A pilot study of performance enhancement coaching for newly appointed urology registrars.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Scottish Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1177/00369330241252715
Lilli Cooper, Karan Wadhwa, Mark Rochester, Chandra Shekhar Biyani, Ruth Doherty
{"title":"A pilot study of performance enhancement coaching for newly appointed urology registrars.","authors":"Lilli Cooper, Karan Wadhwa, Mark Rochester, Chandra Shekhar Biyani, Ruth Doherty","doi":"10.1177/00369330241252715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the feasibility of performance enhancement coaching (PEC) for newly appointed Urology registrars (ST3s), specifically: whether the concept appealed, and which areas beyond technical skills acquisition were felt to be most relevant or useful.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>All delegates on the Urology Bootcamp 2023 were invited to take part in an online survey before and after a 2-hour PEC workshop, collecting: basic demographic data, performance challenges, and the important aspects to include in, and consider with, a coaching programme. The workshop was delivered by a surgeon with a professional coaching qualification, to groups of four delegates at a time over 4 days. Ten pre-defined areas were offered during the session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On a scale of 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent), the 62 participants' overall health was reported as a median of 8/10 (physical) and 7/10 (mental). Anxiety during performance was the most common concern (63%) and was accompanied by a tremor in 55%. The next most popular concerns, with 19% of responses each, were: sleep, insufficient operative skill or expertise, and worry about relationships with trainers. The commonest topics discussed were 'the inner critic' (100%), 'autonomic modulation' (69%), 'not working, well' (13%) and 'optimising study' (6%). Seventy-seven per cent were unaware of PEC for practising surgeons. All respondents felt that they would benefit from PEC to some extent (80% ≥8/10 where 10/10 was 'very useful'), ideally at the ST3 level. Sixty-two percent of respondents said there should be a fee for trainees, whereas 38% thought it should be free and paid for by their training authorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concept of PEC is acceptable to ST3 Urology trainees, with particular interest in techniques to mitigate negative self-talk and autonomic modulation techniques. Existing barriers to coaching for the surgical community would need to be addressed in designing an acceptable coaching programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330241252715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the feasibility of performance enhancement coaching (PEC) for newly appointed Urology registrars (ST3s), specifically: whether the concept appealed, and which areas beyond technical skills acquisition were felt to be most relevant or useful.

Subjects and methods: All delegates on the Urology Bootcamp 2023 were invited to take part in an online survey before and after a 2-hour PEC workshop, collecting: basic demographic data, performance challenges, and the important aspects to include in, and consider with, a coaching programme. The workshop was delivered by a surgeon with a professional coaching qualification, to groups of four delegates at a time over 4 days. Ten pre-defined areas were offered during the session.

Results: On a scale of 1 (poor) to 10 (excellent), the 62 participants' overall health was reported as a median of 8/10 (physical) and 7/10 (mental). Anxiety during performance was the most common concern (63%) and was accompanied by a tremor in 55%. The next most popular concerns, with 19% of responses each, were: sleep, insufficient operative skill or expertise, and worry about relationships with trainers. The commonest topics discussed were 'the inner critic' (100%), 'autonomic modulation' (69%), 'not working, well' (13%) and 'optimising study' (6%). Seventy-seven per cent were unaware of PEC for practising surgeons. All respondents felt that they would benefit from PEC to some extent (80% ≥8/10 where 10/10 was 'very useful'), ideally at the ST3 level. Sixty-two percent of respondents said there should be a fee for trainees, whereas 38% thought it should be free and paid for by their training authorities.

Conclusion: The concept of PEC is acceptable to ST3 Urology trainees, with particular interest in techniques to mitigate negative self-talk and autonomic modulation techniques. Existing barriers to coaching for the surgical community would need to be addressed in designing an acceptable coaching programme.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对新任命的泌尿外科注册医师进行绩效提升辅导的试点研究。
目标:评估为新任命的泌尿外科注册医师(ST3)提供绩效提升辅导(PEC)的可行性,特别是:这一概念是否具有吸引力,以及在技术技能学习之外,哪些方面被认为是最相关或最有用的:所有参加 2023 年泌尿外科训练营的代表都被邀请在 2 小时 PEC 研讨班前后参加在线调查,调查内容包括:基本人口统计学数据、绩效挑战、辅导计划中应包含和考虑的重要方面。工作坊由一名具有专业教练资格的外科医生主讲,每次四名代表一组,为期四天。培训期间提供了十个预先确定的领域:在 1 分(差)到 10 分(优秀)的评分中,62 名学员的总体健康状况中位数为 8/10(身体)和 7/10(精神)。表演时的焦虑是最常见的问题(63%),55%的人伴有震颤。其次是睡眠、操作技能或专业知识不足以及担心与培训师的关系,各占 19%。最常见的话题是 "内心的批评"(100%)、"自主神经调节"(69%)、"工作不顺利"(13%)和 "优化学习"(6%)。77%的受访者不知道外科医生也可以进行 PEC。所有受访者都认为他们将在一定程度上受益于 PEC(80% ≥8/10,其中 10/10 为 "非常有用"),最好是在 ST3 级别。62% 的受访者认为,受训者应付费,而 38% 的受访者认为,应由培训机构免费支付:结论:ST3 级泌尿外科学员可以接受 "PEC "的概念,他们对减轻负面自言自语的技巧和自主神经调节技巧尤其感兴趣。在设计可接受的辅导计划时,需要解决外科群体在辅导方面的现有障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Pancreatic insulinomas: Our 15-year surgical experience. Efficacy and outcomes of a highland prehospital trauma response team. Ribosome-binding protein-1 (RRBP1) expression in prostate carcinomas and its relationship with clinicopathological prognostic factors. A pilot study of performance enhancement coaching for newly appointed urology registrars. Optimising the use of colonoscopy to improve risk stratification for colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients: A decision-curve analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1