Sesnan,&nbsp;Meredith Kessell,&nbsp;Mireille Hardie,&nbsp;Donna Taylor","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and MRI detect ‘contrast-only’ lesions (COLs) occult on standard breast imaging (ultrasound and conventional mammography). Until recently, MRI was the only reliable method of biopsy. This study presents the first Australian experience with CEM-guided biopsy (CEMBx) and the lessons learnt.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective audit of the first 15 consecutive patients who underwent CEMBx for COLs was performed. Indications for contrast imaging, patient and lesion characteristics, procedural details, radiation dose and pathology data were collected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The 15 women were aged 37–81 years (mean 59 years). Indications for contrast imaging were problem solving (<i>n</i> = 3), moderate risk screening (<i>n</i> = 2), cancer staging (<i>n</i> = 9) and symptoms (<i>n</i> = 1). The COLs were non-mass (<i>n</i> = 14), mass (<i>n</i> = 1) and an enhancing asymmetry (<i>n</i> = 1). For one patient, two lesions were sampled during the same event. All lesions enhanced and were successfully sampled followed by marker clip insertion. Most biopsies (87.5%) were performed with the breast in cranio-caudal compression using a horizontal approach. Procedural duration ranged from 13 to 33 min (mean 22 min). Radiation dose was similar to standard stereotactic biopsy. Post-biopsy hematomas occurred in three patients, none required intervention. Clip displacement occurred in three cases. Core biopsy histopathology results were benign (<i>n</i> = 8), malignant (<i>n</i> = 7) and a borderline breast lesion (BBL) (<i>n</i> = 1). Patient satisfaction rates were high. Imaging follow-up is ongoing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CEMBx is a quick, safe and reliable alternative to MRIBx to sample COLs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 4","pages":"393-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13663","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and MRI detect ‘contrast-only’ lesions (COLs) occult on standard breast imaging (ultrasound and conventional mammography). Until recently, MRI was the only reliable method of biopsy. This study presents the first Australian experience with CEM-guided biopsy (CEMBx) and the lessons learnt.

Methods

A prospective audit of the first 15 consecutive patients who underwent CEMBx for COLs was performed. Indications for contrast imaging, patient and lesion characteristics, procedural details, radiation dose and pathology data were collected.

Results

The 15 women were aged 37–81 years (mean 59 years). Indications for contrast imaging were problem solving (n = 3), moderate risk screening (n = 2), cancer staging (n = 9) and symptoms (n = 1). The COLs were non-mass (n = 14), mass (n = 1) and an enhancing asymmetry (n = 1). For one patient, two lesions were sampled during the same event. All lesions enhanced and were successfully sampled followed by marker clip insertion. Most biopsies (87.5%) were performed with the breast in cranio-caudal compression using a horizontal approach. Procedural duration ranged from 13 to 33 min (mean 22 min). Radiation dose was similar to standard stereotactic biopsy. Post-biopsy hematomas occurred in three patients, none required intervention. Clip displacement occurred in three cases. Core biopsy histopathology results were benign (n = 8), malignant (n = 7) and a borderline breast lesion (BBL) (n = 1). Patient satisfaction rates were high. Imaging follow-up is ongoing.

Conclusions

CEMBx is a quick, safe and reliable alternative to MRIBx to sample COLs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向活检与造影剂增强乳腺摄影:澳大利亚的初步经验。
导言:对比度增强乳腺 X 射线造影术(CEM)和磁共振成像(MRI)可检测出标准乳腺成像(超声波和传统乳腺 X 射线造影术)无法发现的 "纯对比度 "病变(COL)。直到最近,核磁共振成像仍是唯一可靠的活检方法。本研究介绍了澳大利亚首次使用CEM引导活检(CEMBx)的经验和教训:方法:对首批连续接受CEMBx检查的15名COL患者进行了前瞻性审计。收集了造影剂成像的指征、患者和病变特征、手术细节、辐射剂量和病理数据:15名女性的年龄在37-81岁之间(平均59岁)。造影剂成像的适应症为解决问题(3 例)、中度风险筛查(2 例)、癌症分期(9 例)和症状(1 例)。COL为非肿块(14 例)、肿块(1 例)和增强不对称(1 例)。一名患者在同一事件中对两个病灶进行了取样。所有病变均增强并成功取样,随后插入标记夹。大多数活检(87.5%)都是在乳房颅尾受压的情况下使用水平方法进行的。手术时间从 13 到 33 分钟不等(平均 22 分钟)。放射剂量与标准立体定向活检相似。三名患者在活检后出现血肿,但都不需要干预。三例患者出现夹子移位。核心活检组织病理学结果为良性(8 例)、恶性(7 例)和边缘性乳腺病变(1 例)。患者满意度很高。成像随访仍在进行中:CEMBx是MRIBx取样COL的一种快速、安全、可靠的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Pathology and risk stratification-based evaluation of ovarian masses on MRI. Preoperative surgical planning MRI for fibroids: What the surgeon needs to know and what to report. Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Pneumothorax and Intercostal Catheter Insertion Following CT-Guided Lung Biopsy. Characterising high-risk plaque on cardiac CT. Evaluation of plan quality, safety, and toxicity of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in an Australian setting following changes in prescription and applicator design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1